Psychosocial Pain Management to Improve Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Outcomes (Persist)

June 18, 2025 updated by: Mark A. Ilgen, University of Michigan

Psychosocial Pain Management to Improve Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this research study is to look at the effect of programs aimed at helping people manage chronic pain and medication treatment. The program sessions focus on educational information and strategies for pain and medication management. The researchers enroll people who have chronic pain and have recently begun buprenorphine treatment to see if participants could benefit from these programs. This research study will help the researchers learn how to improve current therapies for pain and medication management.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Michigan Medicine
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48105
        • Veterans Affair Ann Arbor Healthcare System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • having a diagnosis of an opioid use disorders (OUD) within the past 12 months;
  • started buprenorphine (the term we use to refer to all buprenorphine products including buprenorphine/naloxone) treatment within the past 6 months
  • at least moderate or greater self-reported pain on average over the past 3 months;
  • regular and consistent access to a telephone and willingness to use the phone for study sessions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • buprenorphine medication prescribed in the form of a monthly injection and/or a transdermal patch
  • self-reported pregnancy at the time of study enrollment
  • currently living outside of the United States

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI)
Eight Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-based individual telephone or video therapy sessions with research study therapist.
Behavioral: Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI)
The main theme of the treatment is to provide participants with new ways of thinking and coping skills related to managing pain and opioid use in order to increase the likelihood the participant may remain in buprenorphine treatment.
Active Comparator: Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)
Two individual telephone educational sessions with research study therapist.
Behavioral: Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)
The EUC condition is designed to match the PPMI condition in terms of the non-specific aspects of receiving support for pain, substance use, and receiving monitoring of buprenorphine adherence.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retention on Buprenorphine Treatment According to TimeLine Follow-Back - 3-months
Time Frame: 3-months post enrollment
In this study, "retention on buprenorphine treatment" was defined as the time until a participant stopped taking their medication for 7 or more days in a row. This information was collected using a calendar recall method, the TimeLine Follow-Back (TLFB) measure at 3 months. The average number of days participants remained on buprenorphine before this happened was calculated, using the data collected at 3-month follow-up.
3-months post enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retention on Buprenorphine Treatment According to TimeLine Follow-Back - 12 Months
Time Frame: 12-months post enrollment
In this study, "retention on buprenorphine treatment" was defined as the time until a participant stopped taking their medication for 7 or more days in a row. This information was collected using a calendar recall method, the TimeLine Follow-Back (TLFB) measure at 12 months. The average number of days participants remained on buprenorphine before this happened was calculated, using the data collected at 12-month follow-up.
12-months post enrollment
Average Change in Self-reported Level of Pain Intensity on the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity (NRS-I) at 3-month Follow up (Compared to Baseline)
Time Frame: 3-months post enrollment
Pain level will be measured using the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity (NRS-I), an 11-point numeric rating scale (0=no pain, 10= worst pain imaginable), which will be collected at the baseline enrollment assessment and 3-month follow-up. To calculate our measure, we subtracted each participant's score at 3-month assessment and subtracted it from their baseline score. We then averaged calculated average change in scores for each intervention group.
3-months post enrollment
Average Change in Self-Reported Level of Pain Related Functioning on the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI) at 3-month Follow up (Compared to Baseline)
Time Frame: 3-months post enrollment
Pain-related functioning will be measured using the pain interference subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI), an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 = no pain/does not interfere, 10 = worst pain imaginable/completely interferes). For this study, an increase in pain-related functioning will be measured as a reduction in the pain interference scale scores over time. The BPI interference subscale measures how much pain has interfered with seven daily activities and will provide a current level of pain-related functioning (past 24-hours) at the 3-month follow-up. BPI pain interference will be calculated as the mean of the seven interference items. For each follow-up time point, the baseline value will be subtracted to obtain a change score.
3-months post enrollment
Percent Days Abstinent From Substance Use on the TimeLine Follow-Back - 3-months
Time Frame: 3-months post enrollment
Frequency of substance use will be measured using the TimeLine Follow-Back and will be collected at 3-month follow-up. During the administration, the participant will be asked to recall their alcohol and drug use utilizing a calendar-assisted structured interview that provides the participant with temporal cues to increase the accuracy of recall. At each follow-up, data will be collected for the entire period since the previous date of data collection. Percent days abstinent from substances (e.g. alcohol and drugs) will be used as the primary measure of substance use. Values shown are the treatment group average percent of days that participants were abstinent from substances after 3 months follow-up.
3-months post enrollment
Average Change in Self-reported Level of Pain Intensity on the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity (NRS-I) at 12-month Follow up (Compared to Baseline)
Time Frame: 12-months post enrollment
Pain level will be measured using the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity (NRS-I), an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable), which will be collected at the baseline enrollment assessment and the 12-month follow-up. For each follow-up time point, the baseline value will be subtracted to obtain a change score.
12-months post enrollment
Average Change in Self-Reported Level of Pain Related Functioning on the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI) at 12-month Follow up (Compared to Baseline)
Time Frame: 12-months post enrollment
Pain-related functioning will be measured using the pain interference subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI), an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 = no pain/does not interfere, 10 = worst pain imaginable/completely interferes). For this study, an increase in pain-related functioning will be measured as a reduction in the pain interference scale scores over time. The BPI interference subscale measures how much pain has interfered with seven daily activities and will provide a current level of pain-related functioning (past 24-hours) at the 12-month follow-up. BPI pain interference will be calculated as the mean of the seven interference items. For each follow-up time point, the baseline value will be subtracted to obtain a change score.
12-months post enrollment
Percent Days Abstinent From Substance Use on the TimeLine Follow-Back - 12 Months
Time Frame: 12-months post enrollment
Frequency of substance use will be measured using the TimeLine Follow-Back and will be collected at the 12-month follow-up. During the administration, the participant will be asked to recall their alcohol and drug use utilizing a calendar-assisted structured interview that provides the participant with temporal cues to increase the accuracy of recall. At each follow-up, data will be collected for the entire period since the previous date of data collection. Percent days abstinent from substances (e.g. alcohol and drugs) will be used as the primary measure of substance use. Values shown are the treatment group average percent of days that participants were abstinent from substances after 12 months follow-up.
12-months post enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Michigan

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
US Department of Veterans Affairs
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Allison Lin, M.D., M.S., University of Michigan
  • Principal Investigator: Mark Ilgen, Ph.D., University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 14, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 23, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 19, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 18, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HUM00166747
  • R33AT010106 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • R01AT010797 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings