Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Versus Pulsed High Intensity Laser in the of Osteoprosis
Effect of Full-Body Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Versus Pulsed High Intensity Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Patients With Osteopenia or Osteoporosis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Mecca, Saudi Arabia, 715
- Al Noor Specialized Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a T-scores of ≤ #1.5, all patients received the same medical treatment for osteoporosis and the same average blood glucose level, sufficient ability to understand the nature and potential risks of the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, arrhythmia, uncontrolled thyroid disease, cardiac pacemaker, tuberculosis, neuropsychiatric disorders (dementia, cerebrovascular disease, alcohol abuse, severe depression, panic disorder, bipolar disorder, or psychosis), and malignancy.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Electromagnetic and Exercise Group
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) PEMF was administered to the whole body using a 1.8×0.6m
mat Exercise Program Exercise program to facilitate bone health
|
PEMF was administered to the whole body for PEMF groups using a 1.8×0.6m
mat 30 minutes/day, 3 times/week for 3 months.
The exercise training program included treadmill and aerobic exercises for hip and upper limb and performed for 50 minutes.
|
|
Active Comparator: Laser and Exercise Group
Pulsed High Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) HILT was administered to lumbar region and femoral head using Exercise Program Exercise program to facilitate bone health
|
The exercise training program included treadmill and aerobic exercises for hip and upper limb and performed for 50 minutes.
High Laser was delivered with a total dose of energy of 3000 J was delivered in two treatment phases.
The initial phase was performed with fast manual scanning at 510, 610, and 710 mJ/cm2 in three successive subphases and 500 J in each subphase for a total of 1500 J.
The final phase was the same as the initial phase except that the scanning was slow.
The average area for the upper thigh or lower back was 200 cm2 with an average fluency of 15 J/cm2 and the application time for each area was 18 min.
HILT was applied using a HIRO 3 device (ASA, Arcugnano, Vicenza, Italy).
|
|
Active Comparator: Exercise Group
Exercise Program Exercise program to facilitate bone health
|
The exercise training program included treadmill and aerobic exercises for hip and upper limb and performed for 50 minutes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline Bone Mineral Density at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
|
Bone Mineral Density was assessed by the DEXA in the lumbar spine, proximal femur and forearm region in g/cm2.
|
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
|
|
Change from baseline Vitamin D levels at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
|
Vitamin D test is the most accurate way to measure how much vitamin D is in the body.
Vitamin D in serum was measured as a standard procedure at the Department of Clinical Chemistry.
|
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
|
|
Change from baseline Alkaline Phosphatase at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
|
Alkaline Phosphatase was estimated colorimetric end point and kinetic using fully automated analyzer Advia Centaur, according to enclosed pamphlet.
|
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline Osteocalcin at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
|
Ostocalcin is a predictive marker for osteoprosis and bone fracture.
Serum Osteocalcin was measured in serum samples using an ELISA Kits.
|
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
|
|
Change from baseline Parathyroid Hormone at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
|
Parathyroid hormones (PTH) was measurement chemiluminescence immunoassays [QuiCkIntraOperativeTM intact PTH.
The assay was performed on the Immuno- automated analyzer (DPC) at the Department of Clinical Chemistry at Um ALQURA University, Faculty of Applied Medical Science.
The Roche intact-PTH test was assayed on an Elecsys-1010 immunoassay analyzer (Roche Diagnostics) with its "Stat-function.
|
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Umm AlQura U
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.