Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of OC-01 Nasal Spray on Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease

October 22, 2021 updated by: Oyster Point Pharma, Inc.

Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Masked, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of OC-01 (Varenicline) Nasal Spray on Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease (The ONSET-2 Study)

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of OC-01 Nasal Spray as compared to placebo on signs and symptoms of dry eye disease.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This was a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-masked (including subjects, Investigators, study site personnel, and Sponsor personnel) study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OC-01 (varenicline) nasal spray 0.6 mg/mL and 1.2 mg/mL in adult participants with DED. The study randomized 758 subjects at least 22 years of age with a physicians' diagnosis of DED and meeting all other study eligibility criteria to receive OC-01 (varenicline) nasal spray or placebo twice daily (BID) for 28 days with three additional long-term follow-up visits at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. Participants who terminated from the study during the treatment period were asked to complete safety assessments (if the participants agree) prior to study exit. Participants who were terminated early from the study were not replaced

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
758

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85032
        • Phoenix
    • California
      • Newport Beach, California, United States, 92663
        • New Port Beach
    • Colorado
      • Fort Collins, Colorado, United States, 80528
        • Fort Collins
    • Connecticut
      • Waterbury, Connecticut, United States, 06708
        • Waterbury
    • Florida
      • Delray Beach, Florida, United States, 33484
        • Delray Beach
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46290
        • Indianapolis
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40206
        • Louisville
    • Massachusetts
      • Raynham, Massachusetts, United States, 02767
        • Raynham
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89052
        • Las Vegas
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27603
        • Raleigh
      • Shelby, North Carolina, United States, 28150
        • Shelby
    • North Dakota
      • Fargo, North Dakota, United States, 58103
        • Fargo
    • Pennsylvania
      • Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania, United States, 16066
        • Cranberry Township
    • Rhode Island
      • Warwick, Rhode Island, United States, 02842
        • Warwick
    • South Dakota
      • Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57108
        • Sioux Falls
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37210
        • Nashville
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
        • Austin
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77025
        • Houston
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • San Antonio
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78209
        • San Antonio
    • Utah
      • Layton, Utah, United States, 84041
        • Layton
    • Virginia
      • Lynchburg, Virginia, United States, 24502
        • Lynchburg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Have used and/or desired to use an artificial tear substitute for dry eye symptoms within 6 months prior to Visit 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have had any intraocular surgery (such as cataract surgery) or extraocular surgery in either eye within three months or refractive surgery (e.g. laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis, laser epithelial keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy or corneal implant) within twelve months of Visit 1.
  • Have a history or presence of any ocular disorder or condition in either eye that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, likely interfere with the interpretation of the study results or participant safety such as significant corneal or conjunctival scarring; pterygium or nodular pinguecula; current ocular infection, conjunctivitis, or inflammation not associated with dry eye; anterior (epithelial) basement membrane corneal dystrophy or other clinically significant corneal dystrophy or degeneration; ocular herpetic infection; evidence of keratoconus; etc. Blepharitis not requiring treatment and mild meibomian gland disease that are typically associated with dry eye disease are allowed.
  • Have a systemic condition or disease not stabilized or judged by the Investigator to be incompatible with participation in the study or with the lengthier assessments required by the study (e.g., current systemic infection, uncontrolled autoimmune disease, uncontrolled immunodeficiency disease, history of myocardial infarction or heart disease, etc.)
  • Have a known hypersensitivity to any of the procedural agents or study drug components
  • Have any condition or history that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with study compliance, outcome measures, safety parameters, and/or the general medical condition of the subject.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (vehicle) nasal spray
Drug: Placebo (vehicle) nasal spray
Placebo (vehicle) nasal spray
Active Comparator: OC-01 Low Dose, 0.6 mg/mL
OC-01 (varenicline) nasal spray, 0.6 mg/ML
Drug: OC-01 (varenicline) nasal spray
OC-01 (varenicline) nasal spray
Active Comparator: OC-01 High Dose, 1.2 mg/mL
OC-01 (varenicline) nasal spray, 1.2 mg/ML
Drug: OC-01 (varenicline) nasal spray
OC-01 (varenicline) nasal spray

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Subjects Who Achieve ≥10 mm Improvement in Schirmer's Test Score From Baseline at Visit 4 (Day 28)
Time Frame: 28 Days [Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 4b (28 days)]
The primary endpoint was the percentage of subjects who achieve ≥10 mm improvement in Schirmer's Test Score from baseline to 28 days in the study eye following treatment with OC-01. Schirmer's test scores from 0-35 mm where a higher score is indicative of a better outcome.
28 Days [Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 4b (28 days)]

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in Eye Dryness Score in CAE at Week 4 at 5 Minutes
Time Frame: 28 Days [Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 4a (28 days)]
Change in Eye Dryness Score Eye from baseline in CAE at 4 Weeks at 5 minutes post treatment. Eye dryness score on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 (no dryness) to 100 (maximum dryness) millimeters where a lower score is indicative of a better outcome.
28 Days [Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 4a (28 days)]
Mean Change From Baseline in Eye Dryness Score From Baseline to Day 28
Time Frame: 28 Days [Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 4b (28 days)]
Change in Eye Dryness Score Eye from baseline to 28 days. Eye dryness score on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 (no dryness) to 100 (maximum dryness) millimeters where a lower score is indicative of a better outcome.
28 Days [Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 4b (28 days)]
Mean Change Form Baseline in Schirmer's Test Score From Baseline to Day 28
Time Frame: 28 Days [Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 4b (28 days)]
Change in Schirmer test score from baseline to Day 28. Schirmer's test scores from 0-35 mm where a higher score is indicative of a better outcome.
28 Days [Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 4b (28 days)]
Mean Change From Baseline in Eye Dryness Score in the Study Eye at Week 2
Time Frame: 14 Days [Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 3 (14 days)]
Chang in Eye Dryness Score Eye from baseline to 28 days. Eye dryness score on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 (no dryness) to 100 (maximum dryness) millimeters where a lower score is indicative of a better otucome.
14 Days [Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 3 (14 days)]
Mean Change From Baseline in Eye Dryness Score in the Study Eye at Week 1
Time Frame: 7 Days [Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 2 (7 days)]
Change in Eye Dryness Score Eye from baseline to 28 days. Eye dryness score on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 (no dryness) to 100 (maximum dryness) millimeters where a lower score is indicative of a better outcome.
7 Days [Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 2 (7 days)]

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Oyster Point Pharma, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 23, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 5, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 22, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OPP-101

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings