Continuous Glucose Monitoring for High-Risk Type 2 Diabetes in the Hospital (Cyber GEMS) (Cyber GEMS)

March 5, 2026 updated by: Athena Philis-Tsimikas, Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute

Continuous Glucose Monitoring for High-Risk Type 2 Diabetes in the Hospital: Cloud-Based Real-Time Glucose Evaluation and Management System (Cyber GEMS)

Given the known serious consequences of uncontrolled blood sugars during hospitalization, this research plans to study an alternative seamlessly integrated continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system in the hospital to test a dynamic and digitized, team-based approach to glucose management in an underserved and understudied, yet high-risk population. A digital dashboard will facilitate real-time, remote monitoring of a large volume of patients simultaneously; automatically identify and prioritize patients for intervention; and will detect any and all potentially dangerous hypoglycemic episodes in a hospital environment. The study will focus on clinical metrics of glucose control and infection that are in-line with patient priorities and US hospital quality initiatives.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

There is strong evidence that poor glycemic control in the hospital is common. Given the known consequences of uncontrolled blood sugars during a hospitalization (e.g., infection, serious neurological and cardiac complications, mortality, longer lengths of stay, readmissions, higher healthcare costs), health systems devote significant resources to developing protocols for improving glucometrics. Despite the widespread use and demonstrated effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for ambulatory glucose management, CGMs is not routinely used in US hospitals. Therefore, the long-term goal to develop Cloud-Based Real-Time Glucose Evaluation and Management System (Cyber GEMS) is to provide an effective, real-time solution to augment existing processes, to provide a valuable test of real-world effectiveness, while capitalizing on standardized algorithms to facilitate sustainability and scalability to other systems and at-risk populations. The intervention will enable hospital care teams to take immediate steps based on the wireless transmission of glucose data from the Dexcom G6 device, sent to a digital dashboard, where integration with existing real-world hospital processes can provide immediate prioritization to prevent or correct impending hypoglycemia and severe hyperglycemic events. This study is a randomized controlled trial, defined as a Phase II/III definitive clinical trial that in turn establishes efficacy and effectiveness of this intervention. Aim 1 will establish the effectiveness of Cyber GEMS versus Usual Care (UC) in increasing the % time patients are in-range and decreasing % time in hypoglycemia and severe hyperglycemia during hospitalization. Aim 2 will evaluate the effectiveness of Cyber GEMS versus UC in decreasing hospital-acquired infection risk. A digital dashboard will facilitate real-time, wireless transmission of glucose data of a large volume of patients simultaneously; automatically identify and prioritize patients for intervention; and detect potentially dangerous hypoglycemic episodes - all at a reduced burden than current methods of stratification and review. The uninterrupted coverage, and efficient and remote diabetes specialist oversight in Cyber GEMS is a scalable, novel, team-based approach to maximize the use of continuously streaming CGM data for optimal glucose management.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
518

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Chula Vista, California, United States, 91910
        • Scripps Mercy Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented previous or current Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) diagnosis as defined by either diagnosis in the chart or an HbA1c > or = to 6.5% in the last 90 days
  • Either on subcutaneous (SQ) insulin orders, or greater than two serum or Point of Care (POC) glucose > or = 200 mg/dL in most recent 24 hours of admission

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anticipated length of stay < 24 hours;
  • Current or anticipated ICU placement;
  • Does not speak English or Spanish;
  • Known allergy to adhesives;
  • Current participation in any medication or device research study;
  • Pregnant;
  • Any other condition that Multiple Principal Investigator (MPI) Philis-Tsimikas or the attending physician deems contraindicated

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Continuous Glucose Monitoring
Research Assistants (RAs) will verbally administer baseline survey and insert Dexcom G6 CGM, before unveiling the group assignment. CGM data will be transmitted from bedside iPhone to web-based platforms for: (1) Real-Time Management (via iPad-based FOLLOW app used by bedside RN and Digital Dashboard used by remote monitoring team) and (2) Clinical Optimization (via CLARITY, a Diabetes RN Coordinator will conduct remote clinical management of patients from a central, Scripps Diabetes Hub). A post-CGM satisfaction survey will be administered and compensation provided when CGM is removed prior to discharge or within 2 weeks following discharge. The CGM readings will be used to make recommendations for insulin adjustment and glucose management. After discharge, CGM data will be downloaded from a HIPPA-compliant, web-based CGM data management tool, and saved in Excel. The Data Analyst, blinded to condition, will routinely screen CGM data and merge individual spreadsheets for analysis.
Device: Dexcom G6 Continous Glucose Monitoring Management
CGM data will be transmitted from the bedside iPhone to web-based platforms for: (1) Real-Time Management (via iPad-based FOLLOW app used by bedside RN and Digital Dashboard used by the remote monitoring team) and (2) Clinical Optimization (via CLARITY, by which a Diabetes RN Coordinator will conduct remote clinical management of patients from a central, Scripps Diabetes Hub.
Active Comparator: Usual Care
RAs will verbally administer a baseline survey and insert the Dexcom G6 CGM. before unveiling the group assignment. CGM data will be blinded and used for evaluation purposes only. Glucose will be monitored via the hospital's standard POC testing protocol (i.e., prior to meals and at bedtime for patients who are eating, and every 4-6 waking hours if not eating). Glucose management in UC is designed to minimize differences between groups, aside from CGM monitoring, A post-CGM satisfaction survey will be administered and compensation provided when the CGM is removed prior to discharge or within 2 weeks following discharge. After discharge, CGM data will be downloaded from a HIPPA-compliant, web-based CGM data management tool, and saved in individual Excel spreadsheets. The study Data Analyst, blinded to study condition, will routinely screen CGM data and merge individual spreadsheets for analysis.
Device: Usual Care - Blinded Continuous Glucose Monitoring Management
CGM data will be blinded and used for evaluation purposes only. Glucose will be monitored via the hospital's standard POC testing protocol (i.e., prior to meals and at bedtime for patients who are eating, and every 4-6 waking hours if not eating). Glucose management in UC is designed to minimize differences between groups, aside from CGM monitoring.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent time in range
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
Participants will have their percent time in range calculated following a minimum CGM data collection period of 12 hours and expressed as a percentage where: Percent Time in Range= 100 (Number readings in range (70-200mg/dL)/Total number of readings from CGM). Number of readings will be used in calculation, which scale directly with time.
Immediately following intervention completion
Percent time spent in hypoglycemia and percent time in severe hyperglycemia
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
Our second outcome will be assessed by the same methods as the first, but instead looking at Percent Time in Severe Hyperglycemic Range (>300mg/dL) and Percent Time in Hypoglycemic Range (<70mg/dL).
Immediately following intervention completion
Infection Rate
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
Rates of hospital-acquired infection are defined as skin wound or surgical site, central line-associated bloodstream infection, urinary tract infection, bacteremia, clostridium difficile infection, or pneumonia not present at admission. Unadjusted incidence rates among study participants will be compared between intervention and control groups via Chi-Square test of two proportions.
Immediately following intervention completion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glucose Variability
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
Using CGM data, glucose variability will be determined by first calculating the coefficient of variation for each participant, dividing the standard deviation of the glucose readings of that participant, by the mean of those readings and multiplying by 100 to get a percentage. Mean coefficients of variation will be compared between intervention and control groups by a students t test.
Immediately following intervention completion
Electronic Medical Record (EMR) - Derived Outcomes: HbA1C
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
Additional metrics of glycemic control will be captured for each study participant from the EMR including: HbA1C. Like primary outcome analyses, group mean differences of each variable will be assessed unadjusted with a students t-test utilized to detect between-group differences.
Immediately following intervention completion
Electronic Medical Record (EMR) - Derived Outcome: fasting POC blood glucose
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
Additional metrics of glycemic control will be captured for each study participant from the EMR including fasting point-of-care (POC) blood glucose measurements (mg/dL). Like primary outcome analyses, group mean differences of each variable will be assessed unadjusted with a students t-test utilized to detect between-group differences.
Immediately following intervention completion

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Process Indicators (Reach): Enrollment Characteristics
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
To examine enrollment rate, demographic characteristics of eligible patients will be compared between those who enroll versus decline; where continuous measures will be compared between groups will be compared between groups by Chi-Square tests.
Immediately following intervention completion
Process Indicators (Reach): Representative Characteristics
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
To examine generalizability of our sample, distribution of demographics in our sample will be compared to expected distributions of our target population through Chi-square tests.
Immediately following intervention completion
Process Indicators (Reach): CGM wear time
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
Median time on CGM will also be compared between Cyber GEMs and UC groups using a Mann-Whitney test.
Immediately following intervention completion
Process Indicators (Reach): Withdrawal rate
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
We do not plan to statistically assess reasons for withdrawal due to an anticipated low number of withdrawals, but all reasons will be recorded and descriptively quantified where applicable.
Immediately following intervention completion
Process Indicators (Efficacy): Impact of time on CGM
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
A generalized linear model will be used to assess whether time on CGM relates to changes in the percent time in primary and secondary outcome ranges over time.
Immediately following intervention completion
Process Indicators (Efficacy): Negative outcomes
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
Unintended negative outcomes will be recorded and descriptively analyzed.
Immediately following intervention completion
Process Indicators (Adoption): Perceptions of CGM
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
Results of semi-structured interviews will be qualitatively, descriptively analyzed to reveal perceptions of CGM implementation efficacy, challenges, satisfaction, and benefits.
Immediately following intervention completion
Process Indicators (Adoption): Clinical perceptions of glucose management
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
Descriptively assess physicians pre- and post study perceptions and knowledge of and identified barriers to successful inpatient glucose control via the Inpatient Glucose Management Questionnaire (IGCQ).
Immediately following intervention completion
Process Indicators (Implementation): Alarm actions
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
# of alarms for glucose managed by the Clinical Transfer Center (Cyber GEMS only) will be quantified for percent adherence to protocol by: # of times Clinical Transfer Center notified bedside Registered Nurse (RN) / # of qualifying alarms. Rates of follow-up POC testing at bedside will be analyzed/statistically tested by fitting a linear model with # of alarms.
Immediately following intervention completion
Process Indicators (Implementation): CGM satisfaction
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
CGM satisfaction will be determined using a modified CGM Satisfaction Scale. Questions regarding comfort/interruption, given in both arms and mean overall scores compared by unpaired students t-tests.
Immediately following intervention completion
Process Indicators (Maintenance): Enrollment progress
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
Number of participants will be continuously monitored by the Data Analyst throughout the study period and tracked against projected numbers for enrollment.
Immediately following intervention completion
Process Indicators (Maintenance): Stakeholder and advisory board feedback
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention completion
Feedback from Stakeholders and Community Advisory Board members will be descriptively analyzed.
Immediately following intervention completion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Addie Fortmann, PhD, Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Athena Philis-Tsimikas, MD, Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 19, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 17, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 17, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 5, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R01DK124427 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings