Fish Oil vs. Placebo on Subjective Effects of Alcohol
Effect of Fish Oil vs. Placebo on Subjective Effects of Alcohol in Healthy Humans
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
There have been no studies to date that have examined the relationship between fish oil and alcohol response in humans. The current study was designed to examine the relationship between fish oil and subjective alcohol effects in healthy social drinkers.
This project represents a first step in examining the potential use of fish oil for the treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD). The investigators will evaluate responses to alcohol through administration of a steady state blood alcohol level (BAL) with an IV infusion using a method that employs an infusion that is titrated to a breathalyzer reading and clamped at a steady state. This approach allows direct comparisons of the acute effects of a specific dose of ethanol between groups, without the confounding factors of variable alcohol absorption and peak BAL's. This approach will allow the examiners to carefully examine if fish oil changes the acute effects of alcohol on a number of outcome domains including subjective drug effects, cognitive performance, and cerebellar effects.
As this study is a pilot study, it is not clear whether fish oil will attenuate alcohol induced subjective stimulation or sedation. Since this is the first study to evaluate fish oil's effects on alcohol-effects in the laboratory, the investigators will be testing for attenuation of alcohol-induced sedative and stimulant effects, as well as cognitive effects and cerebellar effects.
In this study, fish oil will be administered at 3 grams/day for 30-40 days (3 capsules twice a day). The investigators will use 3 grams/day for two reasons: 1) it is within the range of doses safely used in humans (1g to 6g) as a treatment for various psychiatric conditions (depression, anxiety, borderline personality disorder), and 2) is a dose that has shown efficacy in various clinical trials for psychiatric conditions.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Connecticut
-
West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516
- VA Connecticut Healtcare System
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male and females, between the ages of 21 and 55;
- No current drug use disorder of any drugs of abuse (except tobacco or marijuana);
- No current medical problems and normal ECG;
- For women, not pregnant as determined by pregnancy screening nor breast feeding, and using acceptable birth control methods.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current major psychiatric illnesses including mood, psychotic, or anxiety disorders;
- History of major medical illnesses; including liver diseases, heart disease, chronic pain or other medical conditions that the physician investigator deems contraindicated for the subject to be in the study;
- Liver function tests (ALT or AST) greater than 3 times normal;
- Allergy to seafood.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Fish Oil with ethanol and placebo ethanol infusions
Between days 30-40 subjects will participate in 2 test days at least 2 days apart and during the test day will receive an IV infusion of ethanol (placebo vs. targeted Breath Alcohol Concentration ((BrAC) of 100mg%) in a clamped fashion.
Test days will be in a randomized order.
|
Fish Oil with ethanol and placebo ethanol infusions
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo with ethanol and placebo ethanol infusions
Between days 30-40 subjects will participate in 2 test days at least 2 days apart and during the test day will receive an IV infusion of ethanol (placebo vs. targeted Breath Alcohol Concentration ((BrAC) of 100mg%) in a clamped fashion.
Test days will be in a randomized order.
|
Placebo with ethanol and placebo ethanol infusions
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of stimulant and sedative effects of alcohol with the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES).
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The BAES is a 14-item self-report scale.
Seven items measure stimulant effects of alcohol during the test sessions and seven items measure sedative effects.
Stimulant and sedative effect scores range from 0 (not at all) to 70 (extremely).
|
Baseline
|
|
Assessment of stimulant and sedative effects of alcohol with the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES).
Time Frame: Week 4 (test session 1)
|
Week 4 (test session 1)
|
|
|
Assessment of stimulant and sedative effects of alcohol with the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES).
Time Frame: Week 6 (test session 2)
|
Week 6 (test session 2)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cognitive performance measured with the Rapid Information Processing Task (RVIP)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
(RVIP) is a widely used task to assess sustained attention, with a working memory component.
In this task, a series of single digits is presented on a computer screen at a rate of 100 digits per minute for 4 min.
Targets are defined as three consecutive odd digits (e.g., 7-9-3) or three consecutive even digits (e.g., 2-8-6).
The percentage of targets correctly detected will be the main outcome measure.
|
Baseline
|
|
Cognitive performance measured with the Rapid Information Processing Task (RVIP)
Time Frame: Week 4 (test session 1)
|
(RVIP) is a widely used task to assess sustained attention, with a working memory component.
In this task, a series of single digits is presented on a computer screen at a rate of 100 digits per minute for 4 min.
Targets are defined as three consecutive odd digits (e.g., 7-9-3) or three consecutive even digits (e.g., 2-8-6).
The percentage of targets correctly detected will be the main outcome measure.
|
Week 4 (test session 1)
|
|
Cognitive performance measured with the Rapid Information Processing Task (RVIP)
Time Frame: Week 6 (test session 2)
|
(RVIP) is a widely used task to assess sustained attention, with a working memory component.
In this task, a series of single digits is presented on a computer screen at a rate of 100 digits per minute for 4 min.
Targets are defined as three consecutive odd digits (e.g., 7-9-3) or three consecutive even digits (e.g., 2-8-6).
The percentage of targets correctly detected will be the main outcome measure.
|
Week 6 (test session 2)
|
|
Cognitive performance measured by a "Go No-Go task" will assess the ability to withhold responses to an infrequently occurring target.
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A series of blue and green rectangular shapes are presented every 1150 ms and participants are instructed to press a spacebar every time the green rectangular shape appeared, and to give equal importance to speed and accuracy.
The primary outcome is the number of errors on the No-Go trials.
|
Baseline
|
|
Cognitive performance measured by a "Go No-Go task" will assess the ability to withhold responses to an infrequently occurring target.
Time Frame: Week 4 (test session 1)
|
A series of blue and green rectangular shapes are presented every 1150 ms and participants are instructed to press a spacebar every time the green rectangular shape appeared, and to give equal importance to speed and accuracy.
The primary outcome is the number of errors on the No-Go trials.
|
Week 4 (test session 1)
|
|
Cognitive performance measured by a "Go No-Go task" will assess the ability to withhold responses to an infrequently occurring target.
Time Frame: Week 6 (test session 2)
|
A series of blue and green rectangular shapes are presented every 1150 ms and participants are instructed to press a spacebar every time the green rectangular shape appeared, and to give equal importance to speed and accuracy.
The primary outcome is the number of errors on the No-Go trials.
|
Week 6 (test session 2)
|
|
Cognitive performance measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R).
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The HVLT-R is a word list learning test of verbal memory.
The outcome is the percent correct on immediate and delayed recall of words on a list.
|
Baseline
|
|
Cognitive performance measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R).
Time Frame: Week 4 (test session 1)
|
The HVLT-R is a word list learning test of verbal memory.
The outcome is the percent correct on immediate and delayed recall of words on a list.
|
Week 4 (test session 1)
|
|
Cognitive performance measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R).
Time Frame: Week 6 (test session 2)
|
The HVLT-R is a word list learning test of verbal memory.
The outcome is the percent correct on immediate and delayed recall of words on a list.
|
Week 6 (test session 2)
|
|
Motor Impairment: The Grooved Pegboard Test (Lafayette Instrument Company) is a manipulative dexterity test,
Time Frame: Baseline
|
This is an eye-to hand timed coordination test.
A quicker time indicates greater coordination.
|
Baseline
|
|
Motor Impairment: The Grooved Pegboard Test (Lafayette Instrument Company) is a manipulative dexterity test,
Time Frame: Week 4 (test session 1)
|
This is an eye-to hand timed coordination test.
A quicker time indicates greater coordination.
|
Week 4 (test session 1)
|
|
Motor Impairment: The Grooved Pegboard Test (Lafayette Instrument Company) is a manipulative dexterity test,
Time Frame: Week 6 (test session 2)
|
This is an eye-to hand timed coordination test.
A quicker time indicates greater coordination.
|
Week 6 (test session 2)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ismene Petrakis, M.D., Yale University/VA Connecticut Healthcare System
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Subramanian MG, Heil SH, Kruger ML, Collins KL, Buck PO, Zawacki T, Abbey A, Sokol RJ, Diamond MP. A three-stage alcohol clamp procedure in human subjects. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002 Oct;26(10):1479-83. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000034038.41972.36.
- Zimmermann US, O'Connor S, Ramchandani VA. Modeling alcohol self-administration in the human laboratory. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2013;13:315-53. doi: 10.1007/7854_2011_149.
- Ramchandani VA, O'Connor S, Blekher T, Kareken D, Morzorati S, Nurnberger J Jr, Li TK. A preliminary study of acute responses to clamped alcohol concentration and family history of alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1999 Aug;23(8):1320-30.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1609018478
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Alcohol Dependence
-
NCT07216872RecruitingAlcohol Dependence | Alcoholism | Alcohol Use Disorder | Alcohol Abuse | Alcohol Addiction | Alcohol Abuse/Dependence
-
NCT01633905Completed
-
NCT01560013Unknown
-
NCT00246415CompletedAlcohol Abuse | Alcohol Dependence (Primary Condition)
-
NCT04331288CompletedPotential Treatment for Alcohol Dependence-Alcohol Interaction
-
NCT03892369CompletedAlcohol Abuse or Dependence
-
NCT01449981CompletedAlcohol Dependence | Drug Abuse | Alcohol Abuse | Drug Dependence
-
NCT01128140CompletedAlcohol Dependence | Substance Abuse | Alcohol Abuse | Substance Dependence
-
NCT03232112CompletedAddiction, Alcohol | Alcohol Dependence, in Remission
-
NCT05042180RecruitingAddiction, Alcohol | Alcohol Dependence, in Remission
Clinical Trials on Fish Oil with ethanol and placebo ethanol infusions
-
NCT04522973CompletedElectronic Cigarette Use
-
NCT03826303CompletedElectronic Cigarette Use
-
NCT04554433UnknownCovid-19 | Drug Effect
-
NCT02473705WithdrawnCardiovascular Disease | Chronic Kidney Disease
-
NCT04090801Completed
-
NCT06414226Completed
-
NCT00612352Completed
-
NCT07100847RecruitingPROSTATE CANCER | NERVES | NEUROBIOLOGY OF CANCER | NEUROLYSIS