Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for Depressed Patients During the Covid-19 Pandemic

March 22, 2023 updated by: Dr. Robyn Waxman, Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) using intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has been found to be a non inferior protocol to standard rTMS for the treatment of major depressive disorder. An accelerated course is of particular interest given the safety profile of the procedure and the potential to treat people more quickly making the treatment more accessible. This study aims to assess the feasibility and clinical outcomes of a high dose iTBS protocol in patients with depression in the context of unipolar or bipolar II disorder who are waiting for Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or rTMS due to degree of treatment resistance or severity of symptoms. This is a prospective, open-label, interventional pilot study wherein patients who have been diagnosed with major depressive disorder and referred to brain stimulation clinic, will be recruited for the treatment. Patients will be administered eight questionnaires before and after the treatment to assess the change in clinical outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Participants will receive same stimulation protocol, however they will be given 6 times per day instead of once per day. Each Treatment will consist of a single iTBS treatment delivering 600 puses of iTBS (bursts of 3 pulses at 50 Hz, bursts repeated at 5 Hz, with a duy cycle of 2 seconds on, 8 seconds off, over 60 cycles and it takes about 3 minutes at a target of 90 to 120% of the subject's resting motor threshold. Treatment will be given through the device that is usually used, which is Magpro by Magventure, B70 Fluid-Cooled Coil .

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Whitby, Ontario, Canada, M5P 3L9
        • Robyn

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years and older
  • Unipolar Depression or Bipolar II depression based on the MINI - no psychotic features
  • Pass the TMS safety screen on the brain stimulation consultation template Voluntary and Competent to consent to treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a MINI confirmed diagnosis of a substance use disorder within the last month
  • Have a concomitant major unstable medical illness, cardiac pacemaker or implanted mediation pump
  • Have a lifetime MINI diagnosis of bipolar I, or schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, delusional disorder.
  • Have any significant neurological disorder or insult including but not limited to: any condition likely to be associated with increased intracranial pressure, space occupying brain lesion, any history of seizure except those therapeutically induced by ECT, or a febrile seizure of infancy or single seizure related to a known drug related event, cerebral aneurysm, or significant head trauma with loss of consciousness for greater than 5 minutes
  • Have an intracranial implant (e.g. aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head (excluding the mouth) that cannot be safely removed.
  • Currently taking more than lorazepam 2mg daily (or equivalent) or any dose of an anticonvulsant due to the potential to limit rTMS efficacy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Patients receiving accelerated rTMS
Device: Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation) given in an accelerated form
The intervention is used regularly for patients with treatment resistant depression, however, in this trial it will be given multiple times per day and over less days than the usual protocol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Remission of depressive symptoms using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM - D or HDRS) - 17 version
Time Frame: at screening (within a week of starting treatment) to a week post treatment
Severity of depressive symptoms being measured pre and post treatment - remission is less than 8 (low score is less depression, higher score - more depressive symptoms, range is 0 to 53)
at screening (within a week of starting treatment) to a week post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response to treatment with reduction of 50% in depressive symptoms on HAM-D - 17 and PHQ - 9 (patient health questionnaire)
Time Frame: at screening (within a week of starting treatment) to a week post treatment
Change in severity of depressive symptoms (same as primary outcome description)
at screening (within a week of starting treatment) to a week post treatment
Response of anxiety symptoms - reduction by 50% - Generalized Anxiety disorder scale (GAD-&)
Time Frame: at screening (within a week of starting treatment) to a week post treatment
Change in severity of anxiety symptoms - higher the score, more anxiety symptoms, range 0 to 21
at screening (within a week of starting treatment) to a week post treatment
Change in World Health Organization Disability assessment scale (WHODAS)
Time Frame: at screening (within a week of starting treatment) to a week post treatment
severity of disability ( 40 to 180 - higher score = more disabled)
at screening (within a week of starting treatment) to a week post treatment
Change in the Quality of Life, Enjoyment, and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QUAL-ES-Q)
Time Frame: at screening (within a week of starting treatment) to a week post treatment
Change in rated quality of life, score range from 14 to 70 ( higher score = better quality of life)
at screening (within a week of starting treatment) to a week post treatment
Improvement overall using the Clinical Global Severity/Impression Scale (CGI-I)
Time Frame: at screening (within a week of starting treatment) to a week post treatment
Change in severity of illness (1 - much worse, 7 - most improved)
at screening (within a week of starting treatment) to a week post treatment
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) - Response to symptoms
Time Frame: at screening (within a week of starting treatment ) to a week post treatment
reduction in depression score by 50% - higher the score - more depressive symptoms, scored from 0 to 27
at screening (within a week of starting treatment ) to a week post treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse effects of the treatment
Time Frame: during and after each rTMS treatment during acute treatment and up to a week after treatment
Looking at occurrence of adverse effects - screened during/after each treatment
during and after each rTMS treatment during acute treatment and up to a week after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Robyn Waxman, Ontario Shores

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 12, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 22, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 21-008-B

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings