Impact of Continuous Regional Analgesia in Severe Trauma Patients (ALRréa)

September 4, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Evaluation of the Interest of Regional Locoregional Anesthesia by Perfusion Blocks in Continuous Infusion in Polytrauma Patients With Limb Fractures and Mechanical Ventilation. A Prospective Randomized Study

Regional analgesia, based on its physiological effects and efficacy, is used for optimal perioperative pain relief. However, for acute pain in multiple trauma patients in a critical condition, it has not been prospectively studied. The use of regional anaesthesia in this group of patients extend to the management of trauma patients and of other painful procedures performed at the patient's bed. The use of RA in such patients must be analyzed in the light of associated conditions that can increase the risk of systemic toxicity and complications: coagulopathies, infection, immunosuppressive states, sedation and problems associated with mechanical ventilation. The investigators aim to assess the role of continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNB) in multiple trauma patients, in order to show the benefits in terms of opiates consumption decrease, sedation limitation, improvement in ventilator free days and patients outcome

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Inclusion of multiple trauma patients with limb fractures and need for sedation and prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Patients should meet the following criterias: pressure of cerebral perfusion>60mmHg, normothermia, PaCO2 35-40 mmHg, pH> 7.20, Normal coagulation parameters, Hb> 8g / dl (without head trauma) or Hb> 10g / dl (if associated head trauma).

Randomization in two patients groups: "RA group" versus "NoRA Group

Methods:

group without locoregional anesthesia: Sedation using midazolam and sufentanil: Multi-Daily adjustment of doses every 4 hours using Behavioral Pain Scale score <4 and Ramsay Score > 4.

group with locoregional anesthesia: Sedation using midazolam and sufentanil: Multi-Daily adjustment of doses every 4 hours using Behavioral Pain Scale score <4 and Ramsay Score > 4 + peronerval block catheter from 0 to 24h after admission in intensive care unit using ropivacaine 0.2% with a continuous infusion at 1mL/10 Kg /H Follow-up up to 5 days for the 2 group. The main objective: sufentanil consumption (reported in µg / kg / d) for the same levels of Behavioral Pain Scale and Ramsay Scales values.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient older than 18 years
  • Multiple trauma Patient ( with or without head trauma)
  • Patient admitted to ICU
  • Patient with limb fracture (s)
  • Patient requiring sedation and mechanical ventilation for more than 48h
  • Patient affiliated to a social security system
  • Patient whose informed consent was obtained from the family

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient currently enrolled in another trial
  • Patient with coagulation disorders
  • Patient whose access to the puncture sites is not feasible (underlying lesions)
  • Patient with allergies to local anesthetics (LA)
  • Patient whose family did not give informed consent
  • Patient younger than 15 years and 3 months
  • Tetraplegic Patient
  • Dying patients
  • Patients with more than 3 different fracture sites

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Continuous Regional Analgesia group
Sedation using midazolam and sufentanil: Multi-Daily adjustment of doses every 4 hours using Behavioral Pain Scale score <4 and Ramsay Score > 4 + perinerval block catheter from 0 to 24h after admission in intensive care unit using ropivacaine 0.2% with a continuous infusion at 1mL/10 Kg /H
General anaesthesia without regional analgesia
Experimental: Control Group
group with general anesthesia and without locoregional anesthesia: Sedation using midazolam and sufentanil: Multi-Daily adjustment of doses every 4 hours using Behavioral Pain Scale score <4 and Ramsay Score > 4

Aseptic placement of one or two tunnelized CPNB at the level of the nerves or plexus of the traumatized limb (s), Nervestimulation and ultrasound guidance by trained operator.

Continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 1mL/10 Kg /H

+ General anaesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
sufentanil consumption in ICU patients for sedation
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
assess the interest of regional anesthesia in trauma patients with fractures members. sufentanil consumption in ICU patients for sedation (µg/kg/j)
up to 48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
daily consumption of sufentanil
Time Frame: at 24 Hours
daily consumption of sufentanil (mcg/kg/j)
at 24 Hours
daily consumption of sufentanil
Time Frame: 48 Hours
daily consumption of sufentanil (mcg/kg/j)
48 Hours
daily consumption of sufentanil
Time Frame: at 72 Hours
daily consumption of sufentanil (mcg/kg/j)
at 72 Hours
daily consumption of sufentanil
Time Frame: at 96 Hours
daily consumption of sufentanil (mcg/kg/j)
at 96 Hours
daily consumption of sufentanil
Time Frame: at 120 Hours
daily consumption of sufentanil (mcg/kg/j)
at 120 Hours
daily consumption of midazolam
Time Frame: at 24 Hours
daily consumption of midazolam (mg/kg/j)
at 24 Hours
daily consumption of midazolam
Time Frame: at 48 Hours
daily consumption of midazolam (mg/kg/j)
at 48 Hours
daily consumption of midazolam
Time Frame: at 72 Hours
daily consumption of midazolam (mg/kg/j)
at 72 Hours
daily consumption of midazolam
Time Frame: at 96 Hours
daily consumption of midazolam (mg/kg/j)
at 96 Hours
daily consumption of midazolam
Time Frame: at 120 Hours
daily consumption of midazolam (mg/kg/j)
at 120 Hours
daily consumption of noradreline
Time Frame: at 24 Hours
daily consumption of noradreline (mg/kg/j)
at 24 Hours
daily consumption of noradreline
Time Frame: at 48 Hours
daily consumption of noradreline (mg/kg/j)
at 48 Hours
daily consumption of noradreline
Time Frame: at 72 Hours
daily consumption of noradreline (mg/kg/j)
at 72 Hours
daily consumption of noradreline
Time Frame: at 96 Hours
daily consumption of noradreline (mg/kg/j)
at 96 Hours
daily consumption of noradreline
Time Frame: at 120 Hours
daily consumption of noradreline (mg/kg/j)
at 120 Hours
sedation duration
Time Frame: discharge, up to end of hospitalization (Follow-up up to 5 days)
number of days between inclusion and the end of hospitalization
discharge, up to end of hospitalization (Follow-up up to 5 days)
ventilator free days
Time Frame: discharge, up to end of hospitalization (Follow-up up to 5 days)
number of days between inclusion and the end of hospitalization
discharge, up to end of hospitalization (Follow-up up to 5 days)
duration of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: discharge, up to end of hospitalization (Follow-up up to 5 days)
number of days between inclusion and the end of hospitalization
discharge, up to end of hospitalization (Follow-up up to 5 days)
Mechanical ventilation complication
Time Frame: From the third to the tenth day after inclusion
the rate of occurrence of pneumopathy acquired under mechanical ventilation (between 3rd and 10th day of developmen
From the third to the tenth day after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Oriane MARTINEZ, MD, Department of Anesthesia Resuscitation at the Hospital Lapeyronie

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 8822 (Other Identifier: CTEP)
  • 2010-A00443-36 (Other Identifier: ID RCB)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Limb Fracture

Clinical Trials on Control Group

Search Similar Trials