Efficacy of Glaucoma Drop Aids in Medication Compliance in the Patient Population at Boston Medical Center

January 24, 2019 updated by: Manishi Desai, Boston Medical Center
The purpose of this study is to determine whether glaucoma drop aids will be cost-effective in delivery of ophthalmic medications by improving medication compliance, visual function, and even decreasing medication waste in the patient population at Boston Medical Center (BMC).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients being treated for their glaucoma at BMC's Yawkey Eye Clinic will be selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The three drop aids used in this study will be the Fabrication Autodrop Eye Drop Guide, Owen Mumford OP 6100 Autosqueeze, and the Simply Touch Eye Drop Applicator. Patients will be randomly placed on one of these drops aids for a total of 3 study groups or the no drop aid control, for a total of 4 groups. Prior to use of the drop aid, patients will be instructed on how to use the drop aid by a resident physician and a pre- intervention intraocular pressure check will be performed by the resident physician using an applicator. Intraocular pressure is the only adjustable risk factor for glaucoma; thus, glaucoma treatments slow progression of glaucoma by reducing intraocular pressure. In addition, patients will be requested to deliver their drops with the drop aid with every use. Furthermore, each patient will record the number of days taken to complete the glaucoma medication bottle while using the drop aid. At the 3 and 6 week marks, the patient will fill out a satisfaction survey. Patients will need to return to the clinic at the 6 week mark and can fill out the satisfaction survey at the clinic in addition to checking the intraocular pressure post-intervention. Thus, the number of subject contact will be two, pre and post-intervention, the duration of participation for each subject will be 6 weeks, and the patient will also be required to fill out two satisfaction surveys. The effectiveness of the drop aids will be compared to the two controls and measured with any changes in intraocular pressure readings, length of time to medication completion, and patient satisfaction according to the surveys.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
39

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Boston Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18 years or greater
  • Currently on the same topical medication for treatment of glaucoma for a minimum of two months
  • Patient of Boston University eye Associates
  • Agrees to use the drop aid with each delivery, return to the clinic after 6 weeks of using the drop aid, document completion of medication drops and fill out survey at the end of the 6 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than age 18 years
  • Changes glaucoma medication within the past two month or recent glaucoma surgery
  • Older than 89 years of age
  • Not a patient of the Boston University eye associate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
No glaucoma drop aid control
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Eye Drop Aids
Participants could be placed into one of the drop aid groups (Fabrication Autodrop Eye Drop Guide,Owen Mumford OP 6100 Autosqueeze, or the Simply Touch Eye Drop Applicator)
Device: Eye Drop Aid
Fabrication Autodrop Eye Drop Guide,Owen Mumford OP 6100 Autosqueeze, and the Simply Touch Eye Drop Applicator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Assessed for Intraocular Pressure Change
Time Frame: baseline and 6 weeks
Intraocular pressure (IOP) is measured by Goldman applanation in patients and is expressed in mmHg. The IOP, which is a routine check in the ophthalmic exam, was measured in the eye drop aid group prior to starting drop aid use and at six weeks while using drop aids. IOP was measured at baseline and at 6 weeks in the control group. A significant increase in IOP is defined as an increase of 4 mmHg or more, a significant decreases in IOP is defined as a decrease of 4mmHg or more. No significant change in the IOP is a change between 1-3 mmHg.
baseline and 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Stratified by the Number of Times Eye Was Missed When Inserting Eye Drops
Time Frame: 6 weeks
A question on the six week survey asked approximately how often the participant missed their eye when inserting eye drops. Response options included: missed inserting eye drops 0 times, missed inserting eye drops 1 time, missed inserting eye drops 2 times, or missed inserting eye drops 3 or more times.
6 weeks
Satisfaction With Eye Drop Aid
Time Frame: 6 weeks
A question on the six week survey asked if the participant liked the eye drop aid. Response options included: liked the drop aid long term, did not like the drop aid, or did not use a drop aid. Results were stratified by the three drop aid types (Fabrication Autodrop Eye Drop Guide, Owen Mumford OP 6100 Autosqueeze, or the Simply Touch Eye Drop Applicator).
6 weeks
Intent to Use Eye Drop Aid Long Term
Time Frame: 6 weeks
A question on the six week survey asked if the participant intended to use the eye drop aid long term. Response options included: would use the drop aid long term, would not use the drop aid long term, or did not use a drop aid. Results were stratified by the three drop aid types (Fabrication Autodrop Eye Drop Guide, Owen Mumford OP 6100 Autosqueeze, or the Simply Touch Eye Drop Applicator).
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boston Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Manishi Desai, MD, Boston Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Haben Kefella, MD, Boston Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Avni Badami, MD, Boston Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 23, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 30, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 13, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 16, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 24, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H-34905

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings