Insulin Glargine U300 vs Insulin Degludec U100 in Impact on the Glycaemic and Cardiovascular Factors
The Differences Between Insulin Glargine U300 and Insulin Degludec U100 in Impact on the Glycaemic Variability, Oxidative Stress, Arterial Stiffness and the Lipid Profiles in Insulin naïve Patients Suffering From Type Two Diabetes Mellitus
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Split, Croatia, 21000
- Klinički Bolnički Centar Split
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- a history of DMT2 for at least 1 year
- aged between 18 and 65 years (women obligatory postmenopausal)
- uncontrolled glycaemia on two or more oral antidiabetic drugs
- no prior use of insulin
- HbA1c ≥7.5%
- receiving statins (if not on statins, they were put on it)
- not on antiaggregant therapy (if on antiaggregants, they were temporarily excluded from therapy)
Exclusion criteria:
- the presence of malignant disease
- chronic liver disease
- renal impairment with creatinine clearance < 60 ml/s
- severe cardiovascular disease or history of cardiovascular incidents (stroke, myocardial infarction, peripheral amputation)
- rheumatic and autoimmune diseases and the usage of glitazones or anticoagulant therapy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: degludec arm
25 patients were discontinued their previous therapy and given metformin alone (2 g/day) for seven days.
After seven days they were randomized to first receive IDeg-100 In phase one they received IDeg-100 and metformin for 12 weeks.
Phase one was followed by a second wash-up period in which patients received metformin alone again for seven days.
In phase two, which also lasted for 12 weeks, patients were switched from IDeg-100 to IGlar-300 (and metformin was continued).
The initial dose of both insulins was 0.2 IU/kg.
|
treatment of DM and it's affect on Glycaemic Variability, Oxidative Stress, Arterial Stiffness and the Lipid Profiles
|
|
Active Comparator: glargine arm
25 patients were discontinued their previous therapy and given metformin alone (2 g/day) for seven days.
After seven days they were randomized to first receive IGlar-300 In phase one they received IGlar-300 and metformin for 12 weeks.
Phase one was followed by a second wash-up period in which patients received metformin alone again for seven days.
In phase two, which also lasted for 12 weeks, patients were switched from IGlar-300 to IDeg-100 (and metformin was continued).
The initial dose of both insulins was 0.2 IU/kg.
|
treatment of DM and it's affect on Glycaemic Variability, Oxidative Stress, Arterial Stiffness and the Lipid Profiles
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes from baseline in glucose variability
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Glucose variability will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase using 3-day 7-point SMBG and calculating coefficient of variation in % out of SMBG recordings
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline in oxidative stress
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Oxidative stress will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by measuring thiol groups and hydroperoxides (d-ROM) in serum
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline in arterial stiffness after treatment
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Oxidative stress will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by measuring augmentation index with SphygmoCor.
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes from baseline in total cholesterol
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Total cholesterol concentration in mmol/L will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline in triglycerides
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Triglyceride concentration in mmol/L will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline in LDL
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in mmol/L will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline in HDL
Time Frame: 3 months
|
High density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in mmol/L will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline in WBC
Time Frame: 3 months
|
White blood count will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline in RBC
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Red blood count will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline in platelets
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Platelets count will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline in hemoglobin
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Hemoglobin concentration in g/L will be assessed in at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline in hematocrit
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Hematocrit in L/L will be assessed in at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline in MCV
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Medium cellular volume in fL will be assessed in at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline in liver enzymes
Time Frame: 3 months
|
ALT, AST and GGT concentration in U/L will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline in LDH
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Lactate dehydrogenase concentration in U/L will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline in ALP
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Alkaline phosphatase concentration in U/L will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline in CRP
Time Frame: 3 months
|
C-reactive protein concentration in mg/L will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Monnier L, Colette C. Glycemic variability: should we and can we prevent it? Diabetes Care. 2008 Feb;31 Suppl 2:S150-4. doi: 10.2337/dc08-s241.
- Monnier L, Colette C, Owens DR. Glycemic variability: the third component of the dysglycemia in diabetes. Is it important? How to measure it? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 Nov;2(6):1094-100. doi: 10.1177/193229680800200618.
- Ceriello A, Esposito K, Piconi L, Ihnat MA, Thorpe JE, Testa R, Boemi M, Giugliano D. Oscillating glucose is more deleterious to endothelial function and oxidative stress than mean glucose in normal and type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. 2008 May;57(5):1349-54. doi: 10.2337/db08-0063. Epub 2008 Feb 25.
- Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, Hadden D, Turner RC, Holman RR. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000 Aug 12;321(7258):405-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405.
- Monnier L, Mas E, Ginet C, Michel F, Villon L, Cristol JP, Colette C. Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2006 Apr 12;295(14):1681-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.14.1681.
- Eckel RH, Wassef M, Chait A, Sobel B, Barrett E, King G, Lopes-Virella M, Reusch J, Ruderman N, Steiner G, Vlassara H. Prevention Conference VI: Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: Writing Group II: pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in diabetes. Circulation. 2002 May 7;105(18):e138-43. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000013954.65303.c5. No abstract available.
- Patoulias D, Papadopoulos C, Stavropoulos K, Zografou I, Doumas M, Karagiannis A. Prognostic value of arterial stiffness measurements in cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and its complications: The potential role of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020 Apr;22(4):562-571. doi: 10.1111/jch.13831. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
- Vukovic J, Modun D, Budimir D, Sutlovic D, Salamunic I, Zaja I, Boban M. Acute, food-induced moderate elevation of plasma uric acid protects against hyperoxia-induced oxidative stress and increase in arterial stiffness in healthy humans. Atherosclerosis. 2009 Nov;207(1):255-60. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.04.012. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
- Tamminen MK, Westerbacka J, Vehkavaara S, Yki-Jarvinen H. Insulin therapy improves insulin actions on glucose metabolism and aortic wave reflection in type 2 diabetic patients. Eur J Clin Invest. 2003 Oct;33(10):855-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2003.01220.x.
- Gordin D, Saraheimo M, Tuomikangas J, Soro-Paavonen A, Forsblom C, Paavonen K, Steckel-Hamann B, Harjutsalo V, Nicolaou L, Pavo I, Koivisto V, Groop PH. Insulin exposure mitigates the increase of arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria: an exploratory analysis. Acta Diabetol. 2019 Nov;56(11):1169-1175. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01351-4. Epub 2019 May 22.
- Aslan I, Kucuksayan E, Aslan M. Effect of insulin analog initiation therapy on LDL/HDL subfraction profile and HDL associated enzymes in type 2 diabetic patients. Lipids Health Dis. 2013 Apr 24;12:54. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-12-54.
- Home P, Bartley P, Russell-Jones D, Hanaire-Broutin H, Heeg JE, Abrams P, Landin-Olsson M, Hylleberg B, Lang H, Draeger E; Study to Evaluate the Administration of Detemir Insulin Efficacy, Safety and Suitability (STEADINESS) Study Group. Insulin detemir offers improved glycemic control compared with NPH insulin in people with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2004 May;27(5):1081-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1081.
- Heise T, Mathieu C. Impact of the mode of protraction of basal insulin therapies on their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and resulting clinical outcomes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Jan;19(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/dom.12782. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
- Tibaldi J, Hadley-Brown M, Liebl A, Haldrup S, Sandberg V, Wolden ML, Rodbard HW. A comparative effectiveness study of degludec and insulin glargine 300 U/mL in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Apr;21(4):1001-1009. doi: 10.1111/dom.13616. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
- Rosenstock J, Cheng A, Ritzel R, Bosnyak Z, Devisme C, Cali AMG, Sieber J, Stella P, Wang X, Frias JP, Roussel R, Bolli GB. More Similarities Than Differences Testing Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL Versus Insulin Degludec 100 Units/mL in Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes: The Randomized Head-to-Head BRIGHT Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018 Oct;41(10):2147-2154. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0559. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
- Vrebalov Cindro P, Krnic M, Modun D, Vukovic J, Ticinovic Kurir T, Kardum G, Rusic D, Seselja Perisin A, Bukic J. Comparison of the Impact of Insulin Degludec U100 and Insulin Glargine U300 on Glycemic Variability and Oxidative Stress in Insulin-Naive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Pilot Study for a Randomized Trial. JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 8;6(7):e35655. doi: 10.2196/35655.
- Cindro PV, Krnic M, Modun D, Smajic B, Vukovic J. The differences between insulin glargine U300 and insulin degludec U100 in impact on the glycaemic variability, arterial stiffness and the lipid profiles in insulin naive patients suffering from type two diabetes mellitus - outcomes from cross-over open-label randomized trial. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00746-1.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 500-03/16-01/49
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.