A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ASP5094 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Methotrexate

October 29, 2024 updated by: Astellas Pharma Inc

A Phase 2a, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ASP5094 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Methotrexate

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of ASP5094 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with background methotrexate (MTX).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study drug will be intravenously administered.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Asahikawa, Japan
        • Site JP00002
      • Asahikawa, Japan
        • Site JP00027
      • Beppu, Japan
        • Site JP00029
      • Chiba, Japan
        • Site JP00015
      • Fukuoka, Japan
        • Site JP00008
      • Fukuoka, Japan
        • Site JP00009
      • Fukuoka, Japan
        • Site JP00026
      • Ichinomiya, Japan
        • Site JP00016
      • Kanuma, Japan
        • Site JP00012
      • Kawachinagano, Japan
        • Site JP00028
      • Kitamoto, Japan
        • Site JP00005
      • Kobe, Japan
        • Site JP00025
      • Kobe, Japan
        • Site JP00030
      • Kumamoto, Japan
        • Site JP00010
      • Kyoto, Japan
        • Site JP00006
      • Meguro, Japan
        • Site JP00018
      • Nagano, Japan
        • Site JP00020
      • Nagoya, Japan
        • Site JP00014
      • Oita, Japan
        • Site JP00011
      • Okayama, Japan
        • Site JP00022
      • Osaki, Japan
        • Site JP00003
      • Sagamihara, Japan
        • Site JP00019
      • Sanuki, Japan
        • Site JP00007
      • Sapporo, Japan
        • Site JP00001
      • Shimonoseki, Japan
        • Site JP00023
      • Shizuoka, Japan
        • Site JP00021
      • Takasaki, Japan
        • Site JP00004
      • Tomakomai, Japan
        • Site JP00017
      • Toyohashi, Japan
        • Site JP00013
      • Tsukuba, Japan
        • Site JP00024
      • Yokohama, Japan
        • Site JP00031

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has RA diagnosed according to the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria or the 2010 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria at least 6 months prior to screening.
  • Subject meets the 1991 ACR Revised Criteria for the Classification of Global Functional Status in RA Class I, II, or III at screening.
  • At screening and baseline, subject has active RA as evidenced by both of the following:

