Measuring Impact of Computer Gaming on Arm Use in Rett Syndrome
Assessing the Effectiveness of Customized Computer Activities on Reducing Stereotypies and Improving Independent Upper Extremity Motor Skills in Persons with Rett Syndrome
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Pamela S Diener, PhD, MS, OT/L
- Phone Number: 2403811763
- Email: psd23@georgetown.edu
Study Locations
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20057
- Recruiting
- Georgetown University School of Medicine
-
Contact:
- Pamela S Diener, PhD, MS, OT/L
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Rett syndrome,
- Understanding of cause and effect,
- Functional range of motion of arms to complete the movements needed to control the games.
Exclusion Criteria:
- no competing orthopedic or neuromuscular diagnosis that impacts shoulder movements
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Participants
The study involves a pre-intervention phase (4 weeks long), followed by a cause and effect training phase (1 week long), followed by an intervention phase (12 weeks long), and ending with a post-intervention phase (4-weeks long) for a total of 5-6 months from start to finish.
|
Investigators customize each gaming session based on the motivators and interests of each participant.
The intervention facilitates independent hand separations (minimizing stereotypies) and encourages independent arm/hand movement that serves to activate or control the computer-generated activities.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
functional Reach Test
Time Frame: To measure change, this test is administered (repeated) 5 times during the 5 month study: Day 1 (baseline); Day 32 (start of wk long training); Day 40 (after one wk training session); Day Day 130 (end of 12 wk intervention); Day 160 (post-intervention).
|
Investigators will video record all testing sessions so that the video can be viewed slow motion or frame by frame to count hand separations, number of reaches, time of sustained reaches, and sustained hand separations.
|
To measure change, this test is administered (repeated) 5 times during the 5 month study: Day 1 (baseline); Day 32 (start of wk long training); Day 40 (after one wk training session); Day Day 130 (end of 12 wk intervention); Day 160 (post-intervention).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Time Frame: To measure change, this test is administered on Day 1 (Baseline) and repeated at Day 120 (end of intervention phase)
|
In collaboration with the parents/carers, investigators will create three goals specific for each participant that relate to study aims and improving quality of daily living.
|
To measure change, this test is administered on Day 1 (Baseline) and repeated at Day 120 (end of intervention phase)
|
|
Functional Range of Motion (FROM)
Time Frame: To assess if a change in FROM occurs during the study, this test is administered on Day 1 (Baseline) and repeated at Day 120 (Post-intervention)
|
Assess range of shoulder and hand motion at start and at end of study to be sure that shoulder mobility is unchanged and/or not impacting the required motions for the intervention.
|
To assess if a change in FROM occurs during the study, this test is administered on Day 1 (Baseline) and repeated at Day 120 (Post-intervention)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- McAmis NE, Foreman MH, Himmelrich MD, Diener PS and Engsberg JR. Development of a Method to Use a Color Tracker for Motor Therapy for Individuals with Rett Syndrome. SM J Pediatr. 2017; 2(2): 1012.
- Mraz KM, Amadio G, Diener P, Eisenberg G, Engsberg JR. Improving upper extremity motor skills in girls with rett syndrome using virtual reality. J of Intellect Disabil - Diagnosis and Treatment, 2016, 4(3):142-151.
- Mraz, K, Eisenberg G, Diener P, Amadio G, Foreman MH, Engsberg JR. The Effects of Virtual Reality on the Upper Extremity Skills of Girls with Rett Syndrome: A Single Case Study. J of Intellect Disabil- Diagnosis and Treatment. 2016, 4(3):152-9.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2015-0656
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.