A Novel Surgical Strategy to Reduce Major Complications in Patients With Necrotizing Pancreatitis

February 2, 2024 updated by: Yang Yang, Tianjin Nankai Hospital

A Novel Surgical Strategy to Reduce Major Complications in Patients With Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The goal of this observational study is to compare patient outcomes between the groups of patients admitted before and after the full implementation of the novel surgical strategy in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. The main question it aims to answer are:

• the efficacy and safety of the novel surgical strategy To assess the efficacy and safety of the novel surgical strategy, all included patients were divided into two groups according to the timing of receiving treatment: 1) the early period group: patients admitted before January 2021 received the hybrid strategy of traditional and novel surgical strategies; and 2) the late period group: patients admitted during and after January 2021 received the complete novel surgical strategy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

271

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • None Selected
      • Tianjin, None Selected, China
        • Tianjin Nankai Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

We conducted a retrospective, before-after, single-center study from January 2019 to September 2022 at the Department of Surgery, Tianjin Nankai Hospital. Consecutive patients older than 18 years with necrotizing pancreatitis were included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Consecutive patients older than 18 years with necrotizing pancreatitis were included.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who met one or more of the following criteria were excluded: (1) had a past medical history of acute pancreatitis; (2) had drainage or surgery for pancreatic necrosis in other hospitals before admission to our institute; and (3) did not complete the treatment strategy owing to nonmedical reasons.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
the early period group
Patients admitted before January 2021 received the hybrid strategy of traditional and novel surgical strategies.

Immediate drainagewas advocated within 24 hours once necrosis was diagnosed. During the treatment course, a hybrid approach was available by flexibly switching interventions. Open surgery was only applied when patients required emergency surgery.

The minimally invasive surgery was selected based on the size, location, and maturity of the necrotic area and stepwise response to intervention. Repeated peritoneal purification was performed until the infected or devitalized tissue was controlled. Patients were subsequently discharged with a drainage catheter and readmitted at 7- to 10-day intervals to receive repeated planned surgery without postoperative irrigation. Patients received a whole-course assessment for individual patients at 7-day predetermined intervals.

Interventions were postponed until 4 weeks after the onset of pancreatitis in line with international guidelines unless the patient showed evidence of progressive clinical deterioration despite the use of maximal supportive care. Patients underwent CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage as the first step. Treatment response was evaluated after 3 days. If drainage was clinically unsuccessful, a VARD procedure was performed. Similarly, open surgery, which was described by Beger et al., was performed if the VARD procedure failed. Postoperative continuous lavage is performed as a routine procedure.
the late period group
Patients admitted during and after January 2021 received the complete novel PMMI surgical strategy.

Immediate drainagewas advocated within 24 hours once necrosis was diagnosed. During the treatment course, a hybrid approach was available by flexibly switching interventions. Open surgery was only applied when patients required emergency surgery.

The minimally invasive surgery was selected based on the size, location, and maturity of the necrotic area and stepwise response to intervention. Repeated peritoneal purification was performed until the infected or devitalized tissue was controlled. Patients were subsequently discharged with a drainage catheter and readmitted at 7- to 10-day intervals to receive repeated planned surgery without postoperative irrigation. Patients received a whole-course assessment for individual patients at 7-day predetermined intervals.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
major complications
Time Frame: 90-day follow up
90-day follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mortality
Time Frame: 90-day follow up
90-day follow up
Admission of ICU
Time Frame: up to 90-days
up to 90-days
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: up to 90-days
up to 90-days
individual major complications
Time Frame: 90-day follow up
The overall complications included procedure-related complications (intra-abdominal and gastrointestinal bleeding, pancreatic fistulas, and gastrointestinal perforation) and nonspecific complications (systemic inflammatory response syndrome, abdominal compartment syndrome, and new-onset renal, respiratory and circulatory failure).
90-day follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TianjinNH

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Pancreatitis

Clinical Trials on The novel PMMI surgical strategy

3
Subscribe