Effects of Different Designs of Orthokeratology Lens on Myopia Control and Visual Quality
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Shuxian Zhang, MD
- Phone Number: +8618630996574
- Email: xindewo2006@163.com
Study Locations
-
-
Tianjin
-
Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300020
- Recruiting
- Tianjin Eye Hospital
-
Contact:
- Shuxian Zhang
- Phone Number: +8618630996574
- Email: xindewo2006@163.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Myopia: between -1.00D and 4.00D in both eyes
- Astigmatism: <1.5D for with-the-rule astigmatism, <1.00D for the against-the-rule astigmatism
- Visual acuity: the best corrected vision acuity(BCVA)≥20/20 in both eyes
- Subjects that volunteer to participate in the clinical trial and sign informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindications of wearing Ortho-K.
- Diagnosis of strabismus, amblyopia and other refractive development of the eye or systemic diseases.
- Any type of strabismus or amblyopia
- Systemic condition which might affect refractive development (for example, Down syndrome, Marfan's syndrome)
- Ocular conditions which might affect the refractive error (for example, cataract, ptosis)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: FACTORIAL
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: Single-vision glasses
Subjects wearing single-vision glasses CR-39
|
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Orthokeratology lenses group 1
Subjects wearing orthokeratology lenses of 5mm optical zone.
|
The intervention was according to the design of different optical zone and peripheral reverse curve
Other Names:
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Orthokeratology lenses group 2
Subjects wearing orthokeratology lenses of 5.5mm optical zone.
|
The intervention was according to the design of different optical zone and peripheral reverse curve
Other Names:
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Orthokeratology lenses group 3
Subjects wearing orthokeratology lenses of 6mm optical zone.
|
The intervention was according to the design of different optical zone and peripheral reverse curve
Other Names:
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Orthokeratology lenses group 4
Subjects wearing orthokeratology lenses of 6mm optical zone and the increased height of peripheral reverse curve.
|
The intervention was according to the design of different optical zone and peripheral reverse curve
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in axial length in 2 years
Time Frame: Every 6 months for a period 2 years
|
The axial length was measured by AL-scan
|
Every 6 months for a period 2 years
|
|
Changes in Cycloplegic subjective refraction in 2 years
Time Frame: Every 6 months for a period 2 years
|
The cycloplegic subjective refraction was evaluated by optometrist
|
Every 6 months for a period 2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in visual questionnaire as compared to baseline(Postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months)
Time Frame: baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
The symptoms score measured by a visual questionnaire, each symptom was evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10.
|
baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
|
Change in High-order aberrations (HOAs) in microns as compared to baseline(Postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months)
Time Frame: baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
Ocular aberration measured by Zeiss i. Profiler Plus aberrometer
|
baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
|
Change in contrast sensitivity as compared to baseline(Postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months)
Time Frame: baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
Contrast sensitivity measured by Stereo optical 6500
|
baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
|
Change in choroidal thickness captured by Optical Coherent Tomographer (OCT) as compared to baseline(Postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months)
Time Frame: baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
choroidal thickness captured by Optical Coherent Tomographer (OCT) and measured using a customized software
|
baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
|
Change in Corneal epithelial thickness captured by Optical Coherent Tomographer (OCT) as compared to baseline(Postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months)
Time Frame: baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
Corneal epithelial thickness captured by Optical Coherent Tomographer (OCT) customized software
|
baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
|
Change in corneal biomechanics parameters (SSI) as compared to baseline (Postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months)
Time Frame: baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
Corneal response parameters(SSI) was evaluated by Corvis ST.
|
baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
|
Change in peripheral refraction as compared to baseline (Postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months)
Time Frame: baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
Peripheral refraction measured by multispectral refraction topography
|
baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
|
Change in corneal surface regularity index (SRI) as compared to baseline (Postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months)
Time Frame: baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
The corneal surface regularity index (SRI) was measured by Corneal Topography.
|
baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
|
Change in corneal surface asymmetry index (SAI) as compared to baseline (Postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months)
Time Frame: baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
The corneal surface asymmetry index (SAI) was measured by Corneal Topography.
|
baseline, postoperative 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- He M, Du Y, Liu Q, Ren C, Liu J, Wang Q, Li L, Yu J. Effects of orthokeratology on the progression of low to moderate myopia in Chinese children. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul 27;16:126. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0302-5.
- Huang J, Wen D, Wang Q, McAlinden C, Flitcroft I, Chen H, Saw SM, Chen H, Bao F, Zhao Y, Hu L, Li X, Gao R, Lu W, Du Y, Jinag Z, Yu A, Lian H, Jiang Q, Yu Y, Qu J. Efficacy Comparison of 16 Interventions for Myopia Control in Children: A Network Meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2016 Apr;123(4):697-708. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.11.010. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
- Hu Y, Wen C, Li Z, Zhao W, Ding X, Yang X. Areal summed corneal power shift is an important determinant for axial length elongation in myopic children treated with overnight orthokeratology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;103(11):1571-1575. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312933. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
- Paune J, Fonts S, Rodriguez L, Queiros A. The Role of Back Optic Zone Diameter in Myopia Control with Orthokeratology Lenses. J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 18;10(2):336. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020336.
- Gifford P, Tran M, Priestley C, Maseedupally V, Kang P. Reducing treatment zone diameter in orthokeratology and its effect on peripheral ocular refraction. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020 Feb;43(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 24.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- TianjinEH-Orthokeratology lens
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.