Impact of Cancer Treatment on the Pelvic Floor Function in Survivors of Cervical Cancer

December 18, 2018 updated by: Aline Moreira Ribeiro, University of Sao Paulo
Introduction: Pelvic floor muscle dysfunctions (PFMD) represent an important public health problem that manifests itself through lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), anorectal and sexual dysfunction. PFMD is a common problem in cervical cancer survivors (CC) with a negative impact on quality of life (QoL). Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effect of oncological treatment on the function of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) of survivors of CC. Methods: Patients diagnosed with CC, of any stage, histology and degree, accompanied by the Oncology Gynecology Service of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Medical School of Ribeirão Preto at the University of São Paulo, will be studied in the period between 2004 and 2014. Four study groups will be formed: (1) Patients with CC with PFMD; (2) Patients with CC without PFMD; : (3) Patients without CC with PFMD; (2) Patients without CC without PFMD. Non-cancer patients will be recruited into the community. For the analysis of the prevalence of PFMD will be applied to the discomfort Questionnaire on pelvic floor (IDPE-20) for evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) complaints, anorectal symptoms and urinary incontinence, and the Sexual Questionnaire for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (PISQ -12) for evaluation of sexual function. Both questionnaires have already been validated for the Portuguese language and are specific for women with PFMD. The pelvic floor impact questionnaire (PFIQ-7) will also be applied to assess the impact of PFMD on quality of life, daily living activities and emotional health. For the evaluation of general QOL, the EORTC questionnaire QLQ-C30 and its specific module for patients with CC, QLQ-CX24 will be used. The evaluation of PFM function will include vaginal palpation (Modified Oxford Scale) and perineometry (Peritron).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • São Paulo
      • Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, 14040-900
        • University of Sao Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Women with CC with and without PFMD and women without CC with and without PFMD.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women diagnosed with CC; No distinction as to age, race, scholarity and religion; Women in follow-up at Clinical Hospital of Medical School of Ribeirão Preto of University São Paulo.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who did not complete the proposed cancer treatment; Women who presented CC as the second malignant neoplasm; Pregnant women; Failure to respond to the proposed questionnaires.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Group 1
Patients with CC with PFMD.
Other: Assessment of the pelvic floor function
Vaginal palpation and perineometry.
Other: Questionnaire application
Questionnaires: EORTC, WHOQoL-BREF, PFID-20; PSIQ-12 and PFIQ-7.
Group 2
Patients with CC without PFMD.
Other: Assessment of the pelvic floor function
Vaginal palpation and perineometry.
Other: Questionnaire application
Questionnaires: EORTC, WHOQoL-BREF, PFID-20; PSIQ-12 and PFIQ-7.
Group 3
Patients without CC with PFMD.
Other: Assessment of the pelvic floor function
Vaginal palpation and perineometry.
Other: Questionnaire application
Questionnaires: EORTC, WHOQoL-BREF, PFID-20; PSIQ-12 and PFIQ-7.
Group 4
Patients without CC without PFMD.
Other: Assessment of the pelvic floor function
Vaginal palpation and perineometry.
Other: Questionnaire application
Questionnaires: EORTC, WHOQoL-BREF, PFID-20; PSIQ-12 and PFIQ-7.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pelvic floor muscles function
Time Frame: Four months
Evaluated through vaginal palpation and perineometry.
Four months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life in the pelvic floor muscles dysfunction.
Time Frame: Four months
Evaluated through application of the questionnaire PFIQ-7.
Four months
Prevalence of the pelvic floor muscles dysfunction.
Time Frame: Four months
Evaluated through application of the questionnaires PSIQ-12 and PFID-20.
Four months
Overall quality of life.
Time Frame: Four months
Evaluated through application of the questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 and its specific module for patients with CC, QLQ-CX24 and the WHOQoL-BREF questionnaire.
Four months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Sao Paulo

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Harley Oliveira, PhD, University of Sao Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 2, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 14, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 18, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 5557/2017

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Cancer

Clinical Trials on Assessment of the pelvic floor function

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings