Treatment of Acute Sinusitis With High-Dose vs. Standard-Dose Amoxicillin/Clavulanate

July 19, 2021 updated by: Paul Sorum, MD

Treatment of Acute Sinusitis With High-Dose vs. Standard-Dose Amoxicillin/Clavulanate: A Confirmation Study

Comparative-effectiveness study of the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis with amoxicillin/clavulanate 875mg/125mg bid for 7 days with or without the addition of immediate-release amoxicillin 875 mg bid x 7 days. .

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Double-blind comparative-effectiveness study of the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis with standard dose of amoxicillin/clavulanate 875mg/125mg bid for 7 days, as recommended by the Infectious Disease Society of America, with or without the addition of immediate-release amoxicillin 875 mg bid x 7 days. The study aims are 1) to confirm, or not, our recent findings of more rapid improvement in overall symptoms with the additional amoxicillin, but also of more frequent diarrhea and vaginal yeast infections and 2) to assess, from the participants' point of view, the balance between improvement and adverse effects.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
157

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Cohoes, New York, United States, 12047
        • Albany Medical Center Internal Medicine and Pediatrics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults 18 and older who are patients at the Albany Medical Center Internal Medicine and Pediatrics practice (study site).
  2. Clinical diagnosis of acute bacterial sinusitis in accordance with the guidelines of the Infectious Disease Society of America (fitting into one of 3 categories: persistent sinus symptoms for 10 days or more; severe sinus symptoms for 3 days or more; or worsening sinus symptoms after initial improvement (double sickening).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous enrollment in the current study
  2. Allergy or intolerance to any penicillin or to amoxicillin/clavulanate
  3. Serious hypersensitivity reaction to any beta lactam
  4. Elevated risk of amoxicillin-resistant bacteria: a. amoxicillin, penicillin, or other beta-lactam within the past month; b. known to have had methicillin-resistant Staph aureus
  5. Chronic or recurrent "sinus" problems (defined as a) persistent symptoms of "sinus" congestion, not attributed to nasal allergies, for 8 weeks or more or b) 2 or more episodes of antibiotic-treated "sinusitis" in past 3 months
  6. Need to use high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate or levofloxacin or to send to emergency department or to hospitalize because of a) signs of severe infection or b) immunocompromise
  7. Cognitive impairment, so unable to give reliable symptom ratings (even if a health proxy can give consent)
  8. Pregnant women and nursing mothers
  9. Drug warnings: a) taking allopurinol; b) current mononucleosis; c) chronic kidney disease stage 4 (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30); d) hepatic impairment (not including isolated transaminase elevated < 2 times upper limit of normal); e) history of antibiotic-associated colitis (C. difficile)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: High dose
Amoxicillin/clavulanate 875mg/125mg & amoxicillin 875 mg twice a day x 7 days
Drug: Amoxicillin 875 mg
Doubling the dose of amoxicillin by adding amoxicillin 875 to each dose of the standard treatment of amoxicillin/clavulanate 875/125
Other Names:
  • Amoxil
Active Comparator: Standard dose
Amoxicillin/clavulanate 875 mg/125mg & placebo (lactase) twice a day x 7 days.
Dietary supplement: Placebo (lactase)
Placebo (in place of additional amoxicillin in experimental arm)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With a Global Rating of Improvement of 5 & 6 at the End of 3 Days of Treatment
Time Frame: At end of 3 days of treatment
Rating on a scale of 1=a lot worse, 2=a little worse, 3=the same, 4=a little better, 5=a lot better, 6=no symptoms, with a higher score indicating greater improvement.
At end of 3 days of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With a Global Rating of Improvement of 5 or 6 at End of 10 Days Since Enrollment
Time Frame: At end of 10 days since enrollment
Rating of 5 (a lot better) or 6 (no symptoms) on Global Rating of Improvement scale, with range of 1 (a lot worse) to 6 (no symptoms), with a higher score indicating greater improvement
At end of 10 days since enrollment
Change From Baseline in the Total Score on the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 (SNOT-16) at the End of 3 Days of Treatment
Time Frame: At end of 3 days of treatment
The change between enrollment and the end of 3 days of treatment in the total score on the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 (SNOT-16). The total SNOT-16 is the sum of the participant's ratings of 16 symptoms of illness on the scale of 0 (no problem) to 3 (severe problem), with a possible range of 0 to 48, with a higher sum indicating more troubling symptoms. A decrease in total score would indicate an improvement in symptoms.
At end of 3 days of treatment
Change From Baseline in the Total Score on the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 (SNOT-16) at the End of 10 Days Since Enrollment
Time Frame: At end of 10 days since enrollment
The change between enrollment and the end of 10 days since enrollment in the total score on the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 (SNOT-16). The total SNOT-16 is the sum of the participant's ratings of 16 symptoms of illness on the scale of 0 (no problem) to 3 (severe problem), with a possible range of 0 to 48, with a higher sum indicating more troubling symptoms. A decrease in total score would indicate an improvement in symptoms.
At end of 10 days since enrollment
Balance of Benefits and Detriments
Time Frame: At end of 10 days since enrollment
Assessment of balance between good effects and bad effects of antibiotic on scale of -3=bad effects much greater than good effects to +3=good effects much greater than bad effects
At end of 10 days since enrollment
Number of Participants Answering "Yes" to Willingness to Take the Antibiotic Again in the Future
Time Frame: At end of 10 days since enrollment
Response of "yes" at the end of 10 days since enrollment to the question whether the participant would take this antibiotic again, with possible answers of yes, no, or uncertain.
At end of 10 days since enrollment

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Reporting Any Diarrhea at Day 3 Among Those Self-identified as Prone or Not Prone to Diarrhea
Time Frame: At the end of 3 days
Among those who indicated at enrollment whether prone to diarrhea or not, the number giving ratings of 1, 2, or 3 on diarrhea scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe)
At the end of 3 days
Number of Participants Reporting Severe Diarrhea at Day 3 Among Those Self-identified as Prone or Not Prone to Diarrhea
Time Frame: At end of day 3
Among those reporting proneness to diarrhea or not at enrollment, the number rating 3 on diarrhea scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe)
At end of day 3
Number of Participants Reporting Any Diarrhea at Day 10 Among Those Self-identified as Prone or Not Prone to Diarrhea
Time Frame: At 10 days since enrollment
Among those indicating at enrollment a proneness or not to diarrhea, the number giving ratings of 1, 2, or 3 on the diarrhea scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe)
At 10 days since enrollment
Number of Participants Reporting Severe Diarrhea at Day 10 Among Those Self-identified as Prone or Not Prone to Diarrhea
Time Frame: At 10 days since enrollment
Among those indicating proneness to diarrhea or not at enrollment, the number who gave a rating of 3 on the diarrhea scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe)
At 10 days since enrollment
Number of Female Participants Reporting Any Vaginal Symptoms at Day 3 Among Those Self-identified as Prone or Not Prone to Vaginal Itching or Discharge
Time Frame: After 3 days of treatment
Female participants contacted after 3 days of treatment were divided into two groups: those who had or had not reported at baseline a proneness to vaginal symptoms. The measure was the number in each group who gave ratings of 1, 2, or 3 on the vaginal symptoms scale, ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms.
After 3 days of treatment
Number of Female Participants Reporting Severe Vaginal Symptoms at Day 3 Among Those Self-identified as Prone or Not Prone to Vaginal Itching or Discharge
Time Frame: At the end of 3 days of treatment
Among female participants indicating a proneness or not to vaginal itching or discharge, the number of ratings of 3 on the vaginal symptom scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe)Female participants contacted after 3 days of treatment were divided into two groups: those who had or had not reported at baseline a proneness to vaginal symptoms. The measure was the number in each group who gave a rating of 1, 3 on the vaginal symptoms scale, ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms.
At the end of 3 days of treatment
Number of Female Participants Reporting Any Vaginal Symptoms at Day 10 Among Those Self-identified as Prone or Not Prone to Vaginal Itching or Discharge
Time Frame: At 10 days since enrollment
Female participants contacted after 10 days since enrollment were divided into two groups: those who had or had not reported at baseline a proneness to vaginal symptoms. The measure was the number in each group who gave ratings of 1, 2, or 3 on the vaginal symptoms scale, ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms.
At 10 days since enrollment
Number of Female Participants Reporting Severe Vaginal Symptoms at Day 10 Among Those Self-identified as Prone or Not Prone to Vaginal Itching or Discharge
Time Frame: At 10 days since enrollment
Female participants contacted at 10 days since enrollment were divided into two groups: those who had or had not reported at baseline a proneness to vaginal symptoms. The measure was the number in each group who gave rating of 3 on the vaginal symptoms scale, ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms.
At 10 days since enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Paul Sorum, MD

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Paul C Sorum, MD, PhD, Albany Medical College

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 26, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 19, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 4993

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

De-identified IPD will be made available to other researchers by contacting the corresponding author at sorump@amc.edu.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Immediately and indefinitely

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Contact the corresponding author at sorump@amc.edu

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sinusitis, Acute

Clinical Trials on Amoxicillin 875 mg

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings