Myelodysplastic Syndrome--CDA-2 Hematological Improvement National Affirmation Study (MD-CHINA)

November 4, 2017 updated by: Wu Depei, Chinese Society of Hematology

The Efficacy and Safety of CDA-2 for the Treatment of IPSS Lower/Intermediate-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients: a Multi-centered Prospective Open Study

This Study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CDA-2 in the treatment of International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Lower/Intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in Chinese patients.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

Patients with lower/intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) have rare therapeutic options other than supportive care. In pilot studies, CDA-2 showed promising results of hematological improvement in these patients.

To date, the optimal regimen for CDA-2 treatment is not well established. The researchers are going to make a multi-centered clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CDA-2 in 800 patients with International Prognostic Scoring System(IPSS) Lower/Intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Eligible patients will be given CDA-2 intravenously, with 200 ml each day for 14 consecutive days in every four weeks (one cycle). The treatment will be repeated at least for 3 cycles. The patients will be followed up to 24 weeks.

The primary endpoint is hematological improvement (HI) at 12 weeks according to IWG criteria. Full blood counts will be done on all patients every week. Change in bone marrow function as measured by changes in bone marrow morphology and cytogenetics will be assessed before and after 3 cycles of the treatment.

The secondary endpoint is the therapy response. Complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR) and response duration, side effects, evaluation of QOL will be evaluated at the end of the treatment in every cycle.

Adverse events of the treatment will be recorded for evaluation of the safety.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

800

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented diagnosis of MDS according to World Health Organization (WHO)/French American British (FAB) classification that meets IPSS-R classification of low, or intermediate-1 risk disease.
  • Subject is 18 to 85years of age the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF).
  • Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, 1, or 2.
  • Laboratory test results within these ranges: Serum creatinine </=1.5 mg/dL x Upper limit of the normal (ULN),Blood urine nitrogen (BUN)</=1.5 mg/dL x Upper limit of the normal (ULN),Total bilirubin </=1.5 mg/dL x Upper limit of the normal (ULN),Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase/aspartate transaminase (SGOT/AST) and Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase/alanine transaminase (SGPT/ALT)</=2 x Upper limit of the normal (ULN).
  • No prior intensive combination chemotherapy or dose Azacitidine,Decitabine,and Lenalidomide,etc.
  • Capable of understanding the investigational nature, potential risks and benefits of the study, and able to provide valid informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • IPSS risk group intermediate-2 or high risk
  • breast feeding and pregnant women
  • MDS associated with del 5q cytogenetic abnormality
  • Patients with history of hepatitis B, C, HIV(+), alcoholic liver disease or evidence of hepatopathy will be excluded.
  • Any significant concurrent disease, illness, or psychiatric disorder that would compromise patient safety or compliance, interfere with consent, study participation, follow up, or interpretation of study results.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: CDA-2 (Cell Differentiation Agent 2)
Patients will be given CDA-2 therapy.
CDA-2 will be given intravenously, with 200 ml each day for 14 consecutive days in every four weeks (one cycle). The treatment will be repeated at least for 3 cycles.
Other Names:
  • Uroacitides (a compound mixed of peptides and organic acids)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hematological Improvement (HI) at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Hematologic improvement (HI) per International Working Group (IWG),HI: hemoglobin increase of >= 1.5 g/dL, platelet increase of >= 30,000/mL (starting with > 20,000/mL), neutrophils increase of >= 100% and > 500/μL.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response Rate of The Therapy at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
IWG 2006 response criteria - CR: bone marrow evaluation shows <= 5% blasts; normal maturation of all cells lines (mCR), peripheral blood evaluation shows hemoglobin >= 11 g/dL, neutrophils >= 1000/mL, platelets >= 100,000/mL, 0% blasts; PR: Same as CR, except blasts decrease >= 50%, still greater than 5% in bone marrow
12 weeks
Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) in 24 weeks
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Proportion of subjects who are Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion free over any consecutive 84-day period within 24 weeks
24 weeks
Change From Baseline to that of the 24 weeks of Scores of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C-30) Physical Functioning Scale
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The EORTC QLQ will be evaluated for each patients at the beginning and end of the study.
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Clinical Trials on CDA-2 (Cell Differentiation Agent 2)

3
Subscribe