Efficacy of Ivabradine in Patient With Both Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure With Reduce Ejection Fraction

March 11, 2020 updated by: Chun-Yao Huang

Efficacy of Ivabradine as a Treatment Modality for Both Rate Control and Heart Failure Medication in Patient With Both Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure With Reduce and Mid-range Ejection Fraction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. Previous studies have shown that rate control strategy in AF is non-inferior to rhythm control strategy, in terms of stroke and mortality risk. In addition, rate control strategy is associated with lower risk of hospitalization and non-cardiovascular mortality. Therefore, rate control is an essential strategy to improve quality of life, decrease morbidity and prevent tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy in AF patients. The recommended rate control agents include beta-blocker, nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker (CCB), digoxin and amiodarone. However, in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patient, the medication of rate control were beta-blocker than digoxin. But several clinical observation study show excess mortality in AF patients. Ivabradine, a If inhibitor, it is well-established that a pacemaker current, If current, is functionally expressed in the sinus node . Previous studies have shown that Ivabradine, If inhibitor, significantly reduces sinus rate and improves prognosis in patients with systolic heart failure. Interestingly, several investigators found that hyperpolarization- activated cyclic nucleotidylated channel 4 current (HCN4), the main isoform of the channel responsible for If current, is also functionally expressed in the Atrioventricular node(AV node). Recent data have shown that inhibition of If current slows AV node conduction in animals and humans. Thus, we want to compare the effect of Ivabradine on ventricular rate with digoxin in this study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Taipei Medical University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation(24hr ECG) with HFrEF and HFmrEF.
  2. After maximal tolerance dose beta-blocker(Bisoprolol 20mg/day，Carvedilol 50mg/day) or intolerant to beta-blocker the resting heart rate from ECG is still faster than 100 or resting heart rate from ECG is greater than 80 but still with symptoms of short of breath and palpitation.
  3. Stable heart rhythm medication.(no change of medication in recently one week)
  4. Age 20 to 90 years old.
  5. The subject must be an adult who can read himself/herself and walk independently.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Used medication with interaction with digoxin : Clarithromycin, Erythromycin, Azithromycin, ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir, Doxycycline, Minocycline, tetracycline。
  2. Used medication with interaction with ivabradine: voriconazole, posaconazole, fluconazole, Ombitasvir, Dasabuvir, Carbamazepine, Enzalutamide, Fosphenytoin, Mitotane, Phenobarbital, Phenytoin, Rifampicin
  3. Cardiogenic shock.
  4. History of symptomatic bradycardia.
  5. Renal insufficiency:eGFR<30 ml/min/1.73m2
  6. Pregnancy
  7. Heart failure due to congenital heart
  8. Severe hypotension(<90/50mmHg)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Ivabradine
Subject will be randomly assigned to either Ivabradine or Digoxin group. Ivabradine starting dose is 2.5 mg twice daily(BID). ECG will be performed at each visit during the treatment phase and dose will be adjusted based on the heart rate result from the ECG. Total treatment phase is 16 weeks ( 4 months).
Drug: Ivabradine 5 mg [Corlanor]
Starting dose: Ivabradine 2.5mg twice daily (BID) Max Dose: Ivabradine 7.5 mg twice daily (BID)
Active Comparator: Digoxin
Subject will be randomly assigned to either Ivabradine or Digoxin group. Digoxin starting dose is 0.125mg once daily(QD) in estimated Glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)>60， 0.125mg every other day (QOD) in estimated Glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)<60. Dose adjustment will be based on heart rate result from ECG performed at each treatment visit and Digoxin level from blood sample collected from each visit during treatment phase. Total treatment phase is 16 weeks ( 4 months).
Drug: Digoxin 0.25 mg
Starting dose: 0.125mg once daily (QD) in estimated Glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)>60， 0.125mg once every other day (QOD) in estimated Glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)<60 Max dose: 0.25 once daily (QD)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate change
Time Frame: 24 hr ECG test will be performed at Screening phase and End of Treatment visit(Visit5/Week 16).
To compare Heart Rate change monitored from 24 hr ECG. Test will be performed at Baseline (screening phase, 4 weeks time between screening/Informed consent and Randomization visit) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16). Total treatment phase is 16 weeks.
24 hr ECG test will be performed at Screening phase and End of Treatment visit(Visit5/Week 16).
6 minute walk test change
Time Frame: Test will be performed at Randomization visit (V1/Week0) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16).
To compare 6 minute walking test walking distance change between Randomization visit(Visit 1/Week 0) and treatment completion(Visit 5/Week 16). Total Treatment phase is 16 weeks.
Test will be performed at Randomization visit (V1/Week0) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16).
N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide(NT-Pro BNP) change
Time Frame: Blood sample will be collected at Screening phase and End of Treatment visit(Visit5/Week 16).
To compare NT-Pro BNP change from blood sample collected at Baseline (screening phase, 4 weeks time between screening/informed consent and Randomization visit) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16). Total treatment phase is 16 weeks.
Blood sample will be collected at Screening phase and End of Treatment visit(Visit5/Week 16).
1-10 Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale change
Time Frame: Borg's score will be tested at Randomization visit (V1/Week0) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16).
To compare 1-10 Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale change between Randomization visit (Visit1/Week0) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16). Total Treatment phase is 16 weeks. The number 1-10 Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale will be obtained pre and post 6 minutes walk test. The value of 1-10 Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale pre 6 minutes walking test will be compared between Randomization visit (Visit1/Week0) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16), and the same type of comparison will be performed for 1-10 Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale values post 6 minute walk test. Rating score is as below: 0=Rest, 1=really easy, 2=easy, 3=moderate, 4=sort of hard, 5=hard, 6= between 5 and 7, 7=really hard, 8=between 7 and 9, 9=really really hard, 10=Maximal: just like my hardest race. Decrease in score value compared between Randomization visit (Visit1/Week0) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16) represents better outcome.
Borg's score will be tested at Randomization visit (V1/Week0) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chun-Yao Huang

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 26, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 11, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • N201801089

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings