Efficacy of Dienogest Versus Oral Contraceptive Pills on Pain Associated With Endometriosis

April 14, 2021 updated by: Antoine Abou Moussa, American University of Beirut Medical Center
Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease, frequently associated with dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and abdomino-pelvic pain limiting quality of life. Most medical therapies aim to alleviate the severity of symptoms. Recent guidelines recommend the use of either OCPs or progestins as a first-line treatment of pain associated with endometriosis. The effectiveness of both OCPs and dienogest, a fourth-generation progestin, for endometriosis treatment has been demonstrated. The literature is rich with data comparing the use of Visanne or OCPs to placebo or GnRH analogs. However, there are no head to head studies comparing their efficacy in the management of endometriosis associated pain. The study aims to evaluate if Dienogest (Visanne) is not inferior in efficacy to oral contraceptive pills (Yasmin) in controlling pain associated with endometriosis?

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, which induces a chronic inflammatory reaction. It is an estrogen-dependent associated with pelvic pain and infertility. It is a relatively common chronic gynecological disease that affects approximately 10% of reproductive aged women. Patients with endometriosis often suffer from dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dysuria, and chronic abdominal or pelvic pain, resulting in a severely limited quality of life. The aim of most medical therapies is to alleviate the severity of symptoms. Commonly used hormonal therapies include combined oral contraceptives (OCP), progestogens, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, androgens and antiprogestogens, all of which are considered to have similar efficacy but different tolerability profiles, which are often suboptimal. To date, the most widely used agent for the medical treatment of endometriosis is oral contraceptive (albeit off-label). In particular, evidence supporting the efficacy of estrogen-progestin therapy (EP) in pain control and reducing the risk of recurrence in women undergoing surgery for endometriosis. In recent years, the effectiveness of dienogest, a fourth-generation progestin, for endometriosis treatment has been demonstrated. Dienogest seems to be as effective as gonadotrophin-releasing hormone-a (GnRH-a) in terms of endometriosis-related pelvic pain improvement. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Visanne versus OCP treatment of endometriosis associated pelvic pain in a double-blinded randomized controlled pilot study. It is a two armed pilot study; each group will include 50 patients. Women with endometriosis will be randomized to receive either DNG (n=50) or OCPs (n=50). The diagnosis of endometriosis will be by clinical evaluation, laparotomy, laparoscopy, or imaging analysis (combination of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography) of endometriotic ovarian chocolate cysts.The first group will receive Deinogest (Visanne) 2mg/day, orally for 24 weeks. The second group will receive monophasic combined OCP (Yasmin, Ethinyl Estradiol and Drospirenone) daily for 24 weeks. The treating physician and the patients will be blinded to the treatment option. The relief of symptoms and efficacy will be evaluated by questionnaire on follow up visits at 3 and 6 month of the treatment. Data collected will be analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. We hypothesize that there will be no difference in pain scores, efficacy and safety between the two treatments.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Antoine Abu Musa, M.D.
  • Phone Number: 5840 +9611350000
  • Email: aa06@aub.edu.lb

Study Locations

  • Lebanon
      • Beirut, Lebanon
        • Recruiting
        • American University of Beirut
        • Contact:
          • Antoine Abu Musa, MD
          • Phone Number: 4840 +9611350000
          • Email: aa06@aub.edu.lb

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients confirmed or suspected of endometriosis on clinical evaluation (VAS score more than 5 and presence of subjective symptoms), surgical or imaging studies, and not taking any pain killer or other hormonal treatment for the moment
  • Age 20-45
  • Regular menstrual cycles
  • The presence of subjective symptoms during menstruation (at least one from among lower abdominal pain, lumbago, defecation pain, nausea, and headache)
  • The presence of subjective symptoms during non-menstruation (at least one from among lower abdominal pain, lumbago, defecation pain, dyspareunia, and pain on internal examination).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Undiagnosed genital bleeding
  • Use of any hormonal therapy for endometriosis within 16 weeks before enrollment
  • A history of severe adverse drug reactions or hypersensitivity to steroid hormone
  • Having undergone surgery therapy or surgical examination for endometriosis within a menstrual cycle before the start of medication
  • Previous failure of treatment with the OCP used in the current study
  • Contraindications to OCP or Dienogest use
  • Smokers >35
  • A history or complication of thrombosis/embolism
  • Migraines with aura
  • Depression
  • Patients on anti-epileptics
  • Diabetes Mellitus with vascular involvement
  • Liver diseases
  • Known or suspected sex hormone dependent malignancies
  • Repeat surgery for endometriosis
  • Patient consulting for infertility
  • Pregnant or nursing
  • Planning for pregnancy in near future.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Dienogest
Deinogest (Visanne) 2mg/day orally for 24 weeks
Drug: Dienogest 2 MG Oral Tablet
Deinogest (Visanne) 2mg/day, orally for 24 weeks versus combined OCP (Yasmin, 0.03mg
Other Names:
  • Visanne
Active Comparator: Oral Contraceptive Pills
Oral contraceptive pill (Yasmin, 0.03mg Ethinyl Estradiol and 3mg Drospirenone) orally daily for 24 weeks
Drug: Yasmin
0.03mg Ethinyl Estradiol and 3mg Drospirenone daily for 24 weeks
Other Names:
  • combined oral contraceptive

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Endometriosis-associated pelvic pain
Time Frame: 6 months
be the absolute change in endometriosis -associated pelvic pain from baseline to end of treatment, assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): with "absence of pain" corresponding to the value "0" and "unbearable pain" corresponding to the value "10"
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact on Quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months
Outcome quality of life will be assessed using Endometriosis Health Profile 30 (EHP30) with each item of this questionnaire can be answered by choosing one of the following (Never, rarely,sometimes, often and always). The endometriosis health profile is a patient-generated questionnaire in which the items were developed from interviews with women with the condition ( Obtained from Oxford University Press) .
6 months
incidence of side effects
Time Frame: 6 months
Incidence of possible side effects including headache, migraine,nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain/discomfort, breast pain or tenderness, mood swings, premenstrual syndrome, decreased libido, fatigue, weight changes and menstrual irregularities
6 months
Patient Tolerability
Time Frame: 6 months
Assessing tolerability to side effects via numerical scale from zero to ten ( zero not bothersome at all , ten maximum possible)
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
American University of Beirut Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Antoine Abu Musa, MD, American University of Beirut Medical center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 14, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OGY.AA.07

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings