Interscalene vs. Superficial Cervical Block vs. Combination for Analgesia After Clavicle Fracture

May 2, 2018 updated by: Dr. Paul McHardy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Comparison of Interscalene vs. Superficial Cervical Block vs. Combination of Both Blocks for Analgesia After Operative Repair of Midshaft and Lateral Clavicle Fractures

The optimal analgesic peripheral nerve block (or combinations thereof) are undefined for clavicle fractures, the most frequent fracture in the human population. This goal of this study is to determine whether interscalene block (ISB), superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB), or both provide the best analgesia for lateral and midshaft clavicular fractures, respectively.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Clavicle fractures are relatively common injuries that occur most often in young active males and elderly individuals. They are often a result of direct trauma to the shoulder, typically from a fall. Clavicle fractures represent 5-10% of all fractures and represent the most frequent fracture in the human population. Midshaft fractures account for 69-85% of the clavicle fractures, distal shaft fractures 12-28%. (1) Analgesia for clavicle fractures can be challenging for anaesthetists secondary to the complex and varied innervation in this region. Literature describing the innervation of the clavicle and overlying skin is heterogeneous with the C3 to C6 nerve roots being involved. The clavicle itself has been reported to be innervated either by C4 or by C5 and C6 (subclavian nerve) nerve roots. (2) Regional anaesthesia for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia of clavicle fractures employs several possible, commonly used approaches. The contemporary literature surrounding the optimal regional anaesthetic technique for clavicle surgery which can provide superior postoperative analgesia and minimize systemic agents intraoperatively is lacking Currently there are only small case series or case reports published. Peripheral nerve blocks used to anesthetize the clavicle include SCPB, ISB, and combined SCPB-ISB. Larger, systematic trials have not yet been performed to our knowledge and as recently as one year ago a call for more evidence in this area of regional anaesthesia was published in the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. The purpose of this study is to compare analgesic outcomes after the common regional anesthetic techniques (ISB versus SCPB versus both).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Recruiting
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Paul McHardy, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Stephen Choi, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Patrick Henry, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 81 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of clavicle fracture (midshaft or lateral)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lack of patient consent
  • contra-indication to upper extremity peripheral nerve block (eg. severe pulmonary dysfunction)
  • inability to lie supine for nerve block
  • polytrauma
  • pre-existing neurologic deficit in operative upper extremity
  • allergy to amide local anesthetic
  • contralateral phrenic nerve dysfunction
  • chronic opioid use (>30mg daily oral morphine equivalent)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: US guided SCPB medial fracture
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine. 10ml injected for ultrasound guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block at C4 or C5.
Procedure: SCPB
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% epinephrine. 10ml injected for US guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block at C4 or C5.
Other Names:
  • Superficial Cervical Plexus
Drug: Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride , epinephrine
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine
Active Comparator: US guided ISB medial fracture
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5%(1:200,000) epinephrine. 10ml injected for ultrasound guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block at C5 or C6.
Drug: Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride , epinephrine
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine
Procedure: ISB
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% epinephrine. 10ml injected for US guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block at C5 or C6.
Other Names:
  • Interscalene Brachial Plexus
Active Comparator: US guided SCPB + ISB medial fracture
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine. 10ml injected for ultrasound guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block at C4 or C5. 10ml injected for ultrasound guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block at C5 or C6.
Drug: Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride , epinephrine
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine
Procedure: SCPB + ISB
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% epinephrine. 10ml injected for US guided SCPB at C4 or C5 + 10ml injected for ISB at C5 or C6.
Other Names:
  • Superficial Cervical Plexus & Interscalene Brachial Plexus
Active Comparator: US guided SCPB lateral fracture
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine. 10ml injected for ultrasound guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block at C4 or C5.
Procedure: SCPB
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% epinephrine. 10ml injected for US guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block at C4 or C5.
Other Names:
  • Superficial Cervical Plexus
Drug: Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride , epinephrine
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine
Active Comparator: US guided ISB lateral fracture
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5%(1:200,000) epinephrine. 10ml injected for ultrasound guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block at C5 or C6.
Drug: Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride , epinephrine
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine
Procedure: ISB
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% epinephrine. 10ml injected for US guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block at C5 or C6.
Other Names:
  • Interscalene Brachial Plexus
Active Comparator: US guided SCPB + ISB lateral fracture
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine. 10ml injected for ultrasound guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block at C4 or C5. 10ml injected for ultrasound guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block at C5 or C6.
Drug: Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride , epinephrine
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine
Procedure: SCPB + ISB
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% epinephrine. 10ml injected for US guided SCPB at C4 or C5 + 10ml injected for ISB at C5 or C6.
Other Names:
  • Superficial Cervical Plexus & Interscalene Brachial Plexus

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain measurement using NRS in PACU
Time Frame: 1 hour post-op
Numeric Rating Scale for Pain upon discharge from Post-anesthetic Care Unit
1 hour post-op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain measurement using NRS at Discharge
Time Frame: 4 hours post-op
Numeric Rating Scale for Pain upon discharge from hospital
4 hours post-op
Opioid consumption in morphine equivalence
Time Frame: 4 hours post-op
Total postoperative opioid consumption from end of operation to hospital discharge
4 hours post-op
Satisfaction using rating scale
Time Frame: 4 hours post-op
Patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia at time of discharge
4 hours post-op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Paul McHardy, MD, FRCPC, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 21, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 2, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 036-2016

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings