Myelodysplastic Syndrome--CDA-2 Hematological Improvement National Affirmation Study (MD-CHINA)

November 4, 2017 updated by: Wu Depei, Chinese Society of Hematology

The Efficacy and Safety of CDA-2 for the Treatment of IPSS Lower/Intermediate-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients: a Multi-centered Prospective Open Study

This Study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CDA-2 in the treatment of International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Lower/Intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in Chinese patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with lower/intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) have rare therapeutic options other than supportive care. In pilot studies, CDA-2 showed promising results of hematological improvement in these patients.

To date, the optimal regimen for CDA-2 treatment is not well established. The researchers are going to make a multi-centered clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CDA-2 in 800 patients with International Prognostic Scoring System(IPSS) Lower/Intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Eligible patients will be given CDA-2 intravenously, with 200 ml each day for 14 consecutive days in every four weeks (one cycle). The treatment will be repeated at least for 3 cycles. The patients will be followed up to 24 weeks.

The primary endpoint is hematological improvement (HI) at 12 weeks according to IWG criteria. Full blood counts will be done on all patients every week. Change in bone marrow function as measured by changes in bone marrow morphology and cytogenetics will be assessed before and after 3 cycles of the treatment.

The secondary endpoint is the therapy response. Complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR) and response duration, side effects, evaluation of QOL will be evaluated at the end of the treatment in every cycle.

Adverse events of the treatment will be recorded for evaluation of the safety.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
800

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented diagnosis of MDS according to World Health Organization (WHO)/French American British (FAB) classification that meets IPSS-R classification of low, or intermediate-1 risk disease.
  • Subject is 18 to 85years of age the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF).
  • Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, 1, or 2.
  • Laboratory test results within these ranges: Serum creatinine </=1.5 mg/dL x Upper limit of the normal (ULN),Blood urine nitrogen (BUN)</=1.5 mg/dL x Upper limit of the normal (ULN),Total bilirubin </=1.5 mg/dL x Upper limit of the normal (ULN),Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase/aspartate transaminase (SGOT/AST) and Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase/alanine transaminase (SGPT/ALT)</=2 x Upper limit of the normal (ULN).
  • No prior intensive combination chemotherapy or dose Azacitidine,Decitabine,and Lenalidomide,etc.
  • Capable of understanding the investigational nature, potential risks and benefits of the study, and able to provide valid informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • IPSS risk group intermediate-2 or high risk
  • breast feeding and pregnant women
  • MDS associated with del 5q cytogenetic abnormality
  • Patients with history of hepatitis B, C, HIV(+), alcoholic liver disease or evidence of hepatopathy will be excluded.
  • Any significant concurrent disease, illness, or psychiatric disorder that would compromise patient safety or compliance, interfere with consent, study participation, follow up, or interpretation of study results.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: CDA-2 (Cell Differentiation Agent 2)
Patients will be given CDA-2 therapy.
Drug: CDA-2 (Cell Differentiation Agent 2)
CDA-2 will be given intravenously, with 200 ml each day for 14 consecutive days in every four weeks (one cycle). The treatment will be repeated at least for 3 cycles.
Other Names:
  • Uroacitides (a compound mixed of peptides and organic acids)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hematological Improvement (HI) at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Hematologic improvement (HI) per International Working Group (IWG),HI: hemoglobin increase of >= 1.5 g/dL, platelet increase of >= 30,000/mL (starting with > 20,000/mL), neutrophils increase of >= 100% and > 500/μL.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response Rate of The Therapy at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
IWG 2006 response criteria - CR: bone marrow evaluation shows <= 5% blasts; normal maturation of all cells lines (mCR), peripheral blood evaluation shows hemoglobin >= 11 g/dL, neutrophils >= 1000/mL, platelets >= 100,000/mL, 0% blasts; PR: Same as CR, except blasts decrease >= 50%, still greater than 5% in bone marrow
12 weeks
Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) in 24 weeks
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Proportion of subjects who are Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion free over any consecutive 84-day period within 24 weeks
24 weeks
Change From Baseline to that of the 24 weeks of Scores of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C-30) Physical Functioning Scale
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The EORTC QLQ will be evaluated for each patients at the beginning and end of the study.
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chinese Society of Hematology

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Harbin Institute of Hematology & Oncology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 4, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 4, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CDA-2 MDS-2017

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Clinical Trials on CDA-2 (Cell Differentiation Agent 2)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings