Interscalene vs. Superficial Cervical Block vs. Combination for Analgesia After Clavicle Fracture

May 2, 2018 updated by: Dr. Paul McHardy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Comparison of Interscalene vs. Superficial Cervical Block vs. Combination of Both Blocks for Analgesia After Operative Repair of Midshaft and Lateral Clavicle Fractures

The optimal analgesic peripheral nerve block (or combinations thereof) are undefined for clavicle fractures, the most frequent fracture in the human population. This goal of this study is to determine whether interscalene block (ISB), superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB), or both provide the best analgesia for lateral and midshaft clavicular fractures, respectively.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Clavicle fractures are relatively common injuries that occur most often in young active males and elderly individuals. They are often a result of direct trauma to the shoulder, typically from a fall. Clavicle fractures represent 5-10% of all fractures and represent the most frequent fracture in the human population. Midshaft fractures account for 69-85% of the clavicle fractures, distal shaft fractures 12-28%. (1) Analgesia for clavicle fractures can be challenging for anaesthetists secondary to the complex and varied innervation in this region. Literature describing the innervation of the clavicle and overlying skin is heterogeneous with the C3 to C6 nerve roots being involved. The clavicle itself has been reported to be innervated either by C4 or by C5 and C6 (subclavian nerve) nerve roots. (2) Regional anaesthesia for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia of clavicle fractures employs several possible, commonly used approaches. The contemporary literature surrounding the optimal regional anaesthetic technique for clavicle surgery which can provide superior postoperative analgesia and minimize systemic agents intraoperatively is lacking Currently there are only small case series or case reports published. Peripheral nerve blocks used to anesthetize the clavicle include SCPB, ISB, and combined SCPB-ISB. Larger, systematic trials have not yet been performed to our knowledge and as recently as one year ago a call for more evidence in this area of regional anaesthesia was published in the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. The purpose of this study is to compare analgesic outcomes after the common regional anesthetic techniques (ISB versus SCPB versus both).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Recruiting
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Paul McHardy, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Stephen Choi, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Patrick Henry, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 81 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of clavicle fracture (midshaft or lateral)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lack of patient consent
  • contra-indication to upper extremity peripheral nerve block (eg. severe pulmonary dysfunction)
  • inability to lie supine for nerve block
  • polytrauma
  • pre-existing neurologic deficit in operative upper extremity
  • allergy to amide local anesthetic
  • contralateral phrenic nerve dysfunction
  • chronic opioid use (>30mg daily oral morphine equivalent)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: US guided SCPB medial fracture
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine. 10ml injected for ultrasound guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block at C4 or C5.
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% epinephrine. 10ml injected for US guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block at C4 or C5.
Other Names:
  • Superficial Cervical Plexus
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine
Active Comparator: US guided ISB medial fracture
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5%(1:200,000) epinephrine. 10ml injected for ultrasound guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block at C5 or C6.
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% epinephrine. 10ml injected for US guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block at C5 or C6.
Other Names:
  • Interscalene Brachial Plexus
Active Comparator: US guided SCPB + ISB medial fracture
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine. 10ml injected for ultrasound guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block at C4 or C5. 10ml injected for ultrasound guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block at C5 or C6.
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% epinephrine. 10ml injected for US guided SCPB at C4 or C5 + 10ml injected for ISB at C5 or C6.
Other Names:
  • Superficial Cervical Plexus & Interscalene Brachial Plexus
Active Comparator: US guided SCPB lateral fracture
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine. 10ml injected for ultrasound guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block at C4 or C5.
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% epinephrine. 10ml injected for US guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block at C4 or C5.
Other Names:
  • Superficial Cervical Plexus
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine
Active Comparator: US guided ISB lateral fracture
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5%(1:200,000) epinephrine. 10ml injected for ultrasound guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block at C5 or C6.
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% epinephrine. 10ml injected for US guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block at C5 or C6.
Other Names:
  • Interscalene Brachial Plexus
Active Comparator: US guided SCPB + ISB lateral fracture
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine. 10ml injected for ultrasound guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block at C4 or C5. 10ml injected for ultrasound guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block at C5 or C6.
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% (1:200,000) epinephrine
Bupivacaine hydrogen chloride Inj 0.5% epinephrine. 10ml injected for US guided SCPB at C4 or C5 + 10ml injected for ISB at C5 or C6.
Other Names:
  • Superficial Cervical Plexus & Interscalene Brachial Plexus

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain measurement using NRS in PACU
Time Frame: 1 hour post-op
Numeric Rating Scale for Pain upon discharge from Post-anesthetic Care Unit
1 hour post-op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain measurement using NRS at Discharge
Time Frame: 4 hours post-op
Numeric Rating Scale for Pain upon discharge from hospital
4 hours post-op
Opioid consumption in morphine equivalence
Time Frame: 4 hours post-op
Total postoperative opioid consumption from end of operation to hospital discharge
4 hours post-op
Satisfaction using rating scale
Time Frame: 4 hours post-op
Patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia at time of discharge
4 hours post-op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul McHardy, MD, FRCPC, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 21, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Clavicle Fracture

Clinical Trials on SCPB

Subscribe