Comparison of Intra-articular Dexmedetomidine and Magnesium in Postoperative Pain

November 8, 2018 updated by: Hande G. Aytuluk, Derince Training and Research Hospital
Arthroscopic meniscus surgeries are the most frequent orthopedic procedures. The objective of the study is to compare the effects of intraarticular local anesthetic and adjuvant (dexmedetomidine vs magnesium) combinations in postoperative pain and analgesic requirement. The investigators' hypothesis is adjuvants added to the local anesthetics decreases the total local anesthetic dose, provides more effective pain relief according to local anesthetic only, and decreases the postoperative systemic non-steroidal analgesic and opioid doses.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Arthroscopic meniscus surgeries are the most frequent orthopedic procedures. However, irritation of free nerve endings in the synovial tissue and anterior fat pads and stretching and resection in the joint capsule lead to pain at various levels. Proper pain management enhances recovery, provides early mobilization and shortens length of hospital stay.

"Opioid-free" analgesia methods are frequently emphasized in published postoperative pain management guidelines and multimodal treatment approaches such as local anesthetic infiltration is recommended. In the treatment of knee pain, intra-articular drug injections are the most commonly used method because of minimal systemic side effects.

The drugs most commonly administered intraarticularly included local anesthetics (bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, lidocaine), opioids (morphine, fentanyl), magnesium sulfate, steroids, and α2 agonists (clonidine, dexmedetomidine).

Dexmedetomidine is a selective, specific, lipophilic and potent α2 adrenergic receptor agonist with sedative, anxiolytic, analgesic, antihypertensive and sympatholytic effects. It provides analgesic activity through both the central and peripheral nervous system. The analgesic effects of intra-articular administration of dexmedetomidine in arthroscopic surgeries have been demonstrated. Most side effects of this drug included hypotension and bradycardia. However, these side effects have never been encountered with intra-articular injection of the drug.

Magnesium is also an adjuvant drug which has a key role in nociceptive transmission, and acts as a NMDA (N-Methyl-D-Aspartate) antagonist in spinal neurons.

While opioid free anesthesia and analgesia methods gain importance nowadays, there has been increased interest in non-opioid analgesic drugs and multimodal analgesia applications. In order to increase the effects of local anesthetics and prolong their analgesic times, the addition of various adjuvants to local anesthetics is frequently used.

In the randomized controlled trials, intraarticular local anesthetic drugs combined with adjuvant drugs for postoperative analgesia were found to be superior to local anesthetic drugs alone. It is also known that local anesthetics have negative effects on chondrocytes. One of the goals of the investigators' in this study is to reduce the amount of local anesthetic used by adding adjuvant to local anesthetics.

In this study, the investigators plan to compare the efficacy of 2 adjuvants (magnesium sulfate and dexmedetomidine) combined with local anesthetics to be given intraarticularly for postoperative pain management after elective arthroscopic surgery.

Intraarticular high-volume drug injections may cause pain due to tension in the joint capsule. Additionally, the investigators aim to decrease the total drug volume with adjuvant drugs used in combination with local anesthetic, and thus to prevent joint capsule tension pain.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
62

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • Derince
      • Kocaeli, Derince, Turkey, 41900
        • Derince Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age >18, <65
  • scheduled for elective knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia
  • ASA I and ASA II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age <18 and >65
  • patients who received general anesthesia
  • diabetes
  • refusal of the patient
  • known allergy to the specified drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Precedex
5ml 0.25% Bupivacaine ve 50mcg Dexmetedomidin (diluted to 5ml with normal saline) intraarticularly at the end of surgery (total volume: 10 ml)
Drug: Precedex
10 ml of Bupivacaine ve 50mcg Dexmetedomidin mixture will be injected intraarticularly at the end of the surgery.
Other Names:
  • bupivacaine
EXPERIMENTAL: Magnesium Sulfate
5ml 0.25% Bupivacaine ve 5ml Magnesium Sulfate intraarticularly at the end of surgery (total volume: 10 ml)
Drug: Magnesium Sulfate
10 ml of Bupivacaine ve magnesium sulfate mixture will be injected intraarticularly at the end of the surgery.
Other Names:
  • bupivacaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: 24 hours
postoperative pain scores (rest and movement) (ward) Pain scores were assessed with a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (with 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst imaginable pain)
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Opioid/NSAID Consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours
nonsteroid antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) or opioid drugs that are applied to patients will be noted.
24 hours
Rescue Analgesic Time
Time Frame: 24 hours
Time to first analgesic demand at the orthopedics ward (from intraarticular injection to first analgesic requirement)
24 hours
Surgery Time
Time Frame: 24 hours
time from skin incision to closure
24 hours
Time to the End of Spinal Anesthesia
Time Frame: 24 hours
time from the start of spinal anesthesia (total block = Bromage 3) to the end of spinal anesthesia (Bromage 0)
24 hours
Mobilization
Time Frame: 24 hours
First mobilization time after surgery
24 hours
Number of Participants With Complications Due to Intraarticular Injection
Time Frame: 24 hours
post-injection complications due to intraarticular injection will be noted.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Derince Training and Research Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Tolga K Saracoglu, Ass Prof, Derince Training and Research Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 26, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 26, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 8, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • U1111-1211-1791

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

not decided yet

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Precedex

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings