Optoacoustic Images Versus Imagio® Ultrasound (Reader-02)

July 9, 2021 updated by: Seno Medical Instruments Inc.

Imagio® Pivotal Multi-Reader, Multi-Case Study of Optoacoustic Images Versus Imagio® Ultrasound to Guide Decision to Biopsy

The Imagio® Pivotal Study is intended to evaluate if the results observed in the previous Feasibility Study can be confirmed for pre-specified effectiveness endpoints. Using Intention-to-Diagnose (ITD) masses from the PIONEER Pivotal study, 480 to 840 masses are to be used for the Pivotal Study, the remaining masses will be reserved for training the SenoGram® model.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This will be a controlled, blinded, multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) study using a sequential design. The study will include 15 readers with an additional 5 as back-up readers depending on qualifications and availability. Readers that participated in the Seno PIONEER Study (NCT01943916) or the Reader-01 Feasibility Study (NCT03708393) are not eligible to participate as readers in this Pivotal Study.

Imagio® [Ultrasound (IUS) + Optoacoustic (OA)] (IUS)(IUS+OA) training will be completed prior to any reads taking place. Read 1 will be immediately followed by Read 2 within the same read session.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
480

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19103
        • American College of Radiology Center for Research and Innovation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • One analyzable mass per patient: BI-RADS 3 and 4a, 4b, 4c and 5 masses as declared by clinical site investigator via PIONEER study inclusion criteria and categorized as BIRADS 3, 4a, 4b 4c and 5 by conventional diagnostic ultrasound (CDU)
  • Masses declared to be in the PIONEER Intention to Diagnose (ITD)/analysis population, including high risk cases per original PIONEER protocol
  • Patient age, indication for study entry and available medical history
  • Evaluable mammograms and OA and IUS video loops and stills for each mass

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Critical missing IUS or OA still image and/or video loop views or incorrect IUS or OA stills and video loops that would preclude a case from being evaluated by readers
  • Reader-02 Proficiency Test and training cases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Imagio IUS
Read 1 (Control): History + Mammogram (if available) + IUS (Imagio Ultrasound) stills and videos provided), IUS Probability of Malignancy (POM) and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) scored and the data form then locked.
Device: Reader Study - Imagio Ultrasound
Imagio ultrasound images to be reviewed as part of Reader study
Device: Mammography
Mammography as available per standard of care
Other Names:
  • Mammo
Experimental: Imagio (IUS+OA)
Read 2 (Test): History + Mammogram (if available) + IUS (stills and videos provided), and Imagio (IUS+OA) (stills and videos provided). Imagio (IUS+OA) POM and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assigned after viewing the SenoGram® output. The dataform is locked.
Device: Mammography
Mammography as available per standard of care
Other Names:
  • Mammo
Device: Reader Study Imagio Ultrasound + Optoacoustic Imaging
Imagio Ultrasound + Optoacoustic images to be reviewed as part of Reader study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gain in Specificity at Fixed 98% Sensitivity (fSp)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up
Primary effectiveness endpoint was the difference (gain) in specificity (fSp) at fixed 98% sensitivity for the Imagio IUS+OA relative to IUS alone, across all 15 independent readers; both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). fSp derived from empirical receiver operating characteristic (ROC) using endpoint interpolation.
Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Negative Likelihood Ratio (NLR)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up
NLR for the Imagio IUS+OA relative to IUS alone, across all 15 independent readers; both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). NLR = [(1-sensitivity) / specificity].
Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up
Positive Likelihood Ratio (PLR)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up
PLR for the Imagio IUS+OA relative to IUS alone, across all 15 independent readers; both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). PLR = [sensitivity / (1-specificity)].
Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up
Partial Area Under the Curve (pAUC)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up
pAUC considers only the region of the area under the ROC curve that corresponds to clinically relevant values of sensitivity, defined as 95% to 100%, for Imagio IUS+OA vs. IUS alone, averaged across 15 readers. Both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). A higher pAUC indicates better diagnostic accuracy.
Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Seno Medical Instruments Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Shaan Schaeffer, Seno Medical

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 30, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 3, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 3, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Reader-02 Study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Reader Study - Imagio Ultrasound

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings