Nerve Sparing Radical Hysterectomy VS Radical Hysterectomy: Safety and Clinical Efficacy

March 1, 2017 updated by: Chen Chunlin

The Randomized Controlled Trial of Nerve Sparing Hysterectomy Radical Hysterectomy and Radical Hysterectomy

Cervical cancer in young patients increased significantly in recent years, and early surgical treatment for patients with 5 years of survival rate is as high as 90%, But the traditional extensive hysterectomy (RH) caused by intraoperative pelvic autonomic nerve may damage the bladder and rectum and the incidence of complications such as sexual dysfunction is nearly 25% to 80%, thus seriously affect the patient's quality of life.Pelvic autonomic nerve preservation system of extensive hysterectomy (NSRH) can decrease the complications of above, but at home and abroad mainly adopts pulling the urine tube time, determination methods of residual urine volume, bladder function are studied in only a few scholars urine flow mechanics method is applied to carry on objective appraisal limited cases of postoperative bladder function, and the anorectal function damage ，we can use the anorectal dynamics to get objective index of anorectal function .overall research lack of large sample research of dynamic system. No objective index to evaluate the anorectal function In the early stage of the study, we have conducted about uterine ligament, sacral ligaments and nerve distribution of the bladder cervix vaginal ligament of experimental research, provide the neural anatomy basis for NSRH operation, and based on research for innovative operation scheme is put forward.Proposed on the basis of the above research, this study adopt the internationally used - urine flow mechanics, the method for evaluating the bladder function of NSRH, RH, two kinds of the injured function of bladder surgery patients before and after operation of comparative study, the change of dynamic assessment before and after surgery in patients with bladder function,and the anorectal function dameage and than provide the basis for further treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
        • Southern Medical Universtity, China

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cervical Cancer FIGO(2009) IA2,IB1,IB2,IIA1,IIA2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cervical Cancer FIGO(2009) > IIb
  • Patients received radiotherapy before opration
  • The patient refused to sign a consent form.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
The patient recived surgury of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.
Procedure: nerve sparing radical hysterectomy
Type C1 radical hysterectomy,that is nerve sparing radical hysterectomy, requires separation of two parts of the dorsal parametria: the medialpart , which entails recto -uterineandrecto-vaginal ligaments, and the lateral laminar structure, also called mesoureter, which contains the hypogastric plexus. Furthermore, type C1 requires only a partial dissection of the ureter from the ventral parametria, which is usually asymmetric towards more extensive resection of the medial leaf of the cranial (above the ureter) part of the ventral parametria .
Other Names:
  • Type C1 radical hysterectomy
Active Comparator: radical hysterectomy
The patient recived surgury of radical hysterectomy.
Procedure: radical hysterectomy
In the C2 type, the ureter is completely dissected from the ventral parametria up to the urinary bladder wall. Defining the resection limits on the longitudinal (deep parametrial or vertical) plane is crucial for distinguishing between types C1 and C2.
Other Names:
  • Type C2 radical hysterectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival rates
Time Frame: 5 years after operation
Live or die
5 years after operation
The recurrence rate
Time Frame: 5 years after operation
Whether the tumor recurrence
5 years after operation
Abdominal pressure urination
Time Frame: 1 years after operation
Urine flow dynamic test results
1 years after operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Abdominal pressure urination
Time Frame: 3 months after operation
Urine flow dynamic test results
3 months after operation
Abdominal pressure urination
Time Frame: 6 months after operation
Urine flow dynamic test results
6 months after operation
the results of anorectal dynamics
Time Frame: 1 months after opration
the results of anorectal dynamics
1 months after opration
the results of anorectal dynamics
Time Frame: 3 months after opration
the results of anorectal dynamics
3 months after opration
the results of anorectal dynamics
Time Frame: 6 months after opration
the results of anorectal dynamics
6 months after opration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chen Chunlin

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 1, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 3, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 3, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 1, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SNSRH001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Cancer

Clinical Trials on nerve sparing radical hysterectomy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings