Assessing Lung Inhomogeneity During Ventilation for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (ALIVE)

November 20, 2023 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto
Mechanical ventilation can cause damage by overstretching the lungs, especially when the lungs are collapsed or edematous. Raising ventilator pressures can reduce lung collapse and this can prevent overstretching from mechanical ventilation. It remains uncertain how much pressure (PEEP - positive end-expiratory pressure) should be used on the ventilator and how to identify patients who will benefit from higher ventilator pressures vs. lower ventilator pressures. The investigators are using a unique new imaging technology, electrical impedance tomography (EIT), to study this problem and to determine the safest and most effective ventilator pressure level. The results of this study will inform future trials of higher vs. lower PEEP strategies in mechanically ventilated patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients participating in this physiological cross-over randomized trial will undergo a series of PEEP maneuvers designed to assess lung recruitability, PEEP responsiveness, and optimal PEEP. EIT imaging and esophageal manometry will be employed throughout the protocol to quantify the effect of PEEP on lung function. Patients will be randomized to be ventilated at PEEP levels supplied by the ExPRESS strategy or by the EIT hyperdistention/collapse algorithm. The biological response will be assessed by measuring serum cytokines.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2N2
        • University Health Network

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute (≤7 days) hypoxemia with PaO2:FiO2 ratio less than or equal to 200 mm Hg
  • Oral endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation
  • Bilateral airspace opacities on chest radiograph or CT

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to EIT electrode placement (burns, chest wall bandaging limiting electrode placement)
  • Contraindication to esophageal catheter placement (recent upper GI surgery, actively bleeding esophageal varices)
  • Respiratory failure predominantly due to cardiogenic cause or fluid overload
  • Ongoing hemodynamic instability (requiring 2 vasopressor agents by continuous infusion AND rising vasopressor infusion rate requirements in the previous 8 hours)
  • Ongoing ventilatory instability (P/F < 70 mm Hg, pH < 7.2; ventilator driving pressures, PEEP, or FiO2 increasing by more than 25% in previous 30 minutes)
  • Intracranial hypertension (suspected or diagnosed by medical team)
  • Known or suspected pneumothorax recognized within previous 72 hours
  • Bronchopleural fistula
  • Bridge to lung transplant
  • Recent lung transplantation (within previous 6 weeks)
  • Attending physician deems the transient application of high airway pressures (>40 cm H2O) to be unsafe

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: EIT algorithm
Patients randomized to this arm will be ventilated at the PEEP level selected by the EIT algorithm, which selects a PEEP at which both collapse and hyperdistention are minimized.
Device: Electrical Impedance Tomography
Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a new technique that enables real-time visualization of the distribution of ventilation at the bedside. This technique allows clinicians and investigators to immediately determine how applying higher or lower PEEP levels affect stress and strain in the lung. The investigators propose to apply this new technique to test a strategy for finding the optimal level of PEEP that prevents lung injury and improves outcomes in critically ill patients.
Active Comparator: ExPRESS algorithm
Patients randomized to this arm will be ventilated at the PEEP level selected by the ExPRESS algorithm, which is a method that targets a tidal volume of 6 ml/kg predicted body weight and then titrates PEEP until plateau airway pressure reaches 28 cm H2O.
Other: ExPRESS-derived PEEP level
The ExPRESS algorithm is a traditional approach to selecting PEEP based on respiratory mechanics.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intratidal ventilation heterogeneity
Time Frame: Assessed after completion of 3 hours on randomized strategy (EIT vs ExPRESS)
A measure of variation in the distribution of ventilation throughout the lung as detected by electrical impedance tomography
Assessed after completion of 3 hours on randomized strategy (EIT vs ExPRESS)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in the optimal PEEP levels identified by several different PEEP titration strategies
Time Frame: Assessed immediately after completion of decremental PEEP titration procedure
Compare the relative degree of agreement or disparity between PEEP levels recommended by different PEEP titration strategies
Assessed immediately after completion of decremental PEEP titration procedure
Change in ratio of partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) to inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2) ratio following a standardized increased in PEEP
Time Frame: Assessed 10 minutes after step PEEP increase from 6-8 to 16-18 cm H2O
Measurement of changes in oxygenation by PaO2/FiO2 ratio due to PEEP
Assessed 10 minutes after step PEEP increase from 6-8 to 16-18 cm H2O
Respiratory mechanics (transpulmonary driving pressure)
Time Frame: Assessed after completing 3 hours on the randomized PEEP strategy (EIT vs ExPRESS)
The swing in transpulmonary pressure during inspiration, a measure of dynamic lung stress
Assessed after completing 3 hours on the randomized PEEP strategy (EIT vs ExPRESS)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Health Network, Toronto

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ewan Goligher, MD, PhD, University Health Network, Toronto

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 18, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 20, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 18-6091
  • 17-6226 (Other Identifier: UHN CAPCR Related ID)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings