Comparative Study Between Steroid Plus Anesthetic Block and CRF in Participants With Hip Osteoarthritis

May 23, 2023 updated by: João Luiz Q. Durigan, University of Brasilia

Conventional Radiofrequency of Anterior Sensory Branches in Chronic Hip Pain Due to Hip Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This will be a prospective, multi-center, double-blinded, randomized study designed to compare the efficacy of Conventional Radiofrequency (CRF) and the anesthetic block of the anterior sensory branches to the hip to control pain and improve function related to hip osteoarthritis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Suspended

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This prospective, double-blinded (participant and outcome assessor) clinical trial was designed to investigate the results of the intervention Continuous Radiofrequency (CRF) in the treatment of participants with chronic hip pain secondary to hip osteoarthritis. Participants will be randomized in a 2-arm, parallel groups. The intervention group will be submitted to an anesthetic block of the sensory branches of femoral and obturator nerves to the hip, with 1 ml of 1% lidocaine with 1ml of steroid (Betamethasone Dipropionate 5 mg/ml + Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate 2 mg/ml) for each branch, followed by denervation with CRF (22¬gauge 5¬mm active tip cannula, 10cm in length) with the tip temperature set at 90° C in a single cycle of 90 min. The sham group will be submitted to the same anesthetic block, followed by a simulation of CRF use. The surgeon performing the procedures will only be informed of the randomization after completing the anesthetic block on the participants to avoid bias at its accuracy. Participants will be evaluated at four follow-up: before intervention and after 1, 12, and 24 weeks, to access the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities score (WOMAC) as the primary outcome.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
36

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Distrito Federal
      • Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil, 70673-900
        • Hospital das Forças Armadas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants 18 years or older
  • Symptomatic unilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA)
  • Pain for more than 6 months in the groin, anterior, anterolateral ou lateral region
  • OA radiologically classified as Kellgren and Lawrence Tipo II-IV,
  • VAS ≥ 4
  • Considered non-responder to conservative treatment for the participant for 6 months.
  • In case of difficulty in selecting participants with symptomatic unilateral OA, symptomatic bilateral hip OA will be admitted and submitted to the same treatment on both sides, after notification and approval from the Ethic Board of each institution involved.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with radiculopathy ipsolateral
  • Knee OA ipsolateral,
  • Previous hip arthroplasty
  • Pain exclusively in the posterior region of the hip
  • Infiltration of the hip for less than 3 months
  • Neurological disease compromising gait
  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Psychiatric disease that compromise collaboration with the protocol
  • Implanted pacemaker
  • Prothrombin Activity Time (PT/INR) > 3 and
  • Litigation process related to the disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Conventional Radiofrequency Group
Will be submitted to an anesthetic block of the sensory branches of femoral and obturator nerves to the hip, with 1 ml of 1% lidocaine with 1ml of steroid (Betamethasone Dipropionate 5 mg/ml + Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate 2 mg/ml) for each branch, followed by denervation with CRF (22¬gauge 5¬mm active tip cannula, 10cm in length) with the tip temperature set at 90° C in a single cycle of 90 min.
Procedure: CRF of anterior sensitive branches to the hip
Steroid and anesthetic extra articular injection followed by denervation using CRF at 90 celsius degree during a period 90 minutes at the sensitive branches of obturator and femoral nerve, separately.
Sham Comparator: Anesthetic plus steroid group
The sham group will be submitted to the same anesthetic block as described in the intervention group, followed by a simulation of CRF use.
Procedure: Anesthetic block with steroid injection of anterior sensitive branches to the hip
Corticosteroid and anesthetic extra articular injection at the sensitive branches of obturator and femoral nerve, only

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life (WOMAC)
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 weeks ± 1 week.
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) is a self-administered health status measure and consists of 24 items divided into three domains, which are pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical function (17 questions), validated to patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis, available in a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 96 points.This questionnaire is translated and validated in portuguese.
Baseline to 24 weeks ± 1 week.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
The pain visual analogue scale (VAS) is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, in a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal line, 10 centimeters (100 mm) in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme, "no pain" (score 0) and " worst pain ever" (score 100).
Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
Change in Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a joint-specific measure, and it consists of two sections: questions and a physical examination, including a range of motion and deformity items. The score has a maximum of 100 points with a maximum of 44 points for pain, 47 for function, 4 points for absence of deformity, and 5 points for a range of motion. The highest score of 100 points indicates the best function and no pain.
Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
Pain Medication Intake
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
To evaluate pain medication we will use a scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0= no medication; 0 = no medication; 1= use of dipyrone or paracetamol; 2= use of NSAIDs; 3= use of opiate derivatives; 4= routinely scheduled opiate derivatives), considering the last 48 hours.
Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
Change in Hip muscles Isometric Peak Force
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
To examine isometric muscle force, a Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System Model-01165 (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA) will be used to access Peak Force of hip flexors, abductors, adductors and extensors.
Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
Change in Hip muscles Time to Reach Peak Force
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
To examine isometric muscle force, a Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System Model-01165 (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA) will be used to access Time to Reach Peak Force of hip flexors, abductors, adductors and extensors.
Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
Change in Hip muscles Average Force
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
To examine isometric muscle force, a Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System Model-01165 (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA) will be used to access Average Force of hip flexors, abductors, adductors and extensors. We will also determine intra and inter-rater reliability for isometric force of hip flexors, abductors, adductors and extensors.
Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
Evaluation of intra and inter-rater reliability of Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System Model-01165 in subjects with hip Osteoarthritis.
Time Frame: Baseline
To determine intra and inter-rater reliability of the Hand lend dynamometer Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System Model-01165 (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA) in accessing peak force, time to reach peak force and average force of hip flexors, abductors, adductors and extensors, the first 20 participants included in this study will be evaluated by the principal investigator and outcome assessor at the baseline.
Baseline
Change in Global Satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
To evaluate participant satisfaction, we will use 5 points Likert Scale, ranging from 0 to 4 (0= none _ no good at all, ineffective intervention; 1= poor _ some effect but unsatisfactory; 2= fair _ reasonable effect but could be better; 3= good _ satisfactory effect with occasional episodes of pain or stiffness; 4= excellent _ ideal response, virtually pain-free).
1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Adverse Effects
Time Frame: 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
To examine the incidence of adverse effects, a questionnaire will be apply to investigate the occurrence of: Hematoma, paresthesia, weakness, worsening of pain, worsening of function or any other adverse effect that participants attribute to the procedure performed.
1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Brasilia

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: João Durigan, PhD, Universidade de Brasília

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 31, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 7, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 23, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CAAE: 40347320.1.1001.0025

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings