A Study Evaluating JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® XC Injectable Gel for Correction of Temple Hollowing in Adult Participants ≥ 22 Years Old

March 29, 2024 updated by: Allergan

A Multicenter, Evaluator-blinded, Randomized, Parallel-group, Controlled Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® XC Injectable Gel for Correction of Temple Hollowing

The objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Juvederm® Voluma® XC injectable gel in adult participants seeking correction of temple hollowing

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
205

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Puerto Rico
      • San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00917
        • Jose Raul Montes Eyes & Facial Rejuvenation-Torre Medica Aux /ID# 232706
  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90069
        • Skin Care and Laser Physicians of Beverly Hills /ID# 232967
      • Newport Beach, California, United States, 92663
        • Steve Yoelin MD Medical Associate Inc /ID# 232956
    • Florida
      • Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33431
        • Steven Fagien MD PA /ID# 232807
      • Bradenton, Florida, United States, 34209
        • Bradenton Dermatologist /ID# 232822
      • Coral Gables, Florida, United States, 33134
        • Hevia Cosmetic Dermatology /ID# 232824
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33137-3254
        • Skin and Cancer Associates, LLP /ID# 232923
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33401-2712
        • Research Institute of the Southeast, LLC /ID# 233144
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70115
        • Delricht Research /ID# 233142
    • Maryland
      • Glenn Dale, Maryland, United States, 20769-9182
        • Callender Center for Clinical Research /ID# 233167
    • Massachusetts
      • Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States, 02467
        • Skincare Physicians /ID# 233054
    • New York
      • Latham, New York, United States, 12110
        • Williams Plastic Surgery Specialists /ID# 232789
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27517-9901
        • Aesthetic Solutions /ID# 232953
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • The Practice of Brian S. Biesman MD PLLC /ID# 232662
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • Dallas Plastic Surgery Institute /ID# 232971

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants in general good health
  • Participants seeking improvement of temple hollowing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Temple hollowing due to trauma, congenital malformations, or lipodystrophy
  • Temporomandibular joint dysfunction or any other jaw issues
  • Recurrent temporal headaches such as temporal tendinitis migraine
  • Active autoimmune disease
  • History of anaphylaxis or allergy to lidocaine (or any amide-based anesthetics), HA products, or Streptococcal protein
  • Prior facial reconstructive surgeries, facelift, or browlift as well as surgeries on the temple area (eg, biopsy)
  • Fat injection or permanent facial implants anywhere in the face
  • Semipermanent soft-tissue filler treatment in the temple or mid-face within 36 months before enrollment
  • Temporary dermal filler injections above the subnasale within 24 months before enrollment
  • Mesotherapy or cosmetic facial procedures above the subnasale within 6 months before enrollment
  • Botulinum toxin treatment above the subnasale within 6 months before enrollment
  • Females who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: No Treatment then JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® XC
Participants received no treatment for 3 months during the Control Period. They either exited the study at Month 3 or received an optional treatment with JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® XC injectable gel treatment in both temples during the Post-Control Period and an optional touch-up treatment 30 days later. Participants did not receive any treatment during the Maintenance Treatment Period.
Device: JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® XC
JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® XC injectable gel
Other: No-treatment control
Participants received no treatment for 3 months during the Control Period.
Experimental: JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® XC
Participants received JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® XC injectable gel treatment in both temples during the Control Period followed by an optional touch-up treatment 30 days later. Participants exited the study at Month 13 or received an optional maintenance treatment and were followed for 6 months during the Maintenance Treatment Period.
Device: JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® XC
JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® XC injectable gel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 1-grade Improvement From Baseline in the Validated Allergan Temple Hollowing Scale (ATHS) Based on Evaluating Investigator (EI) Assessment at Month 3
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3 (Control Period)
The Evaluating Investigator assessed the participant's temple hollowing using the 5-point ATHS scale where 0=convex, rounded temple and 4=severe, deeply recessed, sunken appearance. A 1-point decrease from Baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Month 3 (Control Period)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: From the time of informed consent until the participant exited the study, up to 13 months after their initial/touch-up treatment, and up to 6 months after the maintenance treatment
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant whether or not it is related to the investigational product. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of the investigational product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs) are defined as any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first use of the investigational product.
From the time of informed consent until the participant exited the study, up to 13 months after their initial/touch-up treatment, and up to 6 months after the maintenance treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With a Score of "Improved " or "Much Improved" on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) for the Temple Area as Assessed by the Evaluating Investigator (EI) at Month 3
Time Frame: Month 3 (Control Period)
The Evaluating Investigator assessed the participant's temple area using the 5-point GAIS where: 2=much improved, 1=improved, 0=no change, -1=worse and -2=much worse.
Month 3 (Control Period)
Percentage of Participants With a Score of "Improved" or "Much Improved" on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) for the Temple Area as Assessed by the Participants at Month 3
Time Frame: Month 3 (Control Period)
Participants assessed their temple area using the 5-point GAIS where: 2=much improved, 1=improved, 0=no change, -1=worse and -2=much worse.
Month 3 (Control Period)
Change From Baseline on FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance Questionnaire at Month 3
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3 (Control Period)
The participants responded to each item on the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance questionnaire using a 4-point scale where: 1=Very Dissatisfied, 2=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 3=Somewhat Satisfied, and 4=Very Satisfied. The total score was transformed to a score of 0 (worst) to 100 (best) for comparison. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Month 3 (Control Period)
Change From Baseline to Month 3 on Participants Responses on FACE-Q Satisfaction With Temples Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3 (Control Period)
The participants responded to each item on the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Temples questionnaire using a 4-point scale where: 1=Very Dissatisfied, 2=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 3=Somewhat Satisfied, 4=Very Satisfied. The total score was transformed to a score of 0 (worst) to 100 (best) for comparison. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Month 3 (Control Period)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Allergan

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: ALLERGAN, INC., Allergan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 28, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 17, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 17, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1878-702-008

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols, analyses plans, clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

For details on when studies are available for sharing visit https://vivli.org/ourmember/abbvie/

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to this clinical trial data can be requested by any qualified researchers who engage in rigorous independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and statistical analysis plan and execution of a data sharing statement. Data requests can be submitted at any time after approval in the US and/or EU and a primary manuscript is accepted for publication. For more information on the process, or to submit a request, visit the following link https://www.abbvieclinicaltrials.com/hcp/data-sharing/

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Temple Hollowing

Clinical Trials on JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® XC

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings