A Study of Protein Metabolism, Microbiome and Investigational Probiotic Use in Patients With ALS

July 1, 2019 updated by: Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center

A Study of Protein Metabolism, Microbiome and Investigational Probiotic Use in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

ALS, also known as "Lou Gehrig's" disease, is a neurodegenerative disease which is fatal. Treatment for ALS is limited and currently consists of primary symptom relief or support. In addition, time from diagnosis to death averages 3-5 years. New Biotic, LLC has submitted an Orphan Drug Designation Application for an investigational probiotic and have indicated the need for more study of this orphaned drug in ALS patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This will be an exploratory protocol of 10 patients and expect to screen approximately 25-30 patients.

The purpose of our study is to examine amino acid levels in plasma pre and post prandial as well as longitudinal gut microbiome in ALS patients taking the investigational probiotic.

  1. Purpose: Evaluate the clinical outcomes of muscle strength, clinical global assessments and spasticity in patients taking an Investigational probiotic.
  2. Measure changes in questionnaires relating to subjective functional assessments, quality of life, and pain levels over 24 weeks.
  3. Describe plasma amino acid levels before and after a protein food challenge in ALS patients of spinal and bulbar type.
  4. Evaluate and describe the gut microbiome of patients with ALS.

Design:

This is a non-randomized, open-label, two-group pilot study of plasma amino acid levels, gut microbiome, and of investigational probiotic use in patients with ALS. Participants will be placed into two groups based on certain post-prandial amino acid levels. Patients will be stratified for eligibility based on the results of their amino acid profiles.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
5

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • South Dakota
      • Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57105
        • Avera Medical Group Palliative Medicine Sioux Falls

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of sporadic ALS, definite or probable disease,-revised El Escorial criteria
  • Patient must be able to understand the purpose and procedures of the study, sign informed consent and comply with requirements of the protocol.
  • Age 18 and older.
  • Normal serum Magnesium (1.7 - 2.3 mg/dL) and Manganese (4.7 - 18.3 ng/mL) levels or adequate supplement to obtain normal serum Mg (if Manganese levels are low (<1.7 mg/dL), Hair Manganese will be evaluated before starting probiotic, and inclusion to the protocol will be at the principal investigators discretion).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Need for consumption of frequent antibiotics, gut pH increasing medications, and/or alkaline water.
  • Patient unable to maintain regular follow up or submit to informed consent
  • Stool pH >7.5 - The ideal stool pH for growth and function of the investigational probiotic is 6-6.5.
  • Patients who are judged to be ineligible for study entry by investigator or sub-investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: High Amino Acid levels

Comparison between high amino acid levels and low amino acid levels of clinical global assessments, muscle strength and spasticity and functional assessments.

Patients taking proprietary probiotic
Dietary supplement: probiotic
a proprietary probiotic formulation
Experimental: Low Amino Acid levels

Comparison between high amino acid levels and low amino acid levels of clinical global assessments, muscle strength and spasticity and functional assessments.

Patients taking proprietary probiotic
Dietary supplement: probiotic
a proprietary probiotic formulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate amino acid levels before and after probiotic use.
Time Frame: 6 months
Amino acid profiles will be compared before the probiotic use and over a period of treatment for 6 months.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measure changes in questionnaires relating to subjective functional assessments.
Time Frame: 6 months

Changes will be measured with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis -Functional Rating Scale (ALS-FRS).

The ALS-FRS is a 12 item questionnaire to assess bulbar, limb, and respiratory functions. The scores may range from 0, which is the worst function, to 48 which is the best function. This questionnaire is self-administered, and can be completed with assistance from a family member. The scores range from 0-48. The highest scores reflect no changes, or difficulty with tasks assessed. Low scores indicate poor functioning and need for assistance.
6 months
Measure changes in Quality of Life.
Time Frame: 6 months
Changes will be measured with the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis -Quality of Life questionnaire. The ALS-QOL is a 50-item, self-administered, questionnaire which includes 7 scores. These scores represent six domains and a total average score. The six domains are 1) Negative Emotion, 2) Interaction, 3) Intimacy, 4) Religiosity, 5) Physical and 6) Bulbar.
6 months
Evaluate pain levels with the Numbered Pain Scale.
Time Frame: 6 months
Changes in pain rating of 0 - 10 will be collected during the 6 months of study.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Francine Arneson, MD, Avera Medical Group Palliative Medicine Sioux Falls

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 26, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 26, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 2, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 1, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AIHG-2017.004-ALS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on probiotic

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings