The Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Endoscopy Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With or Without Polyp

July 13, 2020 updated by: Simon-Pierre Harvey-Bolduc, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

The Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Endoscopy Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With or Without Polyp: A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial

This is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the prophylactic use of antibiotics in postoperative endoscopic sinus vs placebo surgery. Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with or without polyps who have consented to endoscopic sinus surgery according to Canadian practice guidelines may be included in the study after approval by the Research Ethics Board of the University Hospital Center. Quebec and signature of consent.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The severity of the disease will be evaluated preoperatively according to the SNOT-22 score, the visual analogue scale of nasal symptoms, the Lund-Mackay score on the CT-scan and the Modified Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score (sinusoscopy will be recorded). Relevant demographics and medical history of participants will also be collected preoperatively.

The extension of the CES and intraoperative findings will be noted. Patients who have an infection during the procedure (pus with positive culture) will be excluded from the study. During the surgery, 4 groups will be formed as described in the figure below. Patients will be divided according to the presence or absence of polyps at the endoscopy and randomized in one of the 2 groups by the pharmacy of the CHU of Quebec. This will provide either a prescription of Clavulin 875 mg per os twice daily for 10 days, or a placebo of similar visual appearance in the same dosage. A bioabsorbable dressing (NasoPore, Stryker) will be positioned at the mid-meatus level at the end of the procedure. Nasal irrigations of saline solution will be prescribed post-operatively (qid for 1 month) as well as intra-nasal corticosteroids bid after 1 week (usual treatment). The addition of systemic corticosteroids will be left to the judgment of the surgeon, noted and analyzed as a confounding factor.

Follow-up will be done at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-surgery. Patients will have to complete the SNOT-22 quality of life score and the visual similar scale of nasal symptoms at each visit. Sinusoscopy will be recorded at scheduled visits postoperatively. A single blind evaluator (to limit inter-rater differences) will analyze the video recordings to establish the modified Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score for each patient. Middle-meat secretion culture will be performed if pus is present during sinusoscopy and an antibiotic prescribed if needed. The patient will have to fill in a diary of other medications (analgesics, narcotics, anti-inflammatories) as well as a diary of side effects that will be collected at the visit of a post-operative month.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
134

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years old and over able to consent
  • Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and failure to maximal medical treatment
  • Endoscopic sinus surgery with at least one of the following: maxillary antrostomy, ethmoidectomy, sphenoidotomy and / or frontal sinusotomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Antibiotherapy less than 2 weeks before the intervention
  • Penicillin allergy
  • Inability to establish follow-up
  • Open sinus surgery or associated septorhinoplasty (simple septoplasty is not considered an exclusion criterion)
  • Immunodeficiency
  • Cystic fibrosis of the pancreas
  • Pregnancy
  • odontogenic sinusitis
  • Fungal sinusitis
  • Diabetic
  • Ciliary dyskinesia
  • Sinus neoplasia
  • Patient requiring antibiotic prophylaxis for endocarditis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Clavulin group with polyps
Group who will receive clavulin after the endoscopic sinus surgery in prophylactic and who have polyps in the surgery
Drug: Amoxicillin / Clavulanic acid 875mg / 125mg
Amoxicillin / Clavulanic acid 875 mg / 125 mg BID x 10 days
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group with polyps
Group who will receive placebo after the endoscopic sinus surgery in prophylactic and who have polyps in the surgery
Drug: Placebos
Placebos BID x 10 days
Active Comparator: Clavulin group without polyps
Group who will receive clavulin after the endoscopic sinus surgery in prophylactic and who haven't polyps in the surgery
Drug: Amoxicillin / Clavulanic acid 875mg / 125mg
Amoxicillin / Clavulanic acid 875 mg / 125 mg BID x 10 days
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group without polyps
Group who will receive clavulin after the endoscopic sinus surgery in prophylactic and who haven't polyps in the surgery
Drug: Placebos
Placebos BID x 10 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score
Time Frame: 3 months
The modified Lund-Kennedy score is an endoscopic score that measures sinus involvement during endoscopy. It is divided into 2 nostrils. For each nostril, it has a score of 0 to 2 for the presence of polyp, edema and flow. The score is therefore 0 to 6 for each nostril for a maximum of 12. The higher the score, the more severe is the condition
3 months
Quality of life of patients SNOT-22
Time Frame: 3 months
The SNOT-22 score is a quality of life score. It contains 22 sinus symptoms. Each of the symptoms is scored from 0 to 5, with 0 being no problem and 5 being a severe problem. The SNOT-22 is a score of 0 to 110, the higher the score, the more severe the disease.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score
Time Frame: 1 months
The modified Lund-Kennedy score is an endoscopic score that measures sinus involvement during endoscopy. It is divided into 2 nostrils. For each nostril, it has a score of 0 to 2 for the presence of polyp, edema and flow. The score is therefore 0 to 6 for each nostril for a maximum of 12. The higher the score, the more severe is the condition
1 months
Rate of infection
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluate the rate of infection after endoscopic sinus surgery with or without prophylactic antibiotics, defined according to the criteria of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis.
3 months
VAS symptoms
Time Frame: 3 months
The visual analogue scale is a scale containing 6 rhinological symptoms. On a 10 centimeter scale, the patient will write the important of his symptoms, 10 being the maximum and 0 the minimum.
3 months
Side effects
Time Frame: 3 months
Compare side effects when using prophylactic antibiotics after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis versus placebo.
3 months
Modified Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score
Time Frame: 6 months
The modified Lund-Kennedy score is an endoscopic score that measures sinus involvement during endoscopy. It is divided into 2 nostrils. For each nostril, it has a score of 0 to 2 for the presence of polyp, edema and flow. The score is therefore 0 to 6 for each nostril for a maximum of 12. The higher the score, the more severe is the condition
6 months
Quality of life of patients SNOT-22
Time Frame: 1 months
The SNOT-22 score is a quality of life score. It contains 22 sinus symptoms. Each of the symptoms is scored from 0 to 5, with 0 being no problem and 5 being a severe problem. The SNOT-22 is a score of 0 to 110, the higher the score, the more severe the disease.
1 months
Quality of life of patients SNOT-22
Time Frame: 6 months
The SNOT-22 score is a quality of life score. It contains 22 sinus symptoms. Each of the symptoms is scored from 0 to 5, with 0 being no problem and 5 being a severe problem. The SNOT-22 is a score of 0 to 110, the higher the score, the more severe the disease.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 14, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 13, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ATBprophylacticCES

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Sinus Infection

Clinical Trials on Amoxicillin / Clavulanic acid 875mg / 125mg

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings