A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® XC Injectable Gel for Cheek Augmentation Using Cannula

August 1, 2019 updated by: Allergan

A Multicenter, Single-blind, Randomized, Controlled Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® XC Injectable Gel for Cheek Augmentation Using Cannula

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® XC injectable gel using cannula in participants seeking correction of age-related volume deficit in the mid-face.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90069
        • Skin Care and Laser Physicians of Beverly Hills
      • Solana Beach, California, United States, 92075
        • Art of Skin MD
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33137
        • Baumann Cosmetic and Research Institute
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63122
        • Saint Louis University Dermatology
    • New Jersey
      • Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
        • Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of NY/NJ
    • New York
      • White Plains, New York, United States, 10604
        • Rhoda S. Narins, MD, PC
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27517
        • Aesthetic Solutions, PA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Male or female aged 35 to 65 (inclusive) years of age with overall mid-face severity of Moderate, Significant, or Severe for both cheeks on the Mid-Face Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS);

Exclusion criteria:

  • Has any facial procedures or trauma that may interfere with the study procedures and results;
  • Has a history of anaphylaxis or allergy to lidocaine (or any amide-based anesthetics), hyaluronic acid (HA) products, or Streptococcal protein, or is planning to undergo allergen desensitization therapy during the term of the study;
  • Has active autoimmune disease;
  • Has current cutaneous or mucosal inflammatory or infectious processes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® XC Injectable Gel with Cannula
Participants had 1 cheek treated with JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® XC injectable gel with cannula.
Participants had 1 cheek treated with JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® XC injectable gel with cannula.
Other: JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® XC Injectable Gel with Needle
Participants had 1 cheek treated with JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® XC injectable gel with a needle.
Participants had 1 cheek treated with JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® XC injectable gel with a needle.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Mid-Face Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Screening) to Month 1
The evaluating investigator (EI) assessed the participant's overall mid-face volume deficit for each cheek using a 6-point photonumeric scale, where: 0=None (moon face; fullness) [best] to 5=Severe (wasting) [worst]. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline (Screening) to Month 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-Point Improvement (Decrease From Baseline) in MFVDS Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Screening) to Month 1
The EI assessed the participant's overall mid-face volume deficit for each cheek using a 6-point photonumeric scale, where: 0=None (moon face; fullness) [best] to 5=Severe (wasting) [worst]. The percentage of participants who showed ≥1-point improvement (decrease in severity) from Baseline is reported.
Baseline (Screening) to Month 1
Change From Baseline in FACE-Q Satisfaction With Cheeks Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Screening) to Month 1
The participant completed the 5-item Satisfaction with Cheeks module of the FACE-Q questionnaire that evaluated various aspects of the cheeks including symmetry, smoothness, attractiveness, contour, and fullness using a 4-point scale where: 1=very dissatisfied to 4=very satisfied. The total score was transformed to a 0 to 100 point scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. The FACE-Q Satisfaction with Cheeks outcome was assessed by the participant overall and not by each cheek.
Baseline (Screening) to Month 1
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE is defined as an AE that initially occurred or increased in severity on or after the treatment start date.
Up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 29, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 2, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Age-related Volume Deficit in the Mid-face

Clinical Trials on JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® XC injectable gel with cannula

Subscribe