A Study to Assess Metabolic Bone Disease of Prematurity Using an Acoustic Method

April 22, 2025 updated by: Azra Alizad, Mayo Clinic

Assessment of Metabolic Bone Disease of Prematurity Using an Acoustic Method

The goal of this project is to develop a new noninvasive ultrasound based technique, called vibro-acoustic analysis (VAA), for evaluation of infant bone health with particular application in assessment of bone health in premature infants who are at risk for bone disease.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

With increased survival of very low birth weight and premature infants over recent decades, bone assessment has become especially vital with the recognition of metabolic bone disease (MBD) of prematurity. Bone assessment became especially vital during last decades with the growing emphasis on metabolic bone disease of prematurity and low-birth-weight infants. Statistics shows that up to 50% of low birth weight and preterm newborns are likely to develop metabolic bone disease. Currently, no screening test has been shown to provide both sensitive and specific evidence of developing MBD over the first several weeks of life in the premature infants. Therefore, there is a need for a non-invasive tool for evaluation of infant bone health. This study will be conducted on premature infants at risk for MBD at multiple time points during their growth, with full term infants as controls. vibro-acoustic analysis (VAA) measurements will be done on the tibia. VAA measurements for the premature infants will be compared to those of full term infants. Performance of VAA in identifying osteopenia and its ability to monitor the response to treatment will be evaluated. The investigators will use an ultrasound system that has been used in the pilot study and employ a transducer with a smaller footprint for pediatric application.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
37

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

3 days to 8 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Full term newborns, approximately equal number of male and female newborn, age <28 days.
  • Preterm infants, approximately equal number of male and female preterm infants with gestational age at birth <37 weeks or birth weight <1500 grams.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants currently requiring continuous cardiovascular medication infusions, including but not limited to, dopamine, epinephrine, milrinone, and dobutamine (may have received these medications in the past.
  • Infants with major congenital anomalies that may affect bone health or structure.
  • For full term infants, infants with a history of intrauterine growth restriction or who are small for gestational age (<10th percentile for weight) at birth.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: premature infants and full term infants

The study visits will be at ≥3 time points at ages: within the first 28 days after birth, 2 months, 3 months, and, if still hospitalized, at 4 months and at 6 months.

  • The ultrasound machine to the nursery or neonatal intensive care unit at a scheduled time.
  • The appropriate ultrasound probe will be placed on the infant's tibia and a miniature hydrophone near the probe. A series of ultrasound measurements will be obtained and the ultrasound data will be saved for offline processing.
  • The Investigators will repeat the measurement in 3 locations of the infant's tibia.
  • Each ultrasound measurement takes a few seconds. The complete ultrasound study will take about 15 minutes at each visit.
  • All procedures will be conducted in the nursery or neonatal intensive care unit to ensure infant safety.
  • The ultrasound measurement for full-term infants can be done in ultrasound lab.
Diagnostic test: Vibro-acoustic analysis (VAA), based on ultrasound radiation force
The study will develop and validate a new ultrasonic method for assessment of infant bone by evaluating structural and mechanical characteristics of the infant tibia. This project will utilize a novel, non-invasive method, vibro-acoustic analysis (VAA), to evaluate infant bone properties in a wide frequency range while reducing the artifacts from soft tissue.
Other Names:
  • ultrasound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ultrasound Transducer Compatibility
Time Frame: 1 year
Successful acquisition and integration of a pediatric transducer with a footprint ≤ X cm² and focal depth ≤ Y mm (to be defined based on commercial availability and anatomical feasibility).
1 year
Hydrophone Sensitivity and Size
Time Frame: 1 year
Selection and validation of a miniature hydrophone (e.g., diameter ≤ Z mm) with high sensitivity, characterized by its frequency response and minimum detectable pressure level.
1 year
Bandwidth Assessment
Time Frame: 1 year
Measurement of hydrophone bandwidth (in MHz) as a primary indicator of sensitivity and signal capture quality.
1 year
System Performance Metrics
Time Frame: 1 year
Quantitative assessment of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and resolution improvements compared to the previous setup using standard adult-sized components.
1 year
Feasibility in Preclinical Models
Time Frame: 1 year
Demonstration of the optimized VAA system's ability to produce high-resolution, reproducible images in a neonatal bone phantom or relevant preclinical model.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantitative Bone Health Index (BHI)
Time Frame: through the study completion, up to 3 years
Derived from vibro-acoustic assessment (VAA) of the tibia in both term and preterm infants, BHI will be compared across age-adjusted groups to determine baseline differences between preterm and term infants.
through the study completion, up to 3 years
VAA Sensitivity to Gestational Age
Time Frame: through the study completion, up to 3 years
Correlation of VAA-derived parameters with gestational age at birth to assess the method's sensitivity in detecting bone development differences attributable to prematurity.
through the study completion, up to 3 years
Longitudinal Changes in VAA Measurements
Time Frame: through the study completion, up to 3 years
Assessment of VAA parameter changes over serial visits in preterm infants undergoing standard nutritional or medical interventions. Evaluates VAA's ability to detect improvements or deteriorations in bone status over time.
through the study completion, up to 3 years
Comparison with Clinical Markers (if available)
Time Frame: through the study completion, up to 3 years
Cross-validation of VAA findings with available clinical or biochemical markers of bone health (e.g., serum calcium, phosphate, ALP levels) to evaluate concurrent validity.
through the study completion, up to 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mayo Clinic

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Azra Alizad, MD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 2, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 22, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 19-001498
  • 1R21AR075370-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 5R21AR075370-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings