A Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Elamipretide Primary Mitochondrial Myopathy Followed by Open-Label Extension (MMPOWER-3)

January 16, 2022 updated by: Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.

A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Daily Subcutaneous Injections of Elamipretide in Subjects With Primary Mitochondrial Myopathy Followed by an Open-Label Treatment Extension

This is a multicenter phase 3 randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of daily subcutaneous injections of elamipretide in subjects with primary mitochondrial myopathy. This will be followed by an open-label treatment extension.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Part 11 is a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled assessment of the efficacy and safety of single daily subcutaneous (SC) doses of 40 mg elamipretide (vs placebo) administered with the elamipretide delivery system as a treatment for subjects with primary mitochondrial myopathy (PMM). Part 2 was to assess the long-term safety and tolerability of single daily SC doses of 40 mg elamipretide administered with the elamipretide delivery system for up to 144 weeks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
218

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • British Colombia
      • Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada
        • Adult Metabolic Diseases Clinic
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • McMaster University Medical Center
  • Denmark
      • Copenhagen, Denmark, DK-2100
        • Copenhagen neuromuscular center
  • Germany
      • Bonn, Germany, 53105
        • University Hospital of Bonn
      • Munich, Germany, 80336
        • Klinikum der Universität München, Friedrich-Baur Institute
  • Hungary
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1083
        • Institute of Genomic Medicine and Rare Disorders
  • Italy
      • Bologna, Italy, 40139
        • IRCCS Institute of Neorological Sciences of Bologna, Bellaria Hospital
      • Messina, Italy, 98125
        • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico G. Martino
      • Milan, Italy, 20133
        • Istituto Nazionale Neurologico Carlo Besta
      • Pisa, Italy, 56126
        • Dipartimento Ambientale di Neuroscienze
      • Rome, Italy, 00165
        • Ospedale Pediatrico Bambin Gesù
      • Rome, Italy, 00168
        • Istituto di Neurologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli
  • United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom
        • MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases
      • Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
        • Royal Victoria Infirmary
  • United States
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92093
        • University of California San Diego
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Stanford University
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Children's Hospital Colorado
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30318
        • Rare Disease Research, LLC
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Akron, Ohio, United States, 44308
        • Akron Children's Hospital
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinical Neurological Institute
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15224
        • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • University of Texas Health Science Center
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105
        • Seattle Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

PART 1:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willing and able to provide a signed informed consent form prior to participation in any trial-related procedures
  • Agrees to adhere to the trial requirements for the length of the trial, including the use of the elamipretide delivery system
  • Subject is ≥ 16 and ≤ 80 years of age
  • Diagnosed with PMM in the opinion of the investigator and confirmed by an Adjudication Committee
  • Woman of childbearing potential must agree to use a highly effective method of birth control

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has myopathic signs and or/symptoms due to a neuropathic process or gait problem that would interfere with the 6 minute walk test (6MWT), in the opinion of the Investigator
  • Female who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or breastfeeding/lactating
  • At Screening, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m^2
  • Subject has undergone an in-patient hospitalization within the 30 days prior to the Baseline Visit or has a planned hospitalization or a surgical procedure during the trial.
  • Subject has clinically significant cardiac disease or prior interventional procedure and/or respiratory disease (medical history or current clinical findings) within 3 months of the Baseline Visit, in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • Subject has QTc elongation (using the correction factor utilized at the clinical site) defined as a QTc >450 msec in male subjects and >480 msec in female subjects.

  • ECG evidence of acute ischemia, atrial fibrillation, or active conduction system abnormalities with the exception of any of the following:

    1. First degree Atrioventricular bock (AV-block)
    2. Second degree AV-block Type 1 (Mobitz Type 1 / Wenckebach type)
    3. Right bundle branch block
  • Subject has severe vision impairment that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with their ability to complete all trial requirements
  • Subject has a seizure disorder that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with their ability to complete all trial requirements.
  • Active malignancy or any other cancer from which the subject has been disease-free for < 2 years.
  • Subject has a solid organ transplant and/or is currently receiving treatment with therapy for immunosuppression, in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • Subject has been previously diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, or hepatitis C infection.
  • Subject has a history of a systemic eosinophilic illness and/or an eosinophil count >1,000 cells x10^6/L at the Screening Visit.
  • Subject is currently participating or has participated in an interventional clinical trial (i.e.,investigational product or device, stem cell therapy, gene therapy) within 30 days of the Baseline Visit; or is currently enrolled in a non-interventional clinical trial (except for SPIMM-300) at the Baseline Visit which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may be potentially confounding with results of the current trial (e.g., exercise therapy trial).
  • Subject has previously received elamipretide (MTP-131), for any reason.
  • Subject has a history of active substance abuse during the year before the Baseline Visit, in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • Subject has any prior or current medical condition that, in the judgment of the Investigator, would prevent the subject from safely participating in and/or completing all trial requirements.

PART 2:

Continuation Criteria:

  • Subjects must continue to be able and willing to adhere to the trial requirements.
  • Subject is appropriate to continue in Part 2 (i.e. subject was compliant in Part 1), in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • Subject has not had a serious adverse event (SAE)/serious adverse device effect (SADE) attributed to the elamipretide delivery system.
  • Subject has not permanently discontinued the elamipretide delivery system.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Part 1: Elamipretide
40 mg (0.5mL) elamipretide subcutaneous (SC) daily
Combination product: elamipretide
40 mg of elamipretide administered as once daily 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections for 24 weeks using the elamipretide delivery system
Other Names:
  • MTP-131
Placebo Comparator: Part 1: Placebo
Placebo SC daily
Combination product: placebo comparator
40 mg of placebo administered as once daily 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections for 24 weeks using the elamipretide delivery system
Other Names:
  • Placebo
Experimental: Part 2: Elamipretide open label
Elamepretide 40 mg (0.5 mL) SC daily
Combination product: elamipretide open label treatment
40 mg of elamipretide administered as once daily 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections for up to 144 weeks using the elamipretide delivery system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in Distance Walked (meters) on the Six-Minute Walk Test by Visit
Baseline to 24 weeks
Total Fatigue Score on the on the Primary Mitochondrial Myopathy Symptom Assessment (PMMSA)
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Change from Baseline in Total fatigue score on the on the Primary Mitochondrial Myopathy Symptom Assessment (PMMSA) by visit. Each individual item score ranges from 1 (none) to 4 (severe). The total fatigue score ranges from 4-16. Lower values represent a better outcome. The total fatigue score is the sum of question 1 through question 4 on the Primary Mitochondrial Myopathy Symptom Assessment.
Baseline to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue During Activities Score on the Primary Mitochondrial Disease Symptom Assessment (PMMSA).
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Change from baseline in Fatigue During Activities. Fatigue During Activities is the sum of question 2 (tiredness during activities) and question 4 (muscle weakness during activities.) The four response options are: 1=Not at all, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Raw scores for each subject range from 2-8. A lower score means a better outcome, with less fatigue. A higher score means a worse outcome, with more fatigue.
Baseline to 24 weeks
Neuro-QoL Fatigue Activities of Daily Living
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in Neuro-QoL Fatigue Activities of Daily Living by Visit. Each individual item score ranges from 1-5. Total raw score for the entire item bank ranges from 19-95. Raw scores will be calibrated using Item Response Theory Model. Lower values represent a better outcome. Individual items will be summed to calculate total scores.
Baseline to 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in the Most Bothersome Symptom Score on the Primary Mitochondrial Myopathy Symptoms Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
The item score rangers from 1 (none) to 4 (severe). Lower values represent a better outcome. The most bothersome score is the average of the identified most bothersome symptom of the Primary Mitochondrial Myopathy Symptom Assessment by each subject.
Baseline to 24 weeks
Neuro-QoL Fatigue Short Form Score
Time Frame: 24 Weeks
Change From Baseline in Neuro-QoL Fatigue - Short Form: Total T-Scores by Visit. The Neuro-QoL Fatigue Short Form is comprised of the sum of the first 8 questions of the Neuro-QoL Item Bank v1.0 - Fatigue. Each question is scored as following: 1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, and 5=Always. The questions include: I felt exhausted, I felt that I had no energy, I felt fatigued, I was too tired to do my household chores, I was too tired to leave the house, I was frustrated by being too tired to do the things I wanted to do, I felt tired, and I had to limit my social activity because I was tired. T-scores are calculated from the short form scoring table provided by the instrument authors (Neuro-QoL User Manual, 2015). T-score distributions rescale raw scores into standardized scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Change from baseline: Negative numbers mean less fatigue, better outcome, positive score means more fatigue, worse outcome.
24 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 9, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 24, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 16, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SPIMM-301

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Mitochondrial Myopathy

Clinical Trials on elamipretide

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings