Collection of Serum Samples in Studying Emotional Stress in Patients With Prostate Cancer

March 8, 2022 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Correlation of Serum Catecholamine With Emotional Stress in Men With Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study

This pilot research trial studies the collection of serum samples in studying emotional stress in patients with prostate cancer. Studying serum samples from patients with prostate cancer in the laboratory may help doctors determine if levels of epinephrine and cortisol, substances the body makes when stressed, rise or fall with how patients are feeling and/or if those levels are related to clinical information related to prostate cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine if serum epinephrine or cortisol levels in men with prostate cancer correlate with perceived stress or distress over time in two to five consecutive visits.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the change in serum epinephrine levels in men with prostate cancer over time in two to five consecutive visits.

II. To determine the change in serum cortisol levels in men with prostate cancer over time in two to five consecutive visits.

III. To determine the change in levels of stress in men with prostate cancer over time in two to five consecutive visits IV. To determine the change in levels of distress in men with prostate cancer over time in two to five consecutive visits.

TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine if serum epinephrine or cortisol levels in men with prostate cancer correlate with prostate cancer progression two to five visits.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo collection of serum samples for epinephrine and cortisol levels at baseline and 4 clinical visits. Patients also receive the Self-Perceived Stress questionnaire and the Distress Thermometer questionnaire to measure perceived stress.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
61

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult men with prostate cancer

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A confirmed diagnosis of prostate cancer
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, 2
  • Individuals able to understand and willing to sign an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of current or past medical or psychiatric illness that would make participation difficult or not feasible at the discretion of the principal investigator or co-investigators

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Ancillary-Correlative (collection of samples, questionnaires)
Patients undergo collection of serum samples for epinephrine and cortisol levels at baseline and 4 clinical visits. Patients also receive the Self-Perceived Stress questionnaire and the Distress Thermometer questionnaire to measure perceived stress.
Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Other: Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Procedure: Biospecimen Collection
Undergo collection of serum samples

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in distress score, assessed by the Distress Thermometer
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
Will calculate the patient's stress levels at each of the 5 visits using a validated distress thermometer
Up to 1 year
Change in perceived stress scores, assessed by the Self-Perceived Stress Questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
Will calculate the patient's stress levels at each of the 5 visits using a validated measure of self-perceived stress
Up to 1 year
Change in serum cortisol levels
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
Will calculate the change in serum cortisol levels between the first and last assessment and calculate the corresponding change in perceived stress or distress during the same time period. Will estimate the Pearson correlation between the two changes. Will also estimate a 95% confidence interval for this estimated correlation. These calculations will be performed overall (pooling all 3 groups together) and then repeated for each of the three groups of men separately. Will fit a longitudinal mixed model that incorporates the repeated measures taken on each patient. Additional int
Up to 1 year
Change in serum epinephrine levels
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
Will calculate the change in serum epinephrine levels between the first and last assessment and calculate the corresponding change in perceived stress or distress during the same time period. Will estimate the Pearson correlation between the two changes. Will also estimate a 95% confidence interval for this estimated correlation. These calculations will be performed overall (pooling all 3 groups together) and then repeated for each of the three groups of men separately. Will fit a longitudinal mixed model that incorporates the repeated measures taken on each patient. Additional int
Up to 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in levels of distress assessed by the Distress Thermometer
Time Frame: Baseline up to 1 year
Will fit a two-way random effects model to examine the time course of distress levels.
Baseline up to 1 year
Change in self-perceived stress, assessed by the Self-Perceived Stress Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline up to 1 year
Will fit a two-way random effects model to examine the time course of stress levels.
Baseline up to 1 year
Change in serum cortisol levels
Time Frame: Baseline up to 1 year
Will fit a two-way random effects model to examine the time course of serum cortisol levels.
Baseline up to 1 year
Change in serum epinephrine levels
Time Frame: Baseline up to 1 year
Will fit a two-way random effects model to examine the time course of serum epinephrine levels.
Baseline up to 1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in levels of serum prostate specific antigen in patients with complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 1 year
Will determine whether there are any differences at each of the time points in serum epinephrine or cortisol levels using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) models.
Baseline up to 1 year
Change in serum cortisol AUC values
Time Frame: Baseline up to 1 year
Will be compared across the 4-levels of progression (CR, PR, SD, and PD) or 2-levels of progression (CR/PR vs SD/PD) using ANOVA models. These models can be run separately for each of the 3 groups of patients - and also in an overall model with all patients included and a covariate for group and group by AUC value interaction.
Baseline up to 1 year
Change in serum epinephrine area under the curve (AUC) values
Time Frame: Baseline up to 1 year
Will be compared across the 4-levels of progression (CR, PR, SD, and PD) or 2-levels of progression (CR/PR vs SD/PD) using ANOVA models. These models can be run separately for each of the 3 groups of patients - and also in an overall model with all patients included and a covariate for group and group by AUC value interaction.
Baseline up to 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bart Frizzell, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 24, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 24, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 27, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 17, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 8, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00041151
  • P30CA012197 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NCI-2016-01590 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • CCCWFU 85316 (Other Identifier: Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings