Intervention of Intestinal Microorganism in Mild Cognitive Impairment

July 12, 2022 updated by: XuanwuH 2

Regulatory Mechanism of Intestinal Microorganism in Intervening Mild Cognitive Impairment Based on Multi-modal Neuroimaging Techniques

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of neurodegenerative disorders leading to dementia. Currently, there has been no effective drugs targeting this disease. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota is considered to be associated with AD, and probiotic supplementation may positively affect cognitive function. However, there are few studies involving the relationship between intestinal microorganism and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). In this project, taking the method of random, double blindness and control, the probiotic supplemented group with aMCI will take certain Bifidobacterium for a certain time. After that, the investigators aim to investigate the improvement of cognitive function and changes of intestinal microbial flora diversity via combining neuropsychological tests and 16S recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (rDNA) high-throughput sequencing technique. Furthermore, based on the multi-modal neuroimaging techniques, the regulatory mechanism of intestinal microorganism in intervening aMCI will be revealed from the perspective of brain networks. In conclusion, these results are beneficial for understanding the therapeutic effect of gut microbiota as a non-drug treatment for early AD and further elucidating the potential brain mechanism, which are of great values in solving scientific and clinical practice issues.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota is considered to be associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD), and probiotic supplementation may positively affect cognitive function for patients with AD. However, there are few existing studies involving the role of gut microbiota in possible intervention for amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI).

In this project, taking the method of random, double blindness and control, the probiotic supplemented group with aMCI will take Bifidobacterium for three months. The control group with aMCI will take placebo. After that, the investigators aim to investigate the differences of cognitive function between these two groups and changes of intestinal microbial flora diversity via combining neuropsychological tests and 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing technique. Furthermore, based on the multi-modal neuroimaging techniques, including structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI）, functional MRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)， functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), the regulatory mechanism of intestinal microorganism in intervening aMCI will be revealed from the perspective of brain networks.

In conclusion, these results are beneficial for understanding the therapeutic effect of gut microbiome as a non-drug treatment for early AD and further elucidating the potential brain mechanism, which are of great values in solving scientific and clinical practice issues.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100053
        • Department of Neurolgy, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of patients with aMCI: memory loss complaint confirmed by an informant; objective cognitive impairment in single or multiple domains, adjusted for age and education; preserved general cognitive function; failure to meet the criteria for dementia; the clinical dementia rating (CDR) score is 0.5.
  • Clinical diagnosis of patients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD): presence of self-perceived continuous cognitive decline compared to previous normal status and unrelated to an acute event; failure to meet the following criteria for MCI.
  • Clinical diagnosis of the control group: no complaint of memory loss; CDR score is 0; no severe visual or auditory impairment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a history of stroke;
  • major depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score > 24 points);
  • other central nervous system diseases that may cause cognitive impairment, such as Parkinson's disease, tumors, encephalitis and epilepsy;
  • cognitive impairment caused by traumatic brain injury;
  • systemic diseases, such as thyroid dysfunction, syphilis and HIV;
  • a history of psychosis or congenital mental growth retardation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Probiotic supplemented group with aMCI
Thirty participants in this group will take Bifidobacterium for three months.
Dietary supplement: Probiotic supplemented intervention
In this project, taking the method of random, double blindness and control, the probiotic supplemented group with aMCI will take Bifidobacterium for three months. After that, cognitive changes will be test to investigate the effectiveness of probiotic supplementation.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo group with aMCI
Thirty participants in this group will take placebo for three months.
Dietary supplement: Placebo
In this project, taking the method of random, double blindness and control, the placebo group with aMCI will take placebo for three months. After that, cognitive changes will be test.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Three months
After intervention for three months, the investigators first aim to compare cognitive changes of Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) among three groups, in order to investigate the therapeutic effectiveness of probiotic supplementation and functional foods.
Three months
Improvement of Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT)
Time Frame: Three months
After intervention for three months, the investigators will then compare cognitive changes of Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) among three groups, in order to investigate the therapeutic effectiveness of probiotic supplementation and functional foods.
Three months
Changes of intestinal microbial flora diversity
Time Frame: Three months
After intervention for three months, the investigators will further compare the diversity changes of intestinal microbial flora, such as Lactobacteria species, Bifidobacterium, Enterococci, Propionobacteria, Peptostreptococci, etc., among three groups.
Three months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Structural MRI-based brain network changes
Time Frame: Three months
After intervention for three months, the investigators will compare the structural changes of brain network among three groups (e.g., efficiency, clustering, modularity) in order to reveal the regulatory mechanism of intestinal microorganism in intervening aMCI.
Three months
Functional MRI-based brain network changes
Time Frame: Three months
After intervention for three months, the investigators will compare the functional changes of brain network among three groups (e.g., functional connectivity, hub) in order to reveal the regulatory mechanism of intestinal microorganism in intervening aMCI.
Three months
FNIRS-based brain network changes
Time Frame: Three months
After intervention for three months, the investigators will compare the functional changes of brain network among three groups (e.g., functional connectivity, small word, efficiency) in order to reveal the regulatory mechanism of intestinal microorganism in intervening aMCI.
Three months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
XuanwuH 2

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Beijing Normal University
First Hospital of Tsinghua University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 31, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 16, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 12, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HanYingsc

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The information of neuropsychological tests, neuroimaging data are to be shared with other researchers.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

When summary data are published or starting 6 months after publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The information of neuropsychological tests, neuroimaging data will be shared.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on Probiotic supplemented intervention

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings