Efficacy of Intrathecal Oxytocin to Speed Recovery After Hip Surgery

November 1, 2022 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of intrathecal oxytocin on speed of reduction in pain for the first 60 days after hip surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a single-center, NIH funded clinical study at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center. The investigators anticipate that intrathecal oxytocin will speed recovery from pain after major surgery (hip arthroplasty). For this study, the investigators will use a randomized, controlled and blinded study of intrathecal oxytocin in patients scheduled for hip arthroplasty, with primary outcome being the slope of change in pain over the first 60 days following surgery, using growth curve modeling and a ln(time) function.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
126

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled for unilateral, primary total hip replacement
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Currently Workman's Comp litigation related to hip replacement
  • Taking greater than 100 milligrams of morphine (or equivalent)
  • Suffering from a psychotic disorder or a recent psychiatric hospitalization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Oxytocin
Oxytocin 100 micrograms administered intrathecally
Drug: Oxytocin
spinal injection of oxytocin
Other Names:
  • Pitocin
Placebo Comparator: Placebos
Placebo injection administered intrathecally
Drug: Placebo
spinal injection of placebo
Other Names:
  • Saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Adjusted Trajectory Model for Pain Between Oxytocin and Placebo--Intercept
Time Frame: The first day after hospital discharge

Daily pain intensity report for each subject was fitted using growth curve model with parameters of intercept (modeled initial pain) and slope of change in natural log of time, adjusted for prognostic predictors for oxytocin and placebo group separately. The daily pain intensity was the WORST pain (not the average pain) in the past 24 hr on a scale where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst imaginable pain.

Values represent an intercept of modeled worst daily pain on the first day after hospital discharge across all participants, extracted from the mixed effect model. The intercept is a number representative of all participants in the Arm and is an estimate with confidence limits based on the model.
The first day after hospital discharge
Comparison of Adjusted Trajectory Model for Pain Between Oxytocin and Placebo--Slope
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1 through Postoperative Day 60

Daily pain intensity report for each subject was fitted using growth curve model with parameters of intercept (modeled initial pain) and slope of change in natural log of time, adjusted for prognostic predictors for oxytocin and placebo group separately. The daily pain intensity was the WORST pain in the past 24 hr on a scale where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst imaginable pain.

Slope is defined as change in pain . Values represent the slope of modeled worst daily pain (0-10 scale as described above) divided by the natural log of time (days) across all participants, extracted from the mixed effect model. The slope is a number representative of all participants in the Arm and is an estimate with confidence limits based on the model.
Postoperative Day 1 through Postoperative Day 60

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Adjusted Trajectory Model for Daily Steps Between Oxytocin and Placebo--Intercept
Time Frame: The first day after hospital discharge

Daily steps for each subject were fitted using growth curve model with parameters of intercept (modeled initial steps) and slope of change in natural log of time, adjusted for prognostic predictors for oxytocin and placebo group separately. This is considered as the modeled change in activity listed in the protocol.

Values represent an intercept of modeled daily steps on the first day after hospital discharge across all participants, extracted from the mixed effect model. The intercept is a number representative of all participants in the Arm and is an estimate with confidence limits based on the model.
The first day after hospital discharge
Comparison of Adjusted Trajectory Model for Daily Steps Between Oxytocin and Placebo--Slope
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1 through Postoperative Day 60
Daily steps for each subject were fitted using growth curve model with parameters of intercept (modeled initial steps) and slope of change in natural log of time, adjusted for prognostic predictors for oxytocin and placebo group separately. This is considered as the modeled change in activity listed in the protocol. Values represent the slope of daily steps divided by the natural log of time (days) across all participants, extracted from the mixed effect model. The slope is a number representative of all participants in the Arm and is an estimate with confidence limits based on the model.
Postoperative Day 1 through Postoperative Day 60
Comparison of Adjusted Trajectory Model for World Health Organization Disability Assessment Score 2.0 Value Between Oxytocin and Placebo--Intercept
Time Frame: Modeled WHODAS 2.0 one week after hospital discharge

Weekly World Health Organization Disability Assessment Score 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) value for each subject was fitted using growth curve model with parameters of intercept (modeled initial score) and slope of change in natural log of time, adjusted for prognostic predictors for oxytocin and placebo group separately. Scale is 12 to 36 with higher scores meaning greater disability.

Values represent an intercept of modeled WHODAS 2.0 score one week after hospital discharge across all participants, extracted from the mixed effect model. The intercept is a number representative of all participants in the Arm and is an estimate with confidence limits based on the model.
Modeled WHODAS 2.0 one week after hospital discharge
Comparison of Adjusted Trajectory Model for World Health Organization Disability Assessment Score 2.0 Value Between Oxytocin and Placebo--Slope
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 7 through Postoperative Day 56

Weekly World Health Organization Disability Assessment Score 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) value for each subject was fitted using growth curve model with parameters of intercept (modeled initial score) and slope of change in natural log of time, adjusted for prognostic predictors for oxytocin and placebo group separately. Scale is 12 to 36 with higher scores meaning greater disability.

Values represent the slope of WHODAS 2.0 score divided by the natural log of time (days) across all participants, extracted from the mixed effect model. The slope is a number representative of all participants in the Arm and is an estimate with confidence limits based on the model.
Postoperative Day 7 through Postoperative Day 56
Comparison of Adjusted Trajectory Model for Probability of Taking Opioids Daily Between Oxytocin and Placebo--Intercept
Time Frame: The first day after hospital discharge

Daily probability of taking opioids for each subject was fitted using growth curve model with parameters of intercept (modeled initial pain) and slope of change in natural log of time, adjusted for prognostic predictors for oxytocin and placebo group separately.

Values represent an intercept of modeled probability of taking opioid, on a 0-1 probability scale, on the first day after hospital discharge across all participants, extracted from the mixed effect model. The intercept is a number representative of all participants in the Arm and is an estimate with standard deviation based on the model.
The first day after hospital discharge
Comparison of Adjusted Trajectory Model for Probability of Taking Opioids Daily Between Oxytocin and Placebo--Slope
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1 through Postoperative Day 60

Daily probability of taking opioids for each subject was fitted using growth curve model with parameters of intercept (modeled initial pain) and slope of change in natural log of time, adjusted for prognostic predictors for oxytocin and placebo group separately.

Values represent the slope of daily probability of taking opioids divided by the natural log of time (days) across all participants, extracted from the mixed effect model. The slope is a number representative of all participants in the Arm and is an estimate with confidence limits based on the model
Postoperative Day 1 through Postoperative Day 60
Iowa Gambling Task
Time Frame: Preoperative, 2 months after surgery
This is a computer based card game which assesses risk taking and impulsivity in which a score of -100 to 100 is calculated. Lower numbers indicate greater impulsiivity
Preoperative, 2 months after surgery
Wisconsin Card Sort Task
Time Frame: Preoperative, 2 months after surgery
This is a physical card sorting game which measures attention to shifts in implicit rules as the game progresses. Perseverative errors are the number of sequential errors when rules of the game shift and reflect dysfunction of attention. This score ranges from 0 to 64 with larger numbers reflecting more dysfunction of attention.
Preoperative, 2 months after surgery
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Preoperative, 2 months after surgery
This 17-question scale assesses the degree of fear of pain from joint movement and is commonly used in orthopedic injury or surgery studies. The scale ranges from 17 to 68 with 17 indicating no fear of movement and 68 indicating severe fear.
Preoperative, 2 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 12, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 23, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 11, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 3, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 1, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00036246

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Oxytocin

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings