Prevalence of Oral Side Effects Associated With Chemo and Radiotherapy for Treating Head and Neck Cancer

February 11, 2023 updated by: Dalia Mohamed abo el -fadel, Cairo University

Prevalence of Oral Side Effects Associated With Chemo and Radiotherapy for Treating Head and Neck Cancer: a Cross-sectional Study

A cross-sectional study will be conducted to report oral complications during chemo and radiotherapy treatment in case of patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer and the effect of theses oral side effects on patients' quality of life which will in turn allow the implication of preventive measures

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

the primary out come of this study is to report oral side effects associated with chemo and radiotherapy used for treating head and neck cancer .patient will be enrolled and data will be collected from the national institute of cancer in Egypt. this will be done through filling the modified ( Edmonton Symptom Assessment System) ESAS questionnaire used to asses different oral side effects in cancer patients. history taking and Clinical examination will be done for each patient enrolled in the study after obtaining their consent form by the main investigator. each and every oral manifestations will be measured by a specific scale . the secondary outcome is identified as the assessment of the effect of oral complications on patients' quality of life which will be determined through completing UW-QOL(University of Washington-Quality Of Life) questionnaire version 4.during the study, patient , treatment and tumor variable will be considered and documented .Data collected form the patient and or from medical records will be saved and tabulated on computer for back up and finally statistically analyzed. A power analysis was designed to have adequate power to apply a statistical test of the research question regarding the degree to which oral adverse events can prevail among patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy. According to the results of Minhas, Sadia, et al. -in which prevalence of oral adverse events was (92.6%)- and by adopting a confidence interval of (95%), a margin of error of (3%) with finite population correction; the predicted sample size (n) was a total of (292) cases. Sample size calculation was performed using Epi info for windows version 7.2

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
294

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt
        • National Institute of Cancer in Egypt

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

patients who are diagnosed with head and neck cancer and started their chemo and radiotherapy treatment

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients after the first week of their treatment till the end of their treatment protocol and at their follow-up visits
  • patients who completed ESAS questioner
  • Male and female patients from 20 -70 years old who are diagnosed with head and neck cancer.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who didn't start their treatment before the examination
  • Patients who refuse to participate in the study.
  • Patients with leukemia or blood cell cancers, infants and children

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
by ESAS questionnaire ,clinical examination of the patient
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
questionnaire is answered by the patient
through study completion, an average of 1 year
oral mucositis assessed by WHO(world Health Organization) scale, clinical examination
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
grade(A)none , (I)mild ,(II)moderate (III)severe and( life threatening (B) 1 asymptomatic or mild pain,2moderate,3 severe,4 life threatening
through study completion, an average of 1 year
xerostomia by CODs (Clinical oral dryness scale)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
questionnaire completed with added clinical examination scored from 1-3indicate mild dryness then 4-6 moderate dryness and 8-10 severe dryness
through study completion, an average of 1 year
dysphagia by VHNSS Version 2.0 (Vanderbilt Head and Neck Cancer Symptom Survey)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
assess the severity of dysphagia by a questionnaire related to struggle during swallowing ,xerostomia, nutrition deficiency ,mucous secretion or taste changes ,mucositis and speech affection each scored from 0 (none) to 10 (severe).
through study completion, an average of 1 year
pain assessed by numerical rating scale(NRS)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
from 0 indicating no pain to 10 being worst pain
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
quality of life assessment QOL-Version 4(Washington University Quality Of Life ) questionnaire
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

questionnaire consists of 12 single question domains, these having between 3 and 6 response options that are scaled evenly from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) according to the hierarchy of response.

The domains are pain, appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder, taste, saliva, mood and anxiety
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cairo University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: dalia m abo el fadel, master, dentist at hospital specialized centers

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 2, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 20, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 3, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 14, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 11, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 4221

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings