Effect of Designed Physical Training After Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy on Motor Function of Ambulant Children With Spastic Diplegia

December 6, 2022 updated by: Amira Mahmoud Abd-elmonem, Cairo University

A Randomized Controlled Study Investigating the Effect of Designed Physical Training After Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy on Motor Function of Ambulant Children With Spastic Diplegia

The management of cerebral palsy is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Selective dorsal rhizotomy is a neurosurgical technique that aims to reduce spasticity in the lower limbs and improve motor function.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

the current study is designed to assess the effectiveness of Selective dorsal rhizotomy on motor function in ambulant children with spastic diplegia. therefore, A convenient sample of ambulant children with spastic diplegia will be allocated to two groups of equal numbers (control and experimental)

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
42

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Giza, Egypt, 12662
        • Amira Mahmoud Abd-elmonem

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 8 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • CP, spastic diplegia
  • 4-8 years of age
  • The ability to walk with or without assistive devices typically on Level II-III on Gross Motor Function Classification System
  • At least six months after the last Botulinum toxin A injection in the lower extremities
  • Average intelligent quotient according to medical records for active participation
  • Good trunk control with good antigravity strength of lower extremity on clinical examination.

Exclusionary criteria

  • Ankle clonus; exaggerated deep tendon reflex in the legs
  • Babinski sign
  • Structural non-reducible deformities or musculoskeletal surgery in the lower extremities in the past 12 months
  • Moderate to severe signs of dystonia, athetosis or ataxia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: control group
Other: Concomitant physical rehabilitation
Children of this group will receive a regular exercise rehabilitation program including starching exercises, functional strength training and static and dynamic balance exercises.The program will be conducted by six licensed pediatric physical therapists for one hour/session, 3 times/week, and six successive months.
Other: Standard Orthotic Management
A custom-made articulating ankle foot orthosis was prescribed with a hinge at the level of the medial malleolus extends distally to the tip of the toes and proximally on the posterior surface of the leg to about 5 cm below the knee and secured straps. It is fabricated to permit free ankle dorsiflexion and lock the plantar flexion at 0 dorsiflexion. The splinting schedule started gradually for 2 h/day in the first month, 4 h/day in the second month to the entire wake-up time of the day.
Experimental: Experimental group
selective dorsal rhizotomy group
Other: Concomitant physical rehabilitation
Children of this group will receive a regular exercise rehabilitation program including starching exercises, functional strength training and static and dynamic balance exercises.The program will be conducted by six licensed pediatric physical therapists for one hour/session, 3 times/week, and six successive months.
Other: Standard Orthotic Management
A custom-made articulating ankle foot orthosis was prescribed with a hinge at the level of the medial malleolus extends distally to the tip of the toes and proximally on the posterior surface of the leg to about 5 cm below the knee and secured straps. It is fabricated to permit free ankle dorsiflexion and lock the plantar flexion at 0 dorsiflexion. The splinting schedule started gradually for 2 h/day in the first month, 4 h/day in the second month to the entire wake-up time of the day.
Other: selective dorsal rhizotomy
The surgical procedures were tailored to each child according to preoperative assessment plan. All SDRs were performed by a single neurosurgeon through an osteoplastic laminotomy from L2 to L5 that left the facet joints intact.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Balance
Time Frame: after 6 months and after 1 year (follow-up)
The pediatric balance scale was used to assess the child's functional performance with total score is 56 and higher score representing a better performance.
after 6 months and after 1 year (follow-up)
Gross motor function
Time Frame: after 6 months and after 1 year (follow-up)
The gross motor function measure-88 is used to evaluate the motor function with total score is 100 and higher scores representing a better performance.
after 6 months and after 1 year (follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Selective voluntary motor control
Time Frame: after 6 months and after 1 year (follow-up)
Selective motor control of lower extremity scale is used for assessment of motor control of the lower limb joints in children with spastic cerebral palsy with a maximum score of 20 points, 10 points for each limb.
after 6 months and after 1 year (follow-up)
Energy cost of walking
Time Frame: after 6 months and after 1 year (follow-up)
The energy expenditure index (beats/meter) can be calculated as; walking heart rate (beats/min) minus resting heart rate (beats/ min) on walking velocity (meters/min).
after 6 months and after 1 year (follow-up)
Functional capacity
Time Frame: after 6 months and after 1 year (follow-up)
The six-minute walking test is used to assess walking capacity in children with and without disabilities.
after 6 months and after 1 year (follow-up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cairo University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Hazem A Aly, Phd, PhD of physical therapy for pediatrics, faculty of physical therapyCairo university
  • Study Director: Ahmed rabie, Phd, Department of neurosurgery, faculty of medicine , Alexandria university
  • Principal Investigator: Sara S Saad-Eldien, PhD, Cairo university, faculty of physical therapy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 4, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 6, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • selective dorsal rhizotomy

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings