Phase I Trial of CArbonic Anhydrase Inhibition in Combination With Radiochemotherapy or Radioimmunotherapy in Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (ICAR)

January 16, 2026 updated by: Centre Antoine Lacassagne

The investigators propose to study the carbonic anhydrase inhibition (acetazolamide) associated with concomitant radiochemotherapy or radioimmunotherapy in small cell lung cancer due to:

  1. The over-expression of carbonic anhydrases in this type of cancer,
  2. The Anti-tumor effect in preclinical acetazolamide in various tumor lines including neuroendocrine tumor lines,
  3. The observed synergy between irradiation and inhibition of carbonic anhydrases,
  4. Potential anti-tumor immune effect caused by decreased extracellular acidity.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Compared with healthy cells, glucose metabolism is greatly modified in cancer cells because of their highly proliferative character. This differential tumor / healthy tissue property is an opportunity to be able to propose a treatment whose therapeutic gain can be major (targeted treatment). Preclinical studies are multiple and showed that the targeting of overexpressed proteins (carbonic anhydrases) and involved in glycolytic metabolism can lead to a significant anti-tumor effect. This has never been tested in humans.

Acetazolamide is a molecule commonly used for non carcinologic purposes but has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in preclinical studies; there is also synergy radiotherapy / targeting of carbonic anhydrases. Therefore, the investigators propose to study the combination of acetazolamide / radiotherapy / chemotherapy with platinum and etoposide in localized Small Cell Lung cancer, or associated with radioimmunotherapy (extensive SCLC).

This would be the first study:

  • targeting glucose metabolism,
  • testing the effectiveness of acetazolamide in oncology,
  • testing the synergy radiotherapy / targeting glycolytic metabolism,
  • trying to manipulate the anti-tumor immune system indirectly, by decreasing extracellular acidosis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
27

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Nice, France, 06189
  • Monaco
      • Monte Carlo, Monaco
        • Terminated
        • Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > or = 18 years,
  • Performance Status 0 to 2,
  • Patient with an histologically non-metastatic localized (or extensive SCLC sub-group) Small cell lung cancer,
  • Patient who must start radiotherapy treatment combined with chemotherapy with platinum and etoposide (localized SCLC sub-group) or Patient who received 4 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy with platinum salts, etoposide and immunotherapy (atezolizumab or durvalumab) as the first treatment (extensive SCLC sub-group) Note: The decision of the Multidisciplinary Consultation Team must be notified in the patient's medical file,
  • Evaluation lesion according to the criteria RECIST 1.1 and / or according to the criteria PERCIST 1.0,
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 72 hours of the first administration of the study treatment,
  • If the patient is a woman of childbearing potential, she must be surgically sterile or agree to use two adequate methods of contraception throughout the duration of the study until 1 month after the last administration of the study treatment. Subjects of childbearing potential are those who have not been surgically sterilized or have not been free from menses for > 1 year, Note: Abstinence is acceptable if it is the patient's usual and preferred form of contraception,
  • If the male patient has one or more female partners of childbearing age, he / she must agree to use an adequate method of contraception, starting at the first administration of the study treatment up to 1 month after the last administration of the treatment. of the study, Note: Abstinence is acceptable if it is the patient's usual and preferred form of contraception,
  • Patient willing and able to provide written informed consent/assent for the trial,
  • Patient affiliated with a health insurance system.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with metastatic disease,
  • History of thoracic irradiation or near / in the thoracic irradiation field,
  • Patient who refuses to participate in the study or unable to agree,

  • Contraindication to thoracic radiotherapy treatment: congestive heart failure unbalanced (ejection fraction <30%, clinical signs), severe respiratory failure:

    • COPD grade IV according to the GOLD classification,
    • Some GOLD III COPD and any patient with a respiratory defect defined as: oxygen dependence and / or FEV1 <40% normal and / or, DLCO <40% predictive value and / or vital capacity <40% predictive value,
  • Contraindication to acetazolamide: hypersensitivity to acetazolamide, severe hepatic, renal or adrenal insufficiency, sulfonamide intolerance, history of renal colic, allergy to wheat other than celiac disease,
  • Patient currently receiving one or more treatments described in section 6.9 of the protocol,
  • History of cancer, with the exception of cancers in complete remission for more than 5 years, completely resected basal cell carcinoma of the skin or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has undergone potentially curative therapy or in situ cervical cancer,
  • People particularly vulnerable as defined in Articles L.1121-5 to -8 of the French Healthcare Code, including: person deprived of freedom by an administrative or judicial decision, adult being the object of a legal protection measure or outside a state to express their consent, pregnant or breastfeeding women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Localized SCLC
non randomized, open-label extension cohort, evaluating the safety of acetazolamide in combination with platinum and etoposide-based radiochemotherapy in patients with Localized small lung cancer
Drug: acetazolamide in combination with platinum and etoposide-based radiochemotherapy
Radiation therapy will be combined with platinum and etoposide-based chemotherapy combined with 3-6 tablets per day of acetazolamide during the entire course of therapy (dosage appropriate to the inclusion phase).
Other: Extensive SCLC
non randomized, open-label extension cohort, evaluating the safety of acetazolamide in combination with radioimmunotherapy in patients with extensive small cell lung cancer
Drug: acetazolamide in combination with radioimmunotherapy in patients with extensive SCLC
acetazolamide in combination with radioimmunotherapy in patients with extensive SCLC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To identify the Tolerated Maximum Dose (DMT) and Recommended Dose (DR) of acetazolamide in combination with radiotherapy combined with platinum and etoposide chemotherapy (localized SCLC) or with radioimmunotherapy (extensive SCLC)
Time Frame: 8 months

The frequency of limiting dose toxicities determined by the number of Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.03 :

  • during the 6 weeks of treatment with acetazolamide / chemoradiation based on platinum and etoposide and in the first 6 months of follow-up after the last administration of the treatment
  • during the 10 days of treatment with acetazolamide / radioimmunotherapy and in the first 6 months after the last administration of the treatment with radioimmunotherapy, for the "extensive SCLC" subgroup
8 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment
Time Frame: 24 months
The tumor response (complete or partial, stabilization, progression) will be performed by Morphological evaluations using a scanner according to RECIST 1.1 criteria
24 months
To evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment
Time Frame: 24 months
The tumor response (complete or partial, stabilization, progression) will be performed by Metabolic evaluations using a PET-CT scan according to the criteria PERCIST 1.0
24 months
To identify predictive factors for response to acetazolamide
Time Frame: 30 months

The evaluation of predictive factors of acetazolamide response will be determined by:

o The initial 18-FDG PET-CT scan (SUVmax, SULpeak) fixation intensity and 3 months after treatment,
30 months
To evaluate progression-free survival at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
To determine the delay between the date of inclusion and the date of progression or death
24 months
To evaluate overall survival at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
To determine the delay between the date of inclusion and the date of death
24 months
To determine the compliance of acetazolamide
Time Frame: 27 months
Compliance assessment will be done using Girerd's questionnaire
27 months
To evaluate the quality of life
Time Frame: 27 months
Quality of life will be determined using EORTC QLQC30 questionnaire
27 months
To determine the overall tolerance of the association acetazolamide and radiochemotherapy (localized SCLC) or of the association acetazolamide and radioimmunotherapy (extensive)SCLC)
Time Frame: 27 months
The overall tolerability of the treatments will be measured by clinical (performance status), laboratory (blood sample), and paraclinical evaluations (ETT, EFR) and defined on the NCI CTCAE V4.03 scale
27 months
To identify predictive factors for response to acetazolamide
Time Frame: 3 months
The evaluation of predictive factors of acetazolamide response will be determined by serum CAIX and CAXII levels (in the 7 days before the start of acetazolamide and the end-of-treatment visit)
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Antoine Lacassagne

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Vanessa VIDAL, Centre Antoine Lacassagne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 2, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 27, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 27, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 16, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2017/14
  • 2022-503093-36-00 (Ctis)
  • 2017-002160-40 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on acetazolamide in combination with platinum and etoposide-based radiochemotherapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings