The Impact of Pain on Depression Outcomes

April 11, 2023 updated by: Alexandra Carne, Teesside University

The Impact of Pain on Depression Outcomes of Older Adults in Behavioural Activation: An Exploratory Secondary Data Analysis

This study is a secondary data analysis of three of largest Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) of behavioural activation (BA) for older people with depression in the United Kingdom (UK) primary care. The analysis will aim to explore the impact of pain on depression outcomes of older people receiving BA and potentially identify sub-groups of people who may not respond as well to treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Previous findings have indicated that pain might be an important barrier in depression treatment both with antidepressant medication and in a United States (US) collaborative care model using problem solving therapy and antidepressant medication. It is unknown, however, if pain impacts depression outcomes of older adults in a collaborative care (CC) framework focusing on a brief psychological intervention of BA. Collectively CASPER, CASPER PLUS (+) and SHARD are three of the largest pragmatic, multi-centre randomised controlled trials (RCT) of BA for older adults in UK primary care with low mood and depression. The purpose of this secondary data analysis is, therefore, to explore if pain moderates (modifies) the effect of BA on depression outcomes in older adults, potentially identifying subgroups of older adults who may not respond as well to BA.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1522

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • Middlesbrough, United Kingdom, TS1 3BX
        • Teesside University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients were aged 65 years or older with subthreshold depression (CASPER and SHARD) or case-level depression (CASPER+)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who participated in CASPER, CASPER + or SHARD study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anyone who did not consent into one of the three studies above

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Other

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
CASPER
A multi-centred, pragmatic, two-arm parallel open RCT. Participants with Subthreshold depression were individually randomised (1:1) to receive either collaborative care focusing on behavioural activation or usual GP care
Behavioral: Collaborative care
Participants in the intervention group were allocated a receive a low-intensity programme of behavioural activation specifically designed for adults ≥65 with subthreshold depression. An allocated case manager (primary care mental health worker/ Improving Access to Psychological Therapy) delivered collaborative care for an intended 8-10 weeks. This ran alongside general practitioner (GP) usual care. Collaborative care in both CASPER and CASPER+ trial included weakly telephone/ face-to-face support, active surveillance and symptom monitoring
Other Names:
  • behavioural activation
Other: Usual General Practitioner (GP) care
Participants allocated to the control group received usual GP care. Participants did not receive any additional care to their usual primary care management for subthreshold (CASPER) or Major (CASPER+) depression in line with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines as implemented in their GP and local service provision.
CASPER+
A multi-centred, pragmatic, two-arm parallel open RCT. Participants with Major depression were individually randomised (1:1) to receive either collaborative care focusing on behavioural activation or usual GP care
Behavioral: Collaborative care
Participants in the intervention group were allocated a receive a low-intensity programme of behavioural activation specifically designed for adults ≥65 with subthreshold depression. An allocated case manager (primary care mental health worker/ Improving Access to Psychological Therapy) delivered collaborative care for an intended 8-10 weeks. This ran alongside general practitioner (GP) usual care. Collaborative care in both CASPER and CASPER+ trial included weakly telephone/ face-to-face support, active surveillance and symptom monitoring
Other Names:
  • behavioural activation
Other: Usual General Practitioner (GP) care
Participants allocated to the control group received usual GP care. Participants did not receive any additional care to their usual primary care management for subthreshold (CASPER) or Major (CASPER+) depression in line with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines as implemented in their GP and local service provision.
SHARD
A multi-centred, pragmatic, two-arm parallel open RCT. Participants with Subthreshold depression were individually randomised (1:1) to receive the self-help booklet based on the principles of behavioural activation or usual GP care
Other: Usual General Practitioner (GP) care
Participants allocated to the control group received usual GP care. Participants did not receive any additional care to their usual primary care management for subthreshold (CASPER) or Major (CASPER+) depression in line with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines as implemented in their GP and local service provision.
Behavioral: Behavioral Activation Self-Help guide
Participants in the intervention arm were provided with a self-help booklet based on clear principles of BA for depression. The purpose of the booklet was to introduce simple behavioural strategies for improving mood. Participants were encouraged to (1) re-establish their daily routine, (2) increase meaningful activities and (3) reduce avoidance behaviours. Participants also received 3 phone calls at week 1, 3 and 6 designed to check the booklet had arrived and to encourage the use of the materials. All participants received their usual GP care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PhQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire- 9
Time Frame: Baseline
5 point likert scale ranging from 0 to 27. Higher points denote worse depression. The instrument is used for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression in primary care.
Baseline
PhQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire- 9
Time Frame: 4 months
5 point likert scale ranging from 0 to 27. Higher points denote worse depression. The instrument is used for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression in primary care.
4 months
SF-12 (Short Form- 12)
Time Frame: Baseline
The instrument is a generic health status measure consisting of 12 questions measuring 8 domains. Question 8 referring to bodily pain will be used for the moderation analysis. The tool has a likhert scale of 1-5 with 5 denotating worse pain.
Baseline
EQ-5D (Euroqual Group)
Time Frame: Baseline
The EQ-5D consists of 5 questions assessing the various quality of life dimensions including mobility, self-care, usual activities, Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension is rated on three levels: no problem (score=1) some problems (score=2) and extreme problems (score=3). Question 4 relating to pain/discomfort will be used as a second indicator for the pain moderator.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Teesside University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of York

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Alexandra S Carne, PhD Student, Teesside University/ Univeristy of York

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 11, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 8838
  • ISRCTN02202951 (Registry Identifier: ISRCTN registry)
  • ISRCTN45842879 (Registry Identifier: ISRCTN registry)
  • ISRCTN95270332 (Registry Identifier: ISRCTN registry)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings