Walking Training in Peripheral Artery Disease (GrEnADa Sub-study) (GrEnADa)

June 20, 2019 updated by: Véronique Cornelissen, KU Leuven

12 Weeks of Walking Exercise Training in Women With Peripheral Artery Disease: A Sub-study of GrEnADa-project

Whereas the efficacy of exercise interventions has been abundantly proven in male with peripheral artery disease (PAD), it remains to be determined whether these interventions are effective in women. The aim of this randomized controlled trial which will be performed with 34 PAD women will be to investigating the effects of 12 weeks of supervised walking on functional capacity and cardiovascular function and regulation at rest and during exercise.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aankle-brachial index (ABI) ≤ 0.9 in one or two legs
  • fontaine stage II of PAD
  • body mass index <35 kg/m2
  • resting systolic blood pressure (BP) <160 mmHg and diastolic BP <105 mmHg
  • ability to walk at least 2min at 3.2 km/h
  • ability to undertake an incremental treadmill test
  • decrease of at least 15% in ABI after a maximal treadmill test
  • not currently engaging in any regular exercise program

Exclusion Criteria:

  • exercise induced signs of myocardial ischemia or complex ventricular arrhythmias
  • cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy
  • use of beta-blocker, nondihydropyridine calcium antagonists or insulin and hormone replacement therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Sham Comparator: Stretching exercise group
Patients will receive two session per week of stretching classes.
Other: Stretching exercise group
In each stretching class, approximately 20 exercises will be performed. The total duration of the session will be approximately 30 minutes.
Experimental: Walking training group
Patients will perform two walking sessions per week.
Other: Walking training group
Patients will perform two walking session per week, each consisting of 15*2-min walking bouts, with 2-min of rest in between. The intensity will be set at heart rate corresponding to the pain threshold.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in walking capacity at 12 weeks of follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Claudication onset distance (m) defined as the distance walked until the patients first reported pain in the leg during the treadmill test and total walk distance (m) defined as the total distance that the patient was able to walk during the test will be performed before and after 12 weeks of follow-up.
12 weeks
Change in functional capacity at 12 weeks of follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Walking economy defined as VO2 measured during the first stage of the treadmill test and functional capacity defined as VO2 peak obtained during the test will be measured to determine the cardiopulmonary response after 12 weeks of walking training.
12 weeks
Change in heart rate pain threshold at 12 weeks of follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The heart rate obtained at claudication onset distance during the treadmill test will be evaluate before and after 12 weeks of follow-up.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index decrease at 12 weeks of follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Will defined by the difference in ankle-brachial index measured immediately after the exercise and pre-exercise.
12 weeks
Change in ischemic window at 12 weeks of follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Calculated by area under the curve of the ankle systolic blood pressure measured during the first 10 min of recovery after the test divided by total walk distance.
12 weeks
Change in autonomic modulation at 12 weeks of follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Autonomic modulation: assessed by spectral analysis of heart rate and systolic blood pressure variabilities. Heart rate (electrocardiogram) and beat-by-beat blood pressure (finometer) will be recorded for 10 min at a sample frequency of 500Hz/channel.
12 weeks
Change in cardiac output at 12 weeks of follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Cardiac output will be estimated at baseline and after 12 weeks of follow-up bu the indirect Fick method using the CO2 rebreathing technique and a metabolic card.
12 weeks
Change in vascular function at 12 weeks of follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Blood flow and blood flow in response to hyperemia will be obtained.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
KU Leuven

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 24, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 25, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 20, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 150716_GrenSub

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intermittent Claudication

Clinical Trials on Stretching exercise group

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings