Efficacy of Ivabradine in Patient With Both Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure With Reduce Ejection Fraction

March 11, 2020 updated by: Chun-Yao Huang

Efficacy of Ivabradine as a Treatment Modality for Both Rate Control and Heart Failure Medication in Patient With Both Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure With Reduce and Mid-range Ejection Fraction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. Previous studies have shown that rate control strategy in AF is non-inferior to rhythm control strategy, in terms of stroke and mortality risk. In addition, rate control strategy is associated with lower risk of hospitalization and non-cardiovascular mortality. Therefore, rate control is an essential strategy to improve quality of life, decrease morbidity and prevent tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy in AF patients. The recommended rate control agents include beta-blocker, nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker (CCB), digoxin and amiodarone. However, in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patient, the medication of rate control were beta-blocker than digoxin. But several clinical observation study show excess mortality in AF patients. Ivabradine, a If inhibitor, it is well-established that a pacemaker current, If current, is functionally expressed in the sinus node . Previous studies have shown that Ivabradine, If inhibitor, significantly reduces sinus rate and improves prognosis in patients with systolic heart failure. Interestingly, several investigators found that hyperpolarization- activated cyclic nucleotidylated channel 4 current (HCN4), the main isoform of the channel responsible for If current, is also functionally expressed in the Atrioventricular node(AV node). Recent data have shown that inhibition of If current slows AV node conduction in animals and humans. Thus, we want to compare the effect of Ivabradine on ventricular rate with digoxin in this study.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Taipei Medical University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation(24hr ECG) with HFrEF and HFmrEF.
  2. After maximal tolerance dose beta-blocker(Bisoprolol 20mg/day,Carvedilol 50mg/day) or intolerant to beta-blocker the resting heart rate from ECG is still faster than 100 or resting heart rate from ECG is greater than 80 but still with symptoms of short of breath and palpitation.
  3. Stable heart rhythm medication.(no change of medication in recently one week)
  4. Age 20 to 90 years old.
  5. The subject must be an adult who can read himself/herself and walk independently.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Used medication with interaction with digoxin : Clarithromycin, Erythromycin, Azithromycin, ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir, Doxycycline, Minocycline, tetracycline。
  2. Used medication with interaction with ivabradine: voriconazole, posaconazole, fluconazole, Ombitasvir, Dasabuvir, Carbamazepine, Enzalutamide, Fosphenytoin, Mitotane, Phenobarbital, Phenytoin, Rifampicin
  3. Cardiogenic shock.
  4. History of symptomatic bradycardia.
  5. Renal insufficiency:eGFR<30 ml/min/1.73m2
  6. Pregnancy
  7. Heart failure due to congenital heart
  8. Severe hypotension(<90/50mmHg)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ivabradine
Subject will be randomly assigned to either Ivabradine or Digoxin group. Ivabradine starting dose is 2.5 mg twice daily(BID). ECG will be performed at each visit during the treatment phase and dose will be adjusted based on the heart rate result from the ECG. Total treatment phase is 16 weeks ( 4 months).
Starting dose: Ivabradine 2.5mg twice daily (BID) Max Dose: Ivabradine 7.5 mg twice daily (BID)
Active Comparator: Digoxin
Subject will be randomly assigned to either Ivabradine or Digoxin group. Digoxin starting dose is 0.125mg once daily(QD) in estimated Glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)>60, 0.125mg every other day (QOD) in estimated Glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)<60. Dose adjustment will be based on heart rate result from ECG performed at each treatment visit and Digoxin level from blood sample collected from each visit during treatment phase. Total treatment phase is 16 weeks ( 4 months).
Starting dose: 0.125mg once daily (QD) in estimated Glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)>60, 0.125mg once every other day (QOD) in estimated Glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)<60 Max dose: 0.25 once daily (QD)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate change
Time Frame: 24 hr ECG test will be performed at Screening phase and End of Treatment visit(Visit5/Week 16).
To compare Heart Rate change monitored from 24 hr ECG. Test will be performed at Baseline (screening phase, 4 weeks time between screening/Informed consent and Randomization visit) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16). Total treatment phase is 16 weeks.
24 hr ECG test will be performed at Screening phase and End of Treatment visit(Visit5/Week 16).
6 minute walk test change
Time Frame: Test will be performed at Randomization visit (V1/Week0) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16).
To compare 6 minute walking test walking distance change between Randomization visit(Visit 1/Week 0) and treatment completion(Visit 5/Week 16). Total Treatment phase is 16 weeks.
Test will be performed at Randomization visit (V1/Week0) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16).
N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide(NT-Pro BNP) change
Time Frame: Blood sample will be collected at Screening phase and End of Treatment visit(Visit5/Week 16).
To compare NT-Pro BNP change from blood sample collected at Baseline (screening phase, 4 weeks time between screening/informed consent and Randomization visit) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16). Total treatment phase is 16 weeks.
Blood sample will be collected at Screening phase and End of Treatment visit(Visit5/Week 16).
1-10 Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale change
Time Frame: Borg's score will be tested at Randomization visit (V1/Week0) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16).
To compare 1-10 Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale change between Randomization visit (Visit1/Week0) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16). Total Treatment phase is 16 weeks. The number 1-10 Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale will be obtained pre and post 6 minutes walk test. The value of 1-10 Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale pre 6 minutes walking test will be compared between Randomization visit (Visit1/Week0) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16), and the same type of comparison will be performed for 1-10 Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale values post 6 minute walk test. Rating score is as below: 0=Rest, 1=really easy, 2=easy, 3=moderate, 4=sort of hard, 5=hard, 6= between 5 and 7, 7=really hard, 8=between 7 and 9, 9=really really hard, 10=Maximal: just like my hardest race. Decrease in score value compared between Randomization visit (Visit1/Week0) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16) represents better outcome.
Borg's score will be tested at Randomization visit (V1/Week0) and treatment completion (Visit 5/Week 16).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 26, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Ivabradine 5 mg [Corlanor]

Subscribe