Impact of Transmural Plastic Stent on Recurrence of Pancreatic Fluid Collection After Metal Stent Removal in Disconnected Pancreatic Duct

June 28, 2021 updated by: Mohan Ramchandani, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

Does Transmural Plastic Stenting Prevent the Recurrence of Pancreatic Fluid Collection After Metal Stent Removal in Walled Off Necrosis With Disconnected Pancreatic Duct Syndrome ? -Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Walled of necrosis (WON) is severe local complication of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome(DPDS) is commonly seen (50-60%) after necrotizing pancreatitis and has long term implication like recurrent pancreatic fluid collections (PFC)] requiring re-intervention. Incidence of recurrent PFC is more common in patients with DPDS (17-50%) compared to others. Studies has shown permanent in-dwelling transmural stent reduces recurrence of PFC (1.7% vs 17.4%, p<0.001). Nowadays,WON is effectively managed with endoscopic step up approach (96%). Several studies showed dedicated self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) are effective compared to the plastic stents in management of WON with decreased need of re-intervention. However, SEMS cannot be kept for longer duration because of associated adverse events. So, experts recommend to remove SEMS within 4-6 weeks of placement. Considering this background, study is planned with aim to see the effect of transmural plastic stenting on recurrence of PFC after SEMS removal in walled off necrosis with DPDS.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) is lethal complication and account for 10-20% of total pancreatitis. Necrotic collection is seen in majority of ANP and >50% of necrotic collection transform into Walled of necrosis (WON). Management of WON is challenging and under progressive evolution. With the advent of "step up approach" WON is effectively managed with greater success. Various studies and meta-analysis proved the efficacy of dedicated self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) over plastic stent in WON management. Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) is late complication of necrotizing pancreatitis and increasingly identified after necrosectomy. DPDS is defined as complete disruption of the main pancreatic duct, resulting in a variable portion of the upstream pancreatic gland becoming isolated from the main pancreatic duct downstream. Ductal disruption leads to accumulation of pancreatic juice forming pancreatic or peri-pancreatic fluid collection. Incidence of recurrence of PFC in DPD is ~ 50%. DPDS is a separate clinical entity which demands special strategic approach and requires frequent re-intervention (surgical/endoscopic). Treatment option for DPDS is controversial and not yet clearly defined. Studies have shown that long term transmural plastic stent placement can reduce the recurrence rate (Stent removed-17% vs stent left behind-1.7%). So, some experts recommend that transmural stents can be left in situ indefinitely to decrease recurrence of PFC. Nowadays, SEMS are widely used for management of WON. However, metal stents cannot be kept for longer period because of increasing adverse events associated with longer duration (impaction/burring of SEMS in gastric wall, bleeding). So, recommendation is to remove SEMS as early as possible (within 4-6 weeks of drainage). Considering this fact, study is planned to evaluate the effect of transmural plastic stenting on recurrence of PFC after SEMS removal in walled off necrosis with DPDS. This will be randomised control study in patients with WON with DPDS who underwent SEMS drainage. After removal of SEMS patients with documented DPDS (magnetic resonance pancreatography and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography) will be randomised into 2 arms. In study arm after SEMS removal transmural plastic stent will be placed in to the cavity and in control arm SEMS will be removed with no transmural stenting. Thereafter patients will be followed at 3 months,6 months and yearly.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • India
    • Andhra Pradesh
      • Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India, 500082
        • Asian Institute of Gastroenterology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All the patient who underwent EUS guided drainage with metal stent DPDS on MRCP & ERCP

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwillingness to give written informed consent MRCP/ERCP-PD stricture ? (mimics DPD), leak Bleeding diathesis (Coagulopathy & thrombocytopenia) chronic pancreatitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Transmural stenting
In patients of walled off necrosis with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome, metal stent will be removed at 3-4 weeks followed by transmural plastic stenting in the residual cavity.
Device: Transmural Plastic stenting
After metal stent removal in patients of disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome, transmural plastic- double pig tail stent will be placed into the residual necrotic cavity with the standard duodenoscope.
No Intervention: No stenting
In patients of walled off necrosis with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome, metal stent will be removed at 3-4 weeks without any further intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence of PFC
Time Frame: 3 months
In the study will see the re-ccurence of fluid collection in control and study arm
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical Success
Time Frame: 24 Months
complication associated with deployment of transmural plastic, stent migration,recurrence of pancreatic fluid collection at 6 months and 1 year,new onset diabetes mellitus
24 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 27, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 5, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 10, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 28, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AIG-006

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Pancreatitis Necrotizing

Clinical Trials on Transmural Plastic stenting

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings