EffectiveNess of Low-dose Aspirin in Prevention of Cancer in the Stomach and Oesophagus (GastrointEstinal Cancer Prevention) - United Kingdom ("ENgAGE - UK"): Study to Evaluate the Risk of Cancer in the Stomach and Oesophagus Among New Users of Low-dose Aspirin Using the THIN Database in the UK (ENgAGE-UK)

May 29, 2020 updated by: Bayer

Effectiveness of Low-dose Aspirin in Gastrointestinal Cancer Prevention -United Kingdom ("ENgAGE - UK"): A Cohort Study on the Risk of Gastric and Oesophageal Cancer Among New Users of Low-dose Aspirin Using the THIN Database in the UK

Researchers already did studies in low-dose Aspirin for the prevention of heart and blood vessels disease and for the prevention of cancer of the colorectum. In this study, they want to learn whether an effect for the prevention of oesophagus cancer and stomach cancer goes along with the use of low-dose ASA on patients taking this medicine for the prevention of heart and blood vessels disease compared to non-use. To find this out electronic medical records stored in primary care database in the UK, The Health Improvement Network (THIN), will be used.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
99999

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 89 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The source population will be constituted (inclusion criteria) by individuals who are aged 40-89 years in the THIN database in the UK, who are enrolled with the primary care doctor (PCP) for at least 2 years, or have a history of computerized prescriptions for at least 1 year prior to start date and who are free of low-dose ASA and cancer to become a member of the source population.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 40-89 years
  • Enrolled with the PCP for at least 2 years
  • To have a history of computerized prescriptions in THIN for at least 1 year prior to start date

Exclusion Criteria:

  • To be exposed to low-dose ASA before entering in the study
  • Having a diagnosis of any cancer before entering in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Low-dose ASA cohort
A person is identified as newly exposed to low-dose ASA, he/she will become member of new user low-dose ASA cohort and that date will be the start date for outcome follow-up.
Drug: Acetylsalicylic Acid(BAYE4465, Aspirin )
Administration according to clinical practice
Comparison unexposed cohort
When a member of new user low-dose ASA cohort is confirmed, one comparison member will be confirmed also from the source population not yet censored on that day (start date) and with the same distribution of matching factors (age, sex, time interval since entry date and number of PCP visits in the year prior to start date) of its low-dose ASA pair with the only difference of being free of ASA on start date.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence rates of oesophageal cancer and stomach cancer with use of low-dose ASA overall compared to non-use
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis between 1-Jan-2005 and 31-Dec-2017
Diagnosis of cancer is routinely recorded by means of Read codes in THIN database
Retrospective analysis between 1-Jan-2005 and 31-Dec-2017
Incidence rates of oesophageal cancer and stomach cancer with use of low-dose ASA by age compared to non-use
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis between 1-Jan-2005 and 31-Dec-2017
Age: 40-64 years, 65-74 years and 75 and more years.
Retrospective analysis between 1-Jan-2005 and 31-Dec-2017
Incidence rates of oesophageal cancer and stomach cancer with use of low-dose ASA by sex-specific compared to non-use
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis between 1-Jan-2005 and 31-Dec-2017
Sex: Male, Female
Retrospective analysis between 1-Jan-2005 and 31-Dec-2017

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of oesophageal cancer and stomach cancer among new users of low-dose ASA
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis between 1-Jan-2005 and 31-Dec-2017
Retrospective analysis between 1-Jan-2005 and 31-Dec-2017
Duration of low-dose ASA
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis between 1-Jan-2005 and 31-Dec-2017
Duration of treatment will be calculated among current users.
Retrospective analysis between 1-Jan-2005 and 31-Dec-2017
Dose-response of low-dose ASA
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis between 1-Jan-2005 and 31-Dec-2017
The following daily doses will be ascertained: 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg.
Retrospective analysis between 1-Jan-2005 and 31-Dec-2017
Number of case-fatality of oesophageal cancer and stomach cancer among new users of low-dose ASA
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis between 1-Jan-2005 and 31-Dec-2017
Retrospective analysis between 1-Jan-2005 and 31-Dec-2017
Incidence of oesophageal cancer and stomach cancer among new users of low-dose ASA for primary or secondary cardiovascular prevention
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis between 1-Jan-2005 and 31-Dec-2017
The primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention population of low-dose ASA users will be defined using a computer algorithm ascertaining any recorded Read code suggestive of cardiovascular disease (CVD).
Retrospective analysis between 1-Jan-2005 and 31-Dec-2017

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bayer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 30, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 15, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 14, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 29, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20326

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Availability of this study's data will be determined according to Bayer's commitment to the EFPIA/PhRMA "Principles for responsible clinical trial data sharing". This pertains to scope, timepoint and process of data access. As such, Bayer commits to sharing upon request from qualified researchers patient-level clinical trial data, study-level clinical trial data, and protocols from clinical trials in patients for medicines and indications approved in the US and EU as necessary for conducting legitimate research. This applies to data on new medicines and indications that have been approved by the EU and US regulatory agencies on or after January 01, 2014. Interested researchers can use www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com to request access to anonymized patient-level data and supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct research. Information on the Bayer criteria for listing studies and other relevant information is provided in the Study sponsors section of the portal.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings