Global Burden and Treatment Trajectiories in Italian Patients With Fabry Disease (GROUND)

November 22, 2023 updated by: Chiesi Italia

Global Burden and Treatment Trajectiories in Italian Patients With Fabry Disease: a Retrospective, Longitudinal and Cross-sectional Study

GROUND study is an Italian, multicenter retrospective longitudinal cohort study with a cross-sectional phase with the aim to quantify the severe clinical burden in terms of severe and fatal outcomes and extension of clinical impairment in the Italian Fabry Disease patients' population

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Arezzo, Italy
        • AUSL Toscana Sud-Est - Ospedale San Donato
      • Firenze, Italy
        • A.O.U. Careggi
      • Monza, Italy
        • U.O.C. Nefrologia ASST Monza - Ospedale San Gerardo
      • Napoli, Italy
        • U.O. di Nefrologia - Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II" NAPOLI
      • Palermo, Italy
        • A.O.U. Policlinico "Giaccone"
      • Rimini, Italy
        • AUSL della Romagna - Ospedale Infermi
      • Roma, Italy
        • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Gemelli" IRCCS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with a confirmed FD diagnosis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients living or deceased of either sex (age ≥18 years) with a documented FD diagnosis in the last 10 years from the beginning of the study.
  2. Patients with at least 3 years of follow-up or early occurrence of severe/fatal outcomes. Also, adult patients who were lost by their care provider or physician and cannot be traced, but for which it is possible to retrieve data for at least 3 years before the last available follow-up visit or from diagnosis to the occurrence of severe/fatal outcomes if earlier, can be included.
  3. Written informed consent to undergo in the cross-sectional protocol clinical visit and to retrospectively collect genetic/clinical data. In case of deceased or untraceable patients, the written informed consent is not required to collect retrospective clinical data (excluding genetic data).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not applicable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
FD patients
Other: FD patients
Patients with Fabry disease diagnosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of severe and fatal clinical outcomes
Time Frame: Baseline
Occurrence of severe and fatal clinical outcomes derived by event-free survival from birth to last follow-up or cross-sectional visit;
Baseline
Comprehensive burden
Time Frame: Baseline
Comprehensive burden intended as a measure of extension of clinical impairment assessed by median Mainz Severity Score Index (MSSI) at last follow-up or cross-sectional visit.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients with disease progression
Time Frame: From the first available FASTEX score to baseline
Percentage of patients with disease progression measured by FAbry STabilization indEX and defined as a change >20% from the first available FASTEX score to the last follow-up and in the last 2 years until the last follow-up and 2 years before the last follow-up or cross-sectional visit (or when available within 3-1 years before last follow-up)
From the first available FASTEX score to baseline
Percentage of patients with disease activity
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of patients with disease activity assessed by the occurrence rate of clinically significant events from diagnosis to last follow-up or cross-sectional visit.
Baseline
Brief pain inventory score
Time Frame: Baseline
Uses simple numeric rating scales from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain)
Baseline
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality index
Time Frame: Baseline
Seven component scores are derived, each scored 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty). The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
Baseline
Hamilton depression scale
Time Frame: Baseline
It contains 17 items. A score of 0-7 is considered to be normal while a score of 20 or higher (indicating at least moderate severity)
Baseline
HAQ-disability index
Time Frame: Baseline
There are 8 sections: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. There are 2 or 3 questions for each section. Scoring within each section is from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).The 8 scores of the 8 sections are summed and divided by 8.
Baseline
SF-36
Time Frame: Baseline
Covers eight health domains: physical functioning (10 items), bodily pain (2 items), role limitations due to physical health problems (4 items), role limitations due to personal or emotional problems (4 items), emotional well-being (5 items), social functioning (2 items), energy/fatigue (4 items), and general health perceptions (5 items). Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with a higher score defining a more favorable health state.
Baseline
Time from first manifestation to diagnosis
Time Frame: Baseline
Time from first manifestation to diagnosis
Baseline
Patients prescribed to different treatments
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of patients prescribed to different treatment among naïve and switchers groups; determinants of untreated, treated discontinue, treated persisting status.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chiesi Italia

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Antonio Pisani, MD, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II" NAPOLI
  • Principal Investigator: Federico Pieruzzi, MD, Ospedale San Gerardo Monza
  • Principal Investigator: Renzo Mignani, MD, AUSL della Romagna - Ospedale Infermi Rimini
  • Principal Investigator: Elena Verrecchia, MD, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Gemelli" IRCCS ROMA
  • Principal Investigator: Davide Noto, MD, A.O.U. Policlinico "Giaccone" PALERMO
  • Principal Investigator: Antonino Tuttolomondo, MD, A.O.U. Policlinico "Giaccone" PALERMO
  • Principal Investigator: Maurizio Pieroni, MD, AUSL Toscana Sud-Est - Ospedale San Donato AREZZO
  • Principal Investigator: Iacopo Olivotto, MD, A.O.U. Careggi FIRENZE

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 23, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 22, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DFIDM-2001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings