Autoreactive B Cells in Membranous Nephropathy (PEPTIDE)

March 19, 2026 updated by: Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research

PLA2R Autoreactive B-Cell Subsets and Immune Cell Monitoring in Membranous Nephropathy: Identification of Outcome Predictors and Novel Insights Into Disease Pathogenesis

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most frequent cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in adults. The majority of MN patients show detectable circulating antibodies against the M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R). Infusion of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies results in a profound depletion of B-cells, which are thought to be responsible for anti-PLA2R production. B-cell depletion is followed by NS remission in 70% of cases. Limited evidence highlighted that differences in the B- and T-cell compartments may exist between responders and non-responders. Owing to the non-homogenous efficacy of anti-CD20 treatment, investigators hypothesize that in MN patients who experience NS remission after B-cell depleting therapy, autoreactive B-cells may be mostly circulating, whereas in patients who do not respond to the same treatment, autoreactive B-cells may chiefly reside into secondary lymphoid organs - and thus be more resistant to the drug action. Researchers will therefore extensively analyze the circulating immune repertoire of MN patients before and after the infusion of B-cell lineage depleting agents, assessing the presence of circulating PLA2R autoreactive B cells from appropriately stratified responder and non-responder patients. Patients and healthy controls will be enrolled in this study. Patients will be stratified according to gender, anti-PLA2R status, type of B-cell lineage depleting agent received and response to treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
86

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • BG
      • Ranica, BG, Italy, 24020
        • Recruiting
        • Centro di Ricerche Cliniche per le Malattie Rare " Aldo e Cele Daccò"
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with biopsy-proven idiopathic MN, who are candidate to receive (prospective cohort) or who already received (retrospective cohort) a B-cell depleting treatment as per center clinical practice and healthy volunteers as controls

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients inclusion criteria

  • Males and females.
  • Adults (> 18 years old).
  • Patients with biopsy-proven idiopathic MN, who are candidate to receive (prospective cohort) or who already received (retrospective cohort) a B-cell depleting treatment as per center clinical practice.
  • Mental state is such that they are able to understand and give valid consent to the study;
  • Written informed consent according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Healthy volunteers inclusion criteria

  • Male and female (>18 years) not known to suffer of any significant illness;
  • Not assuming any medication or drug on a regular basis;
  • Negative urine analysis (urine dipstick, multistick);
  • Written informed consent according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients exclusion criteria

  • Reasonable possibility of a secondary cause of MN (e.g.systemic lupus erythematosus, active hepatitis B, malignancy, drugs such as gold salts and penicillamine).
  • Legal incapacity, intellectual disability/mental retardation, dementia, uncooperative attitude or any other evidence that patient will not be able to understand the study procedures and aims and to give written informed consent.

Healthy volunteers exclusion criteria

- Legal incapacity, intellectual disability/mental retardation, dementia, uncooperative attitude or any other evidence that patient will not be able to understand the study procedures and aims and to give written informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Other

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Prospective cohort
Patients with biopsy-proven idiopathic MN, who are candidate to receive a B-cell depleting treatment as per center clinical practice.
Diagnostic test: In vitro assays.
Biochemical and flow-cytometry analysis of specimen collected.
Retrospective cohort
Patients with biopsy-proven idiopathic MN, who already received a B-cell depleting treatment as per center clinical practice.
Diagnostic test: In vitro assays.
Biochemical and flow-cytometry analysis of specimen collected.
Healthy volunteers cohort
Subjects > 18 years not known to suffer of any significant illness, not assuming any medication or drug on a regular basis.
Diagnostic test: In vitro assays.
Biochemical and flow-cytometry analysis of specimen collected.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Differences between anti-PLA2R positive MN patients and anti-PLA2R negative MN patients and healthy controls in the frequency of anti-PLA2R autoreactive circulating B-cells.
Time Frame: Changes from baseline and 3,6,9,12 and 24 month.
Changes from baseline and 3,6,9,12 and 24 month.
Differences between anti-PLA2R positive MN patients and anti-PLA2R negative MN patients and healthy controls in the frequency of immunoglobulin- and cytokine-secreting circulating B-cell subsets in resting and stimulated conditions.
Time Frame: Changes from baseline and 3,6,9,12 and 24 month.
Changes from baseline and 3,6,9,12 and 24 month.
Differences between anti-PLA2R positive MN patients and anti-PLA2R negative MN patients and healthy controls in spontaneous / stimulated immunoglobulin (including anti-PLA2R) and cytokine release from circulating B-cell subpopulations.
Time Frame: Changes from baseline and 3,6,9,12 and 24 month.
Changes from baseline and 3,6,9,12 and 24 month.
Differences between MN patients and healthy controls, and between responders and non-responders in the frequency of circulating B-cell subpopulations.
Time Frame: Changes from baseline and 3,6,9,12 and 24 month.
Changes from baseline and 3,6,9,12 and 24 month.
Differences between MN patients and healthy controls, and between responders and non-responders in the frequency of circulating T-cell, NK-cell, monocyte and dendritic cell subpopulations.
Time Frame: Changes from baseline and 3,6,9,12 and 24 month.
Changes from baseline and 3,6,9,12 and 24 month.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 25, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 19, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PEPTIDE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Membranous Nephropathy

Clinical Trials on In vitro assays.

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings