Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for SARS-CoV-2-related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

April 29, 2020 updated by: Royan Institute

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Coronavirus Infection: A Phase 2-3 Clinical Trial

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is the major cause of death in the COVID-19 pandemic. In this trial, the safety and efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC) for the treatment of ARDS in COVID-19 patients will be assessed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the major cause of death in the COVID 19 infection pandemic. It is a devastating clinical condition, caused by an acute and diffuse lung injury that requires management in the intensive care unit. It is caused by uncontrolled inflammation that leads to severe pulmonary alveolar damage and capillary membrane leakage, and progressive respiratory failure. There is no effective treatment for ARDS and the only supportive care strategies are the mainstay of therapy. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have high regenerative and immunomodulatory capacities. In preclinical research, ARDS, MSCs modulate the inflammatory response, augment tissue repair, enhance pathogen clearance, and reduce the severity of the injury, pulmonary dysfunction, and apoptosis. Moreover, many studies have shown that the anti-inflammatory effects of MSCs can significantly reduce virus (e.g., Influenza)-induced lung injury and mortality in animals. Since 2014 clinical trials are using MSC from variable sources [bone marrow (BM), fat, and umbilical cord (UC)] in the treatment of ARDS. Some of the clinical trials are ongoing and the final reports are not reported. In all final reports, the safety of the application of MSC has been documented and most of them implied improvement in mortality and decrease of morbidity. Moreover, experimental studies have demonstrated that MSCs or their extracellular vesicles (MSCs-EVs) significantly reduced lung inflammation and pathological impairment resulting from different types of lung injury. Also, macrophage phagocytosis, bacterial killing, and the outcome are improved. It is highly likely that MSCs-EVs have the same therapeutic effect on inoculation pneumonia as MSCs themselves.

Critically ill coronavirus documented cases suspicious to ARDS (mild or moderate) will be enrolled in the study. Our previous experiment (IRCT20200217046526N1) showed the safety of 3 injections of MSCs in patients with COVID-19. This multi-center trial will recruit 60 patients. All patients in all groups will receive conventional therapy for virus treatment and supportive care for ARDS.

The patients allocated randomly to three groups:

Control (n=20). Patients will conventional therapy for virus treatment and supportive care for ARDS will be used as control.

Intervention Group1 (n=20). Patients will receive two doses of MSCs 100×10e6 (±10%), at Day 0 and Day 2 intravenously.

Intervention Group 2 (n=20). Patients will receive two doses of MSCs 100×10e6 (±10%), at Day 0 and Day 2 plus two doses of extracellular vesicles (EVs) on Day 4 and Day 6 intravenously.

The clinical symptoms, pulmonary imaging, side effects, 28-days mortality inflammatory factors, etc. will be evaluated during the 28 days follow up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmation of 2019-nCoV infection by RT-PCR
  • Diagnosis of ARDS according to the Berlin definition of ARDS
  • Requiring supplemental oxygen
  • Pneumonia that is judged by chest radiograph or CT
  • PaO2/oxygen absorption concentration (FiO2) ≤ 300MMHG
  • Pulmonary imaging shows that the focused progress > 50% in 24-48 hours
  • Mild to Moderate 2019-nCoV pneumonia/ stay in the ICU <48 hours
  • SOFA score between 2-3 point

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe allergies or allergies after 1st injection to stem cell preparations and their components
  • Patients with a malignant tumor, other serious systemic diseases, and psychosis
  • Co-Infection of HIV, tuberculosis, influenza virus, adenovirus, and other respiratory infection viruses
  • Patients with a previous history of pulmonary embolism
  • Be thought by researchers to be inappropriate to participate in this clinical study (Expected deaths within 48 hours, uncontrolled infections)
  • Liver or kidney SOFA score of more than 3 points; combined with other organ failures (need organ support), Stage 4 severe chronic kidney disease or requiring dialysis (i.e. estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30)
  • Pulmonary obstructive pneumonia, severe pulmonary interstitial fibrosis, alveolar proteinosis, allergic alveolitis, and other known viral pneumonia or bacterial pneumonia
  • Continuous use of immunosuppressive agents or organ transplants in the past 6 months
  • In vitro life support (ECMO, ECCO2R, RRT)
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Uncontrolled underlying disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Two MSC infusion
Intervention Group1(n=20). Patients will receive two doses of MSCs 100×10e6 (±10%) intravenously plus Conventional treatment.
Cell therapy protocol 1(n=20). Patients will receive two doses of MSCs 100×10e6 (±10%) at Day 0 and Day 2 plus Conventional treatment.
Experimental: Two MSC infusion Plus two EVs infusion
Intervention Group 2 (n=20). Patients will receive two doses of MSCs 100×10e6 (±10%), intravenously plus two doses of EVs plus Conventional treatment
Patients will receive two doses of MSCs 100×10e6 (±10%)at Day 0 and Day 2, intravenously plus two doses of EVs at Day 4 and Day 6 plus conventional treatment.
No Intervention: Control
Control (n=20). Patients will conventional therapy for virus treatment and supportive care for ARDS will be used as control.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events assessment
Time Frame: From baseline to day 28
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
From baseline to day 28
Blood oxygen saturation
Time Frame: From baseline to day 14
Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement
From baseline to day 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intensive care unit-free days
Time Frame: Up to day 8
Number of days
Up to day 8
Clinical symptoms
Time Frame: From baseline to day 14
Improvement of clinical symptoms including duration of fever, respiratory distress, pneumonia, cough, sneezing
From baseline to day 14
Respiratory efficacy
Time Frame: From baseline to day 7
increase in PaO2/FiO2 ratio from baseline to day 7
From baseline to day 7
Biomarkers concentrations in plasma
Time Frame: At baseline, 7, 14, 28 days after the first intervention
Biochemical examination
At baseline, 7, 14, 28 days after the first intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Abdol Hossein Shahverdi, Royan Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Hossein Baharvand, Professor, Department of Stem Cells Biology and Technology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cells Biology & Technology, Iran

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 5, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 6, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers and clinicians

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid-19

Clinical Trials on Cell therapy protocol 1

Subscribe