Single Crown Supported by Short Implant Versus Standard Implant in Conjunction With Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation.
Single Crown Supported by Short Implant Versus Standard Implant in Conjunction With Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation in the Posterior: a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The primary objective of the present study is to test the H0 hypothesis of:
- No differences in survival of suprastructures and implants with the two treatment modalities.
- No differences in peri-implant MBL, PES, WES, and patient satisfaction using VAS with the two treat modalities.
- No differences in oral health related quality of life using OHIP-14 with the two treatment modalities.
The secondary objective will include:
1. Complications related to bone harvesting, implant installation, and MSFA.
The primary outcome measures included:
- Survival of suprastructures.
- Survival of implants.
- Radiographic peri-implant MBL.
- Professional evaluation of suprastructure and soft tissue using PES and WES.
- Patient satisfaction using VAS
- Oral health related quality of life using OHIP-14 questionnaire.
Secondary outcome measures:
• Pre- and postoperative complications.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- >20 years
- Partial edentulism in the posterior maxilla.
- Height and weight of the maxillary alveolar process of at least 5.5 mm.
- Mandibular occluding teeth.
Exclusion Criteria:
- General contraindications to implant therapy.
- Poor oral hygiene.
- Progressive periodontitis.
- Acute infection in the area intended for implant placement.
- Parafunction, bruxism, or clenching.
- Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
- Heavy tobacco use, define as >10 cigarettes per day.
- Pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Short implant
Short implant 6 mm installed
|
40 patients will be randomly allocated to short implants (group 1) and standard implants in conjunction with MSFA using 50% particulated autogenous mandibular bone graft mixed with 50% Bio-Oss (group 2).
|
|
Other: Conventional implant + bone augmentation
Standard length implant 13 mm in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation serves as a control group
|
40 patients will be randomly allocated to short implants (group 1) and standard implants in conjunction with MSFA using 50% particulated autogenous mandibular bone graft mixed with 50% Bio-Oss (group 2).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Survival of suprastructures.
Time Frame: 1-year follow up
|
Survival of suprastructures is defined as absence of mechanical/or biological complications causing loss of suprastructures.
Chipping of ceramics and loosening of the suprastructure were not categorized as loss of suprastructure.
|
1-year follow up
|
|
Survival of implants.
Time Frame: 1-year follow up
|
Survival of implants is defined as clinically stable and osseointegrated implants with absence of mobility, progressive marginal bone loss, and infection.
|
1-year follow up
|
|
Radiographic MBL.
Time Frame: 1-year follow up
|
Measurement of marginal bone level in millimeter.
|
1-year follow up
|
|
Professional evaluation of the prosthetic restoration and soft tissue using pink esthetic score (PES) and white esthetic score (WES).
Time Frame: 1-year follow up
|
Esthetic evaluation of suprastructure and soft tissue using PES and WES.
PES includes 7 different variables: mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft-tissue level, soft-tissue contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft-tissue colour, and texture.
Each variable is assessed with a 0, 1, or 2 score, with 0 being the poorest score and 2 the best according to the degree of match or mismatch compared with the anterior premolar or molar.
The highest possible PES is 14.
WES includes 5 different variables: Crown form, volume, colour, translucency, and texture.
Each variable is assessed with a 0, 1, or 2 score, with 0 being the poorest score and 2 the best according to the degree of match or mismatch compared with the anterior premolar or molar.
The highest possible WES is 10.
|
1-year follow up
|
|
Patient satisfaction.
Time Frame: 1-year follow up
|
Evaluation of patient satisfaction using visual analogue scale (VAS).
VAS with 0 indicating extreme dissatisfaction and 10 indicating complete satisfaction.
|
1-year follow up
|
|
Oral health related quality of life as defined by oral health impact profile (OHIP-14).
Time Frame: 1-year follow up
|
Evaluation of oral health related quality of life using OHIP-14 questionnaire.
OHIP-14 scale ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating poorer oral health impact profile.
|
1-year follow up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Complications.
Time Frame: 1-year follow up
|
Evaluation of biological and mechanical complication rate.
|
1-year follow up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- N-20160047
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.