    • ≥ 6 tender/painful joints (using 68-joint assessment)
    • ≥ 6 swollen joints (using 66-joint assessment)
  • Subject meets the criterion for a CRP level (Latex Agglutination method) at screening.
  • Subject who has continuously received Methotrexate for at least 90 days prior to screening and who is able to continue a stable dose of Methotrexate from at least 28 days prior to screening throughout the study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has deviated from the criteria for previous and concomitant treatment before baseline.
  • Subject has an ongoing infection requiring antibiotics.
  • Subject is determined to be an inadequate responder to a prior biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors.
  • Subject has participated in previous ASP5094 clinical trial.
  • Subject has participated in a clinical trial or post-marketing clinical study of another ethical drug or medical device within 12 weeks (84 days).
  • Subject has another inflammatory arthritis than RA, or any other articular symptom which may affect on joint assessment.
  • Subject meets any of the criteria for laboratory values at screening.
  • Subject has a positive T-SPOT or QuantiFERON Gold test within 90 days prior to screening or at screening.
  • Subject has a history of or concurrent malignant tumor.
  • Subject has autoimmune disease except for RA or any severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, metabolic, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological, or mental illness.
  • Subject has a history of clinically significant allergy.
  • Subject has clinically significant abnormalities on 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) at screening.
  • Subject has a history of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection.
  • Subject had surgery within 30 days prior to screening or has a planned elective surgery.
  • Subject has a wound that is currently healing at baseline.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ASP5094 Group
To be intravenously administered ASP5094 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with methotrexate.
intravenously administration
MTX must have been continuously orally administered for at least 90 days prior to screening, with stable dosage for at least 28 days prior to screening, and will be continuously administered with the same dosage throughout the study period.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Group
To be intravenously administered ASP5094 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with methotrexate.
MTX must have been continuously orally administered for at least 90 days prior to screening, with stable dosage for at least 28 days prior to screening, and will be continuously administered with the same dosage throughout the study period.
intravenously administration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ACR50 response rate
Time Frame: Week 12
To assess ACR (American College of Rheumatology) 50 for efficacy
Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ACR50 response rate
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess ACR (American College of Rheumatology) 50 for efficacy
Up to Week 16
ACR20 response rate
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess ACR (American College of Rheumatology) 20 for efficacy
Up to Week 16
ACR70 response rate
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess ACR (American College of Rheumatology) 70 for efficacy
Up to Week 16
Change from baseline in DAS28-CRP score
Time Frame: Baseline and Up to Week 16
To assess DAS28-CRP (Disease Activity Score28 - C-reactive protein) for efficacy
Baseline and Up to Week 16
Change from baseline in DAS28-ESR score
Time Frame: Baseline and Up to Week 16
To assess DAS28-ESR (Disease Activity Score28 - Erythrocyte sedimentation rate) for efficacy
Baseline and Up to Week 16
Change from baseline in Tender Joint Count (68 joints)
Time Frame: Baseline and Up to Week 16
To assess Tender Joint Count for efficacy
Baseline and Up to Week 16
Change from baseline in Swollen Joint Count (66 joints)
Time Frame: Baseline and Up to Week 16
To assess Swollen Joint Count for efficacy
Baseline and Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving DAS28-CRP score for remission (<2.6)
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess DAS28-CRP score for efficacy
Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving DAS28-ESR score for remission (<2.6)
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess DAS28-ESR score for efficacy
Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving DAS28-CRP score for low disease activity (≦3.2)
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess DAS28-CRP score for efficacy
Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving DAS28-ESR score for low disease activity (≦3.2)
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess DAS28-ESR score for efficacy
Up to Week 16
Change from baseline in CRP
Time Frame: Baseline and Up to Week 16
To assess CRP (C-reactive protein) for efficacy
Baseline and Up to Week 16
Change from baseline in ESR
Time Frame: Baseline and Up to Week 16
To assess ESR (Erythrocyte sedimentation rate) for efficacy
Baseline and Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving EULAR response criteria of "Good Response"
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess EULAR (European league Against Rheumatism) response criteria for efficacy
Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving EULAR response criteria of "Good Response" or "Moderate Response"
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess EULAR response criteria for efficacy
Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving ACR/EULAR score for remission
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess ACR/EULAR remission for efficacy
Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving SDAI score ≦ 3.3 (SDAI remission)
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) score for efficacy
Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving CDAI score ≦ 2.8 (CDAI remission)
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) score for efficacy
Up to Week 16
Change from baseline for the HAQ-DI
Time Frame: Baseline to Up to Week 16
To assess HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index) for efficacy
Baseline to Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
Adverse events will be coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA).
Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by laboratory tests: Hematology
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess hematology as a criteria of safety variables.
Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by laboratory tests: Biochemistry
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess Biochemistry as a criteria of safety variables.
Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by laboratory tests: Urinalysis
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess Urinalysis as a criteria of safety variables.
Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by vital signs: Body temperature
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess the vital sign as a criteria of safety variables.
Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by vital signs: Sitting blood pressure
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess the vital sign as a criteria of safety variables.
Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by vital signs: pulse rate
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess the vital sign as a criteria of safety variables.
Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by weight
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess the weight as a criteria of safety variables.
Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by standard 12-lead electrocardiogram
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess the cardiovascular system functioning as a criteria of safety variables.
Up to Week 16
Serum concentration of ASP5094
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess Serum concentration of ASP5094 for pharmacokinetics
Up to Week 16
Serum concentration of TNF-α
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess TNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor-α) for pharmacodynamics
Up to Week 16
Serum concentration of MMP3
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess MMP3 (Matrix metalloproteinase 3) for pharmacodynamics
Up to Week 16
Serum concentration of IL-6
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess IL-6 (Interleukin-6) for pharmacodynamics
Up to Week 16
Anti-ASP5094 anti-bodies
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
To assess Anti-ASP5094 anti-bodies for immunogenicity
Up to Week 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Medical Director, Astellas Pharma Inc

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 29, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 19, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 16, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Clinical Trials on ASP5094

Search Similar Trials