A Multicenter, Safety and Efficacy Study of Taliglucerase Alfa in Subjects With Type 3 Gaucher Disease

November 24, 2024 updated by: Ari Zimran
This is a multicenter study to assess the safety and efficacy of taliglucerase alfa (60 units/kg) in previously untreated subjects of any age with Type 3 GD. Subjects will receive an infusion of taliglucerase alfa every 2 weeks for 12 months. Subjects who tolerate the infusions well, and who are treated in centers where home therapy is the SOC will be allowed to switch from site to home treatment at the discretion of the PI but after no less than 3 uneventful infusions at the site.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with Type 3 GD exhibit both visceral and neurologic manifestations. In addition to the progressive neurologic involvement, somatic disease manifestations, especially splenomegaly and resulting cytopenia, contribute to significant mortality and morbidity . The effects of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) on patients with Type 1 GD have been clearly documented and have a beneficial effect on visceral and hematologic disease parameters . It is known that recombinant enzyme does not pass the blood-brain barrier and has no effect on neurologic involvement . Probably due to the rarity of Type 3 GD, information on the somatic effects of ERT is largely limited to case reports or single-center series. There are also few reviews of cohorts but the clinical subtype, age, genotype, ERT dosage, accompanying therapies, and treatment response vary widely among patients in these cohorts. This prospective study aims to objectively evaluate the hematologic and visceral effects of ERT with taliglucerase alfa on a rather clinically and genetically homogenous group of treatment-naïve patients with Type 3 GD . For the purposes of this study, subjects receiving no Gaucher-specific medications for at least 12 months will be considered "untreated". The results of this study are expected to provide a more objective view of the degree of response of this patient type, and potentially create new areas of research.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
14

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • India
      • New Delhi, India
        • All India Institute of Medical Sciences
  • Israel
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 9103102
        • Shaare Zedek Medical Center
  • Turkey
      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Gazi University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female of any age; however, if female:

    • must be using contraception if of childbearing potential or must be surgically sterile
    • must not be lactating
  2. Diagnosis of Type 3 GD by enzyme and sequence analysis; and confirmed by the Medical Monitor.
  3. Splenomegaly at least 5 x multiples of normal (MN).
  4. Treatment-naïve.

Exclusion Criteria:

Eligible subjects may not have any of the following exclusion criteria:

  1. Type 2 GD.
  2. Presence of myoclonic seizures.

  3. At least one allele of:

    • N370S (N409S in recent nomenclature)
    • R496H (R535H in recent nomenclature)
  4. Presence of calcification in heart valves or arteries in echocardiography.
  5. Presence of untreated iron, folic acid, vitamin B12 deficiency and/or hypothyroidism. (Resolved anemia is not an exclusion criterion.)
  6. Presence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and/or hepatitis C infections.
  7. Splenectomy and bone marrow transplantation.
  8. Presence of any medical, emotional, behavioural, or psychological condition that in the judgment of the Investigator would interfere with the subject's compliance with the requirements of the study.
  9. Any other disorder that may interfere with the results of the efficacy endpoints.
  10. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  11. Currently taking another investigational drug for any condition or any therapeutic drug for Gaucher disease.
  12. The subject and/or subject's parent(s) or legal guardian(s) are unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study.
  13. Medical history of any food/drugs allergy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Taliglucerase Alpha
Intravenous infusion of Taligluucerase alfa (Elelyso) in treatment-naive patients with type 3 Gaucher disease
Drug: Elelyso
Taliglucerase alfa is currently an approved therapy in the United States and many other countries for adults and children with a confirmed diagnosis of Type 1 GD ,and is also approved for use in Type 3 GD in a small number of countries.
Other Names:
  • Taliglucerase Alfa

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Spleen Volume Measured by MRI
Time Frame: from baseline to month 12
Percent change from baseline
from baseline to month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Liver Volume Measured by MRI
Time Frame: from baseline to month 12
Percent change from baseline
from baseline to month 12
Percent Change in Hemoglobin
Time Frame: from baseline to Months 3, 6, 9, and 12
Percent change from baseline
from baseline to Months 3, 6, 9, and 12
Percent Change in Platelet Count
Time Frame: from baseline to Months 3, 6, 9, and 12
Percent change from baseline
from baseline to Months 3, 6, 9, and 12
Percent Change in Lyso-GB1
Time Frame: from baseline to Months 3, 6, 9, and 12
Percent change from baseline
from baseline to Months 3, 6, 9, and 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ari Zimran

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Pfizer

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ari Zimran, Prof., Shaare Zedek Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 27, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 24, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • WI224302

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings