Buprenorphine Loading in the Emergency Department

March 18, 2024 updated by: NYU Langone Health
Buprenorphine (BUP) is FDA-approved for the treatment of opioid withdrawal and opioid use disorder. Few ED providers have received the necessary DEA registration (aka X waiver) required to prescribe BUP, and urgent appointments to continue ongoing BUP treatment may not be readily available, thus leading to medication discontinuity. A loading dose induction strategy with 32mg of BUP may help effectively link ED patients to outpatient treatment while minimizing known barriers to ED uptake. Administering a "loading dose" of BUP to saturate mu-opioid receptors would extend the duration of action and provide additional time to secure ongoing treatment. Further, BUP's ceiling effect on respiratory depression makes it a remarkably safe drug even at high doses. In recent years, ED providers have begun to incorporate this approach into clinical protocols, however, it has not been formally studied in this clinical setting. The investigator's study represents the necessary step of studying this novel approach in the ED setting to define the parameters for clinical protocols and large-scale studies.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A novel induction strategy, in which a loading dose of Buprenorphine (BUP) 32mg is administered, has the potential to mitigate barriers to treatment initiation. ED providers can treat patients with BUP for opioid withdrawal since DEA registration (X-waiver) is not required unless they wish to issue a prescription. Current BUP induction protocols, developed for inpatient and ambulatory care settings as well as for unobserved self- administration via prescription, usually recommend a first day dose of 8mg given in divided doses of 2- 4mg. However, patients discharged with ≤ 8mg SL total dose may experience return of withdrawal symptoms and/or opioid craving within only 4 hours.Treatment with a loading dose of 32mg in the ED may provide the necessary bridge treatment, relieving symptoms of withdrawal until a patient is able to attend a follow up appointment for further treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
15

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • NYU Langone

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Is able to speak English sufficiently to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Meets DSM-5 criteria for moderate to severe OUD
  • Has a positive urine screen for opioids and a negative urine screen for methadone
  • Must be experiencing opioid withdrawal with a COWS score ≥8
  • Is willing and able to participate in the study and follow study procedures
  • Is able to provide adequate and reliable locator information for follow-up
  • Has reliable access to a phone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Is currently engaged in medication treatment for OUD with methadone, BUP, or naltrexone
  • Has a urine toxicology test that is positive for methadone or buprenorphine
  • Currently requires prescribed opioids for treatment of an ongoing pain condition
  • Has a known allergy to BUP
  • Is pregnant as determined by urine hCG testing at the index ED visit
  • Is breastfeeding as determined by self-report
  • Has medical, psychiatric, or concurrent substance use conditions or severe cognitive impairment which might prelude safe participation
  • Is a prisoner or in police custody at the time of the index ED visit
  • Has previously enrolled in the current study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: BUP treatment arm
Subjects will be given BUP 32mg in 2 doses, and observed for at least 90 minutes after the 2nd dose. The whole process will take a total of about 3-4 hours including the consenting process. Subjects will be asked questions and be examined repeatedly. Subjects will have 4 in-person visits and a phone call in addition to review of medical records.
Drug: Buprenorphine Naloxone
Participants will receive the BUP SL 32mg in divided doses rather than all at once. If after the initial 8mg dose a participant experiences over-sedation or another adverse event that would preclude further dosing, such as an allergic reaction, the subsequent dose will not be administered and the patient will be withdrawn from the study. The participant will be reassessed for other possible etiologies for these symptoms.
Other Names:
  • Suboxone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Successful Rapid Induction
Time Frame: Day 0
This will be measured by the proportion of participants who report Successful Rapid Induction. Participants will receive a loading dose of BUP SL 32mg in the ED without experiencing a clinically significant serious and/or severe adverse event (AE) related to the intervention - specifically, the receipt of a dose of BUP SL greater than 8mg during the Index ED visit. Successful rapid induction is defined only by the outcome of the participant's visit, and not by any following research visits.
Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid Withdrawal at Conclusion of Index Visit as Measured by the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS)
Time Frame: Index ED Visit 1(Day 0)
The Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) is an 11-item scale designed to be administered by a clinician. The tool can be used in both inpatient and outpatient settings to reproducibly rate common signs and symptoms of withdrawal and monitor these symptoms over time. The summed score can be used to help clinicians determine the stage or severity of withdrawal and assess the level of physical dependence on opioids. The total score ranges from 0 to 48. The interpretation of scores is as follows: 5-12 = mild; 13-24 = moderate; 25-36 = moderately severe; more than 36 = severe withdrawal.
Index ED Visit 1(Day 0)
Number of Participants With Withdrawal Suppresion at Day 1 (24 Hours)
Time Frame: Day 1 (24 hours)
Participants who had suppression of opioid withdrawal within 24 hours of receipt of buprenorphine at the index visit as measured by having none of the following: 1) having a COWS score of >7 at the Day 1 research visit, 2) having objective signs of opioid withdrawal as assessed by a medical clinician, or 3) participant self-report of opioid use to treat opioid withdrawal.
Day 1 (24 hours)
Number of Participants With Withdrawal Suppresion by Day 2
Time Frame: Day 2
Participants who had suppression of opioid withdrawal within 48 hours of receipt of buprenorphine at the index visit as measured by having none of the following: 1) having a COWS score of >7 at the Day 1 research visit, 2) having objective signs of opioid withdrawal as assessed by a medical clinician, or 3) participant self-report of opioid use to treat opioid withdrawal.
Day 2
Number of Participants With Withdrawal Suppression on Day 3
Time Frame: Day 3
Participants who had suppression of opioid withdrawal within 72 hours of receipt of buprenorphine at the index visit as measured by having none of the following: 1) having a COWS score of >7 at the Day 1 research visit, 2) having objective signs of opioid withdrawal as assessed by a medical clinician, or 3) participant self-report of opioid use to treat opioid withdrawal.
Day 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
NYU Langone Health

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Emergency Medicine Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ryan McCormack, MD, NYU Langone

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 25, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 25, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 25, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 18, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 19-01700

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The investigator who proposed to use the data. Upon reasonable request. Requests should be directed to Ryan.McCormack@nyulangone.org. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings