Symptoms and Outcome Measures for Upper- Limb Function in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 (SOUL-DM1)

April 23, 2025 updated by: Kristin Ørstavik, Oslo University Hospital
Myotonic Dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a multisystem disease that causes muscle weakness and myotonia. As a result upper limb function might become impaired. In this study we will examine patients with DM1 and record their upper limb function. We will will use a battery of patient reported outcomes (PROs) and Outcome measures (OMs) in order to evalute which ones are suitable for use in clinical practise and research studies.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
89

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Norway
      • Bergen, Norway
        • Haukeland University Hospital
      • Oslo, Norway
        • Oslo University Hispital
      • Siggerud, Norway
        • Frambu Centre for Rare Disorders

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults with Myotonic Dystrophy type 1 in Norway

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Genetically confirmed Myotonic Dystrophy type 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to answer or understand questionnaires due to language barriers or cognitive status
  • Unable to perform functional tests

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor Function Measures (MFM)
Time Frame: 30-45 minutes
Functional test
30-45 minutes
Nine Hole Peg Test
Time Frame: 1-3 minutes
Fine motor function test
1-3 minutes
Myogrip/Dynamometer
Time Frame: 1-3 minutes
Measures hand strenght
1-3 minutes
Myopinch
Time Frame: 1-3 minutes
Measures finger strenght
1-3 minutes
ABILHAND Questionnaire
Time Frame: 5 min
A measure of manual ability for adults with upper limb impairments. The scale measures a person's ability to manage daily activities that require the use of the upper limbs, whatever the strategies involved. Consists of 22 questions (18 to be answered by adults). The categories are easy, difficult or unable to perform. The querionnaire gives a sum score where higher score equals better function.Score from 0 to 36
5 min
ACTIVLIM Questionnaire
Time Frame: 5 min
A measure of activity limitations for patients with upper and/or lower limb impairments. The scale measures a patient's ability to perform daily activities requiring the use of the upper and/or the lower limbs, whatever the strategies involved. Consists of 22 questions (18 to be answered by adults). The categories are easy, difficult or unable to perform. The questionnaire gives a sum score where higher score equals better function. Score fror 0 to 36
5 min

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trunk Impairment Scale - modified Norwegian version
Time Frame: 8-15 minutes
Motor impairment of trunk measured by functional testing. Six subdomains measuring stability and mobility of trunkal movement. Min score 0 - Max score 16. Higher score indicates better function.
8-15 minutes
Four Square Step Test
Time Frame: 1-3 minutes
Dynamic balance test
1-3 minutes
Starkstein Apathy Scale
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Questionnaire to be filled in under guidance of interviewer. Patient reported outcome measure of apathy. 14 questions, each of which is scored on a 4-point scale of 0-3, and apathy is rated as severer as the total score (0-42) increases
5 minutes
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Cognitive assessment screening questionnaire. To be filled out in an interview setting. Score from 0 to 30, where a higher score indicates a better cognitive function. A score of 26 or more is considered normal.
10 minutes
Lung function test
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Spirometry with FVC (Forced Vital Capasity)
10 minutes
Lung function test
Time Frame: 10 minutes
PEF (Peak Expiratory Flow).
10 minutes
PROMIS29
Time Frame: 5-10 minutes
This a compostie measurement that is a Questionnaire. Patient reported outcome measure. Generic health related quality of life assesses each of the 7 PROMIS domains (depresseion, anxiety, physical function, pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance and ability to participate in social roles). The PROMIS 29 questionnaire contains 4 questions from each of seven PROMIS contents (physical function, depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disorder, participation in social activities and pain interaction) and 1 question from the intensity of pain. Each item has 5 answer options (from 1 to 5), only pain intensity has 11 answer options (from 0 to 10). From the sum of the answers to each question in the domain, the total raw score for each domain is calculated, resulting in seven domain scores, each between 4 and 20.
5-10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Oslo University Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Oslo
Haukeland University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kristin L Ørstavik, PHD, Oslo University Hospital
  • Study Director: Hilde S Robinson, PHD, University of Oslo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 23, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 255164

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